The IC schema and supporting documentation have been approved for use on the Exchange Network. The most current version is v1.0.

Probably, it is hard to win anything with deep space's telescope, because data received from it, will not be so preciseness.

The main advantage of such a telescope would be the ability to look through space without an atmosphere in the way - and the Hubble telescope already has almost all of that advantage.

Institutional controls (IC) are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and protect the integrity of a remedial action. ICs can reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. ICs are primarily used when residual contamination remains onsite at levels that does not allow for unrestricted exposure after cleanup. ICs are also used to supplement engineering controls (EC), which encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers to contain or prevent exposure to contamination on a site. In some cases, ICs are used to address existing contamination while remedial action remains ongoing. ICs are rarely, however, the sole remedy at a site.

By the time you got a telescope far enough to produce a real change in what we can observe, it would be next to impossible to communicate with it, and latencies would be upwards of months.

On July 8, 2013, the Network Technology Board sponsored an Open Conference Call to review the Institutional Controls Data Exchange.

The IC schema and supporting documentation have been approved for use on the Exchange Network. The most current version is v1.0.

Baselines for parallax measurements for pairs of telescopes, assuming the images are taken at the same moment as opposed to '6 months apart' as is done to get the maximum parallax possible from a single point on Earth.

For infra-red astronomy, operating anywhere near the sun can be problematic. Even the James Webb Space Telescope design has issues in that the sun shield is expected to degrade over time causing a gradual increase in the telescope's operating temperature and corresponding decrease in the telescope's effectiveness.

The SETI@home project uses a sneakernet to overcome bandwidth limitations: data recorded by the radio telescope in Arecibo, Puerto Rico is stored on magnetic tapes which are then shipped to Berkeley, California for processing. In 2005, Jim Gray reported sending hard drives and even "metal boxes with processors" to transport large amounts of data by postal mail.

IC ControlMedia & Sport AB

It does also raise the possibility to pass directly behind the planet and view the upper reaches of the atmosphere as they filter the light from the Sun. I believe this can aid in determining the composition of the atmosphere.

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Look at the picture. This is SETI@home's radio telescope. It is situated in Puerto Rico. There is no technology on the Earth, to move all amount of data by radio or wires to Berkeley, California, but physically, with whole of storage, magnetic tapes in that case.

An IR telescope launched into deep space would be free of any meaningful source of heat and would be able to operate at optimal temperatures pretty much indefinitely. Indefinitely, in this case, being defined by the lifespan of the telescopes critical hardware components.

The L2/L3 Lagrange points would be most optimal. Since these are on the opposite side of the sun by definition, the baseline will change much less over time. The baselines are (very) approximately as much larger than those of Earth's L2/L3 distance, directly in proportion to the orbital radii of the other planet.

Maximum baseline advantage between Earth orbit and the orbits of other planets, when in opposition. Approximate, given the distances are the average of the elliptical orbits.

Farming Simulator 23 mods

Parallax measurements. Sending a pair of telescopes into deep space, or a single scope with an Earth(/Earth orbit) based counterpart, would allow us to view the 3-D nature of the galaxy to a greater distance/depth.

An astronomical interferometer is an array of telescopes or mirror segments acting together to probe structures with higher resolution by means of interferometry. The benefit of the interferometer is that the angular resolution of the instrument is nearly that of a telescope with the same aperture as a single large instrument encompassing all of the individual photon-collecting sub-components. The drawback is that it does not collect as many photons as a large instrument of that size. Thus it is mainly useful for fine resolution of the more luminous astronomical objects, such as close binary stars.

Once a single telescope has gone far enough, it does enable us to see different perspectives on local objects. E.G. This picture of Saturn taken by NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft in 1980.

When I first heard of the Voyager missions I thought this: why not do the same, only make it a telescope? I thought it would surely see a lot of things we can't see from Earth or the inner Solar System. I just thought that when you're in a place that's sufficiently different, you start to see different things or the same things differently.

ICcontrols FS22

Yes, there is at least one advantage to a deep-space telescope. That would be getting away from our Sun's dust cloud to avoid the reflected Zodiacal light. In fact, such missions have been proposed in order to study the Extra-Galactic Background Light which is blocked by Zodiacal light. They would ideally like to get out to 5 AU and well above or below the ecliptic.

Having said that, I suspect the atmospheres of most objects in the Solar System is pretty well quantified, and getting such images would add little to our existing knowledge.

Such telescopes do not have to be very large, nor transmit very much data in order to improve on our current ability to see the EBL by a few orders of magnitude. That sort of increase gets astronomers very excited.

I wrote "(very) approximate" above because the L2 point is very much affected by the mass of the planet (bigger mass leads to further away from the planet) and distance from the Sun (larger orbital radius leads to larger planet/L2 distance).

An IC data standard was first released in 2006 as a product of the Environmental Data Standards Council. The standard was applied toward the development of Missouri’s state environmental management system, and also developed partially into an IC XML schema by California Department of Toxic Substances Control. More states now inventory ICs in databases, many of which provide public-facing displays. Enforcement interest in ICs has grown from merely inventorying ICs toward evaluation of their effectiveness. This is evidenced by States that periodically monitor ICs or that assign affirmative obligations to landowners or responsible parties to report on IC obligations and effectiveness.

In 2013, an Integrated Project Team led by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, the EN Coordinator, and the Environmental Council of the States developed the implementation resources necessary to allow Partners to publish IC data via the Exchange Network using a standardized data format. The IC data may also embed EC data. The IC Data Exchange provides both Query and Solicit services. No data processing services are required. The data publishing services will support both REST and SOAP service requests.

However, as you mention! you would have to send these things a long ways just to produce the most minute change in our perspective. Since we are talking about hundreds of thousands of light years, the distance to the outside of the solar system wouldn't be close to enough.