However, as of 2012, according to the human-rights organization Amnesty International USA, there had been at least 500 deaths as a result of Taser use by law enforcement in the United States, which belies the “nonlethal” claim concerning Taser use. Many of the deaths have been attributed to related medical conditions, such as heart disease, to illicit drug use at the time a Taser was used, and to the Tasers themselves.

A number of alternatives were tried. In the 1990s, the Taser became a nonlethal alternative to the use of deadly force where the baton was insufficient to control persons. However, the Taser presented its own set of problems, which resulted in lawsuits and limiting legislation.

Can a taser kill you

Professionals from retailers, solution providers, manufacturers, law enforcement, and industry partners work together in topic-focused working groups for a united front against retail crime.

What is unique about the Taser is its ability to inflict a high degree of pain and suffering on a suspect while leaving few marks, such as those that would be left by a baton or a firearm. When Taser use results in death, there is physical evidence of its misuse, but in nonlethal cases, it is more difficult to prove misuse. As demonstrated in the case of Rodney King, without evidence such as a videotape or physical evidence, it is difficult to establish charges of police abuse through the use of Tasers.

LPRC members get direct access to the latest evidence-based research field and lab studies, as well as leading-edge solutions created in tandem with solution providers. Retailers use this information to develop more effective loss-prevention strategies, while solution providers can use their access to develop the next generation of solutions.

TASER 10

The Taser was first developed in the mid-1970s by American inventor Jack Cover. Taser is an acronym for Tom A. Swift Electric Rifle (the Tom Swift books about an inventor of amazing gadgets were a childhood favorite of Cover) and is a brand name for the device, which is manufactured by Taser International. During the 1990s, the Taser was introduced to law enforcement use as an alternative to deadly force. As of 2011, more than 15,000 law enforcement agencies in the United States used the Taser.

TASER X26P

As a member, you’ll learn from the industry’s leading loss prevention experts who provide information through LPRC’s working groups. This equips company asset protection professionals to educate their staff and implement tools and techniques that work.

TASER self defense

LPRC events provide opportunities for collaboration, discussion, and education on the latest trends in crime, innovative solutions, and research plans. From working groups to the annual LPRC IMPACT conference, there are many opportunities to get involved and connected.

From specialized summits and ongoing working groups to our flagship LPRC IMPACT conference, LPRC hosts numerous opportunities for members to be actively involved in shaping the future of our industry.

During this year’s summit in Gainesville, we’ll collaborate with retailers and law enforcement experts to learn how to predict, deter, and manage active shooter events. We’ll watch a live simulation and put together “go bags.”

LPRC’s work in supply chain protection provides valuable opportunities for retailers, solution providers, and other stakeholders to learn about the latest trends, best practices, and technologies in this critical lifeline for retailers.

Protecting people and property is the foundation for everything we do at the LPRC. We understand the growing and ever-evolving concerns over violent crime and organized retail crime, which is why our team actively works to combat it through a variety of initiatives, events, and practical resources.

TASER 10 for sale

INNOVATE is our lab location where scientific studies are conducted, solutions are tested, and virtual lab tests take place. Members have access to these labs and studies.

Learn the latest best practices for safeguarding your products and hear retail LP/AP experts share their latest research findings, strategies, and innovations about retail product protection.

The general principle of escalation of force by law enforcement consisted of the following continuum: verbal control, hand control, handcuffs, mace, batons, and finally firearms. The huge gap between the use of the baton and the use of a firearm presented problems for law enforcement. As a result, law enforcement personnel shot people who arguably should not have been shot and could have been saved if there were a less-lethal alternative.

The resulting furor about the problems with Tasers has resulted in numerous lawsuits and calls for controlling legislation. In partial response to these complaints, special cameras can now be attached to Tasers whenever they are used. Although in itself the Taser is a race-neutral tool, police use of the Taser has been disproportionately directed toward minorities. Numerous newspapers and official reports address this issue. For example, from 2006 to 2007, in Sioux City, Iowa, of 70 uses of the Taser, 33 were against racial minorities. Between 2012 and 2014, police in Baltimore, Maryland, used Tasers 730 times; nearly 90 percent of the time, the suspect was African American, even though African Americans made up just 63 percent of the city’s population. In 2015, Connecticut police used Tasers 56 percent of the time against minorities, even though they constituted just 19 percent of the population, and were more likely to threaten Taser use but not actually fire against white suspects than against African American or Hispanics.

LPRC events are where retailers and other industry professionals gather to connect and find the latest research, technologies, and best practices for fighting against retail crime.

X26 TASER

There has been extensive criticism of the method and circumstances in which the Taser has been used. For example, law enforcement personnel have used the Taser on a 6-year-old boy who held a broken piece of glass, on a 12-year-old girl who was running from a law enforcement officer, on an elderly person who failed to stand up when ordered to do so, and on a person already handcuffed who subsequently died. Also, there have been numerous criticisms of the use of the Taser on people with mental illnesses. Furthermore, there have been numerous complaints of the Taser being used to torture subjects, by both multiple and extended applications of the electric shocks.

Taser for women

Each year, the LPRC board of advisors meets for two days in February to finalize and approve the focus of our research for the upcoming year. LPRC IGNITE takes place at the LPRC labs on the campus of the University of Florida in Gainesville.

Membership opens doors to a safe place where competitive retailers can come together to solve common issues and protect the overall marketplace from criminal threats. LPRC’s unique approach to dynamic collaboration helps retailers protect their assets, staff, customers, and the overall marketplace.

Taser, handheld device that incapacitates a person by transmitting a 50,000-volt electric shock. The Taser fires two small darts, connected to the device with thin wires, up to a distance of approximately 11 metres (35 feet). The darts can penetrate clothing and, once they make contact with the target, deliver the electric shock, which disrupts the target’s nervous system, resulting in temporary incapacitation. The Taser is not considered a firearm, because it uses compressed nitrogen to launch the darts. A Taser can also be used as a stun gun by pressing it directly against the target’s body, thereby administering the electric shock.

TASER 7

LPRC actively conducts lab and field research to test, verify, and apply real science to retail programs and technologies.

The Loss Prevention Research Council is committed to improving retail asset protection with evidence-based research and industry collaboration. The five pillars of the LPRC ecosystem are research, innovate, collaborate, inform, and engage. We’re on a mission to prevent and detect theft, fraud, and violence using research to find evidence-based solutions.

The LPRC KICKOFF is your chance to engage with other retail loss prevention leaders to shape the upcoming research focus for the new year. During this half-day conference held every January, participants get a preview of our upcoming research agenda and speak into what they hope the studies and experiments will reveal.

LPRC maintains a library of resources to provide our members with the latest ideas, evidence, and information about asset protection, as well as media coverage including trends and developments.

As retail crime evolves and becomes increasingly aggressive, retailers need more innovative solutions to protect their assets, minimize losses, and create a safer environment for employees and shoppers everywhere.

Since the practical recognition of civil rights by the U.S. Supreme Court concerning police abuse in the 1960s, the improper use of deadly force has become a significant problem for law enforcement agencies. The Supreme Court’s decision in Tennessee v. Garner (1985) highlighted that there were significant limits to the use of deadly force under the Bill of Rights.

Many law enforcement agencies reported outstanding success concerning the Taser. These agencies cited numerous examples where it prevented the use of deadly force in many situations, thereby saving lives. There is little doubt that the availability of a nonlethal tool to control people who need to be subdued is much preferable to the use of a firearm.