EschenbachMagnifiers

Global contrast is the measure of a system's ability to transfer enough information to maintain relative difference. If a thick black line neighbors a thick white line, a lens with high contrast (regardless of it's resolving power) should transfer white as white and black as black. The transition between the black and white line may blur, thus producing a soft transition between the two rather than a hard transition...but a lens capable of high contrast will transfer white as white and black as black. A lens that is not capable of high contrast may transfer white as a bright gray, and black as a dark gray. A particularly poor lens may transfer both white and black as a middle toned gray. The part of the test chart responsible for testing the contrast of an optical system must be larger than the smallest element of detail the system can resolve in order to be useful for this purpose.

ZeissMagnifiers

It really helps to fully understand what MTF really is. Modulation Transfer Function. That second word is key here...transfer. The MTF measures how well information "transfers" from one medium to another. In the case of a lens, the original medium is reality, an original analog signal of, for all intents and purposes, "infinite" resolution. (Obviously there might be a finite resolution if you photograph atoms or molecules...but we'll ignore those cases for the moment.) That original signal is transferred to, and through, the lens. The result on the other side of the lens is a modulated function of that transfer. Similarly, in the case of a sensor, information projected by the lens is again transferred.

Aren't they both a measure of contrast? That's what the Y axis is measuring. How I understood the graph is: At a specific resolution (10, 30, etc), how much contrast will it retain at a specific distance away from the center. Both lines are actually a measure of contrast, is it not?

Best reading Magnifier

First off, the use of 10lp/mm and 30lp/mm are not really a standard. Depending on the market for the lenses, the brand, and possibly the rough timeframe when a specific approach to producing MTF charts was formulated, the specific resolution of the features of a test chart can vary. Larger format cameras often used 40-50lp/mm test charts, and manufacturers of modern lenses still use 40lp/mm (Zeiss/Leica come to mind.) Ultimately, the resolution (spatial resolution, in this context) of the test chart is somewhat arbitrary. That said, current test charts, be it 10 & 30 lp/mm or 20 and 50 lp/mm, may not even be sufficient for modern lenses and digital sensors, which are theoretically capable of resolving finer details with higher microcontrast than even the best lenses of decades past. When part of a total optical system, however, most systems (lens + sensor, for this discussion) rarely resolve more than 50-70 lp/mm due to how "real images" with high analog precision transfer to the discrete pixel grid of a sensor.

Magnification 3.0 x. Lens 100 x 75 mm. Double Lens. Made Germany. The Visolux+ is a new, illuminated stand magnifier from Eschenbach Many feature...

MTF of a sensor is usually some derivative of its physical spatial resolution...the spacing of each pixel, factoring in loss due to a bayer design, spatial incongruence between green and red/blue pixels, optical low pass filter strength, etc. A good rule of thumb is that the spatial resolution of a CMOS image sensor (CIS) is ~73% of its base spatial resolution as derived by it's pixel pitch, although one might adjust that if they have no OLPF, or think they have a strong one, or have a sensor that does not use gapless microlenses, etc.

If we take Canon and Nikon, both of whom I believe use a 10 & 30 lp/mm "test" for their lenses, I believe the choice to use those particular detail frequencies is a hangover from original decisions decades ago. The continued use of those frequencies is to likely maintain consistency between MTF charts generated for modern lenses, allowing them to be directly compared against MTF charts for lenses 20, 30, maybe even 50 years old. So, why 10lp/mm and 30lp/mm? The general idea is to have one set of detail elements in the test scene which are, in relative terms, much larger than the resolving power of the imaging system, and one set of detail elements in the test scene which are, in relative terms, very similar to the resolving power of the imaging system.

Lightedmagnifiers

The most sold magnifier in our store. The pocket magnifier is a compact, 5x power, LED Lighted, slide-out Aspheric magnifying glass with a protecti...

Enhance your magnification experience with the Magnifier Mobilux LED 3.5x from ESCHENBACH. Dive into the world of the new Mobilux series of LED han...

If we use one of Canon's MTF charts as an example. A standard Canon MTF chart is plotted with quality being the Y axis, and point along the lens from center to corner being the X axis. Canon's standard indicates that 0.6 is the baseline...any line on the plot that drops below 0.6 is poor quality. Between 0.6 is good quality. Above 0.8 is excellent quality. Solid lines represent "meridional" test chart line pairs, while dotted lines represent "sagittal" test chart line pairs. Both meridional and sagittal line pairs are 45 degrees diagonal, however they are perpendicular to each other by 90 degrees. (There is a specific reason for this, which I'll get into later.) Thick lines represent the 10lp/mm test, thin lines represent the 30lp/mm test. Black lines are the MTF when the lens is tested wide open, blue lines are the MTF when the lens is stopped down to f/8.

The Magno® Travel Lamp Is a handy two-in-one light that can be used as either a desk lamp or flashlight. With a compact design and multiple lightin...

Illuminated magnifying glasses,This sleek, light magnifying glass is a perfect choice for art teachers , other educators and low vision people. If you want to buy a magnifying glass with light, know the online catalog that we have at Low Vision Miami or if you prefer, visit us at our offices.

MagnifiersGlasses

Discover the world of microscopic detail with this compact, high-performance Mini Digital Microscope.   8 built-in LED lights and HD 1080P resolu...

Magnification: 2.8x Diopter: +7D Illumination: SMD LED Lens Type: Aspheric Lens Material: PXM Plastic Lens Coating: Cera-Tec Coating Excellent ma...

This standard has been in place for years (at least 20 years, although I believe much longer than that.) While the use of diagonal line pairs still applies to test astigmatism, field curvature, and indicate boke, it is entirely possible the 30lp/mm factor is insufficient to adequately measure resolving power for lenses wide open. It is likely sufficient to measure resolving power at f/8, although something around 70lp/mm would probably be better (as maximum diffraction limited resolution at f/8 is 86lp/mm.)

They are indeed both a measure of contrast; one is simply measuring it at a much higher frequency than the other so they are measuring for different qualities.

Handy Pocket Magnifier 4x Your Compact Solution for Clearer Vision The Handy Pocket Magnifier is a versatile, multi-power LED lighted magnifier des...

Maxiaidsmagnifiers

High Quality Magnifying Lamp Large Magnifying Lamp, Wide View - Extends the visible range of the lens to 5 inches and improves magnification to 8x....

Introducing the Mobilent LED Folding Pocket Magnifier by Eschenbach – your compact solution for high-magnification needs on the go. This innovative...

How is resolving power different from contrast? As resolving power drops, so does contrast, so why measure both? A loss of contrast does not necessarily come from a loss in resolving power. A lens may indeed be capable of resolving the hard edges between every line in a test chart, be it 10lp/mm, 30lp/mm, 50lp/mm, or 100lp/mm. A lens with low contrast, however, will still be incapable of transferring white as white and black as black...those sharply resolved line pairs may all be light and dark gray, instead of white and black. So, a properly designed MTF test will use elements of relatively large detail as well as elements of relatively small detail, in order to measure both aspects of a lens, or sensor, or full optical system.

Note: Depending on the lens, these days, many at wider apertures (f/4 or wider) are quite probably capable of resolving 100lp/mm, 150lp/mm, possibly even more. One has to question, then, the validity of using a 10 & 30 lp/mm test chart to evaluate the true resolving power and contrast of such a lens. It seems to me that 30lp/mm increasingly becomes a contrast factor, rather than a resolving power factor, for such lenses. Then again, not all lenses can resolve that much detail, and if a manufacturer wishes to use a common means of measuring the quality of their lenses, there is little option than to use the lowest common denominator.

Embark on a journey with our new Mobilux series of illuminated hand-held magnifiers. Featuring state-of-the-art LED illumination technology that br...

Magnification: 3x. to 12 x. Big Lens Size. Illumination: 'Easy Glow' Non-Glare LED. Lens Aspheric Optical. 3 AAA batteries (not included). One-Yea...

Magnifiersmeaning

Resolving power is the measure of a system's ability to separate fine elements of very small detail. If a thin black line neighbors a thin white line, a lens with high resolving power will be able to accurately separate the two. Both lines should be observable in the projection from the lens. A lens with low resolving power will begin to blur the lines together, making it difficult to determine which part of the image is the black line, and which is the white line.

Generally speaking, we don't perform MTF "testing" on that level. Most MTF charts today are generated mathematically using original, precise computer models. These same computer models are also the basis for the actual manufacture of a lens. With a proper understanding of the materials used in a lenses actual manufacture, one can mathematically generate a very accurate MTF of a lens, within some fairly small margin of error.

The same rotational factor of the meridional and sagittal lines also allows Canon's MTF test to determine field curvature, which is the result of a lens focusing at a curve at focal point, rather than a literal plane, as the object being resolved moves towards the corner.

Big Magnifier European HAND HELD Besser Superbrite Offer unparalleled brightness and clarity. With extra-bright, long-life LEDs, these magnifiers p...

Magnifications: 4.0 x to 12.00 x. Optic magnifying lens. Long life LED bulbs. Clear glass lens with white plastic body. Requires 3 AAA batteries (...

Loupe Magnifier 10x Power The Loupe Stand 10x LED Lighted  1″ LED Lighted Focusing Loupe Magnifier is a 10x dual lens stand magnifier. It is a cry...

Handy pocket magnifier! The Pocket Magnifier™ with 3 Acrylic lenses 2.5x, 4.5x and 6x Power is a multi-power LED lighted magnifier. This handheld P...

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

It may be helpful to consider the numbers (10 line pairs per millimeter and 30 line pairs per millimeter) as being related to the size of the features in the scene they can reproduce. In the same way it would be difficult to reproduce fine details when drawing with a fat magic marker, 10 lp/mm may be too coarse to reproduce fine image details like hair and cloth texture.

It's also worth noting that 30 lp/mm and 10 lp/mm are fairly arbitrary (but common) choices made by some lens manufacturers. There are also plenty of optics manufacturers who use other values (such as 5, 20 and even 40 lp/mm), including Leica (Leitz), Rodenstock, Schneider and Zeiss.

Edmund scientificMagnifiers

The Bëssër Superbrite magnifiers are an invaluable tool for people living with macular degeneration. Providing an effective way to enlarge and enha...

There are quite a few other things one can glean from an MTF chart like this as well. By using perpendicularly opposed sets of line pairs, meridional and sagittal, additional factors about a lens can be tested. Diagonal line pairs test the lens from center to corner, for all four corners. This allows astigmatism, which is a discrepancy in the point at which a lens resolves that is dependent on the rotational angle of the lens. In a lens with astigmatism, something that resolves properly at the sensor plane (focus plane) at 45 degrees may resolve forward or backward of the focus plane at 135 degrees.

In any and every transfer, there is a loss of information. To fully and very accurately measure the performance of a full optical system, one would need to compute the MTF of each and every element that affects the transmission of light from its origin in the scene to its reception by the sensor. If we break down an entire scene...we would have the air between our subject and the lens. The lens is a complex entity, containing anywhere from a few to well over a dozen elements. Between each element or element group is some other medium...air, an optical glue, the diaphragm. Between the rear-most element and the sensor is another pocket of air. Between that air and the sensor itself is a stack of filters, one designed to cut off infrared frequencies, and a matched pair to blur spatial frequencies in proximity to a certain threshold. The sensor itself has a layer of microlenses, and below the microlenses is a layer of RGB filters. Additionally, the orientation of the image projected by the lens relative to the orientation of the pixels on the sensor ALSO factors into the transfer function. Only after light has passed through this entire stack of transfer mediums is the final signal realized.

The 30 lines per mm test will test the limits of the resolution of your lens, while the 10 lines per mm measurement will not really do so; your lens should have plenty of resolution to get a good measurement at that much lower granularity test. What generally affects the 10 lines per mm test is more general contrast reduction in the lens which may be caused by flare, fogging/impure surfaces or any reflections.

The Illuminated Handheld Serie Low Cost. Aspheric LED Lighted Magnifier is a 4x, 5x, 7x aspheric magnifier. Aspheric lens magnifiers allow for incr...

Discover the superior craftsmanship of Eschenbach Optik's Easy Pocket Magnifiers, expertly crafted in Germany for unparalleled clarity and portabil...

In real-world terms, a "large" element of detail is 0.1mm in size (10lp/mm), while a "small" element of detail is 0.0333mm in size (30lp/mm). A large element is expected to be fully resolved, where as a small element may not fully resolve, depending on the resolving power of the lens. A large element is thus capable of being used to measure global contrast (more on this in a moment), and a small element is thus capable of being used to directly measure the resolving power of a lens.

There are a lot of things we can garner from the MTF chart above. Ignoring the dotted lines for the moment, both wide open and at f/8, this lens performs extremely well (by the standard established when Canon first put their 10 & 30 lp/mm test chart into use). At f/8 (blue lines), the lens continues to perform quite well right into the corner, with the exception of the sagittal test case, where IQ drops to 0.6 and below by the corner. Resolving power (thin lines) is near maximum for f/8, however it drops off fairly quickly for both meridional and sagittal planes, producing results that are only good or poor anywhere but the center.

But yes, despite this difference in how we perceive their effect in an image, with an MTF graph, both figures do measure contrast reproduction.

The quality of background blur (boke) can also be gleaned from an MTF chart like this. The quality of falloff for the MTF curves as they approach the edge is an indication of how smooth a blur circle will be. If the curves oscillate up and down as they fall off, the quality of a blur circle will probably be poor. A smooth falloff would indicate better blur circles.

I'm trying to learn to read MTF charts. Everything is making sense to me, except why most explanations of MTF will refer to the 10 l/mm line as a measure of contrast while referring to the 30 l/mm line as a measure of resolution?

Multi Hand-Held Magnifier is a 3-in-1   LED lighted handheld magnifier. Set includes one lighted handle, one 2x power 110mm rimless round acrylic l...

Magnifier Perfect to see small details The Economy line of illuminated magnifiers provide magnification and for near spotting tasks. The Pendant...