LW Scientific Laboratory Microscopes - Binocular and ... - binocular vs trinocular
iso 10110-7
UV-vis spectroscopy works well on liquids and solutions, but if the sample is more of a suspension of solid particles in liquid, the sample will scatter the light more than absorb the light and the data will be very skewed. Most UV-vis instruments can analyze solid samples or suspensions with a diffraction apparatus (Figure \(\PageIndex{7}\)), but this is not common. UV-vis instruments generally analyze liquids and solutions most efficiently.
This page titled 4.4: UV-Visible Spectroscopy is shared under a CC BY 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Pavan M. V. Raja & Andrew R. Barron (OpenStax CNX) via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform.
mil-c-675
A blank reference will be needed at the very beginning of the analysis of the solvent to be used (water, hexanes, etc), and if concentration analysis needs to be performed, calibration solutions need to be made accurately. If the solutions are not made accurately enough, the actual concentration of the sample in question will not be accurately determined.
In contrast, the U.S. has failed to embrace this ISO standard, and there are some understandable reasons why. As a rule, the ISO optical standard format leaves a lot to be desired (Figure 1). In some ways, the standard is outdated; i.e., surface figure is still specified relative to a test plate. (Most modern interferometers have software to deal with this, but the ISO method for specifying surface form is based on outdated ideas. In addition to not saving time, old test plates can sometimes contain substantial surface form and radius errors. Those errors are not well accounted for by ISO 10110 and can easily propagate into manufactured parts. An easy work-around this issue is to add a radius tolerance to the Radius of Curvature callout in the drawing. This is generally recommended because radius errors are critical. Customers should not assume that a supplier’s test plates are good.) Other issues include formatting that is restrictive, and prism and cube beamsplitter specifications that are rather awkward. This often deters designing engineers. Also, the surface quality callouts can become very complex. This deters suppliers. Another issue with ISO 10110 is that its surface inspection, much like the dimensioned Scratch/Dig standards, requires the use of a microscope to do it properly. Dedicated software that can quickly calculate the size and dimensions of surface defects then becomes necessary; a fully integrated and dedicated system can be an outstanding tool, but such systems can also be very expensive. Many U.S. shops, due to low demand for the standard, have yet to invest in these types of inspection systems. Without them, inspection per the ISO can be incredibly slow and a major cost driver.
Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy is used to obtain the absorbance spectra of a compound in solution or as a solid. What is actually being observed spectroscopically is the absorbance of light energy or electromagnetic radiation, which excites electrons from the ground state to the first singlet excited state of the compound or material. The UV-vis region of energy for the electromagnetic spectrum covers 1.5 - 6.2 eV which relates to a wavelength range of 800 - 200 nm. The Beer-Lambert Law, Equation \ref{1} , is the principle behind absorbance spectroscopy. For a single wavelength, A is absorbance (unitless, usually seen as arb. units or arbitrary units), ε is the molar absorptivity of the compound or molecule in solution (M-1cm-1), b is the path length of the cuvette or sample holder (usually 1 cm), and c is the concentration of the solution (M).
mil-prf-13830b pdf
UV-vis spectroscopic data can give qualitative and quantitative information of a given compound or molecule. Irrespective of whether quantitative or qualitative information is required it is important to use a reference cell to zero the instrument for the solvent the compound is in. For quantitative information on the compound, calibrating the instrument using known concentrations of the compound in question in a solution with the same solvent as the unknown sample would be required. If the information needed is just proof that a compound is in the sample being analyzed, a calibration curve will not be necessary; however, if a degradation study or reaction is being performed, and concentration of the compound in solution is required, thus a calibration curve is needed.
mil-c-48497
The material the cuvette (the sample holder) is made from will also have a UV-vis absorbance cutoff. Glass will absorb all of the light higher in energy starting at about 300 nm, so if the sample absorbs in the UV, a quartz cuvette will be more practical as the absorbance cutoff is around 160 nm for quartz (Table \(\PageIndex{2}\)).
surface quality 60-40
C7641866
All of these instruments have a light source (usually a deuterium or tungsten lamp), a sample holder and a detector, but some have a filter for selecting one wavelength at a time. The single beam instrument (Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\)) has a filter or a monochromator between the source and the sample to analyze one wavelength at a time. The double beam instrument (Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\)) has a single source and a monochromator and then there is a splitter and a series of mirrors to get the beam to a reference sample and the sample to be analyzed, this allows for more accurate readings. In contrast, the simultaneous instrument (Figure \(\PageIndex{3}\)) does not have a monochromator between the sample and the source; instead, it has a diode array detector that allows the instrument to simultaneously detect the absorbance at all wavelengths. The simultaneous instrument is usually much faster and more efficient, but all of these types of spectrometers work well.
The LibreTexts libraries are Powered by NICE CXone Expert and are supported by the Department of Education Open Textbook Pilot Project, the UC Davis Office of the Provost, the UC Davis Library, the California State University Affordable Learning Solutions Program, and Merlot. We also acknowledge previous National Science Foundation support under grant numbers 1246120, 1525057, and 1413739. Legal. Accessibility Statement For more information contact us at info@libretexts.org.
Every solvent has a UV-vis absorbance cutoff wavelength. The solvent cutoff is the wavelength below which the solvent itself absorbs all of the light. So when choosing a solvent be aware of its absorbance cutoff and where the compound under investigation is thought to absorb. If they are close, chose a different solvent. Table \(\PageIndex{1}\) provides an example of solvent cutoffs.
To make a calibration curve, at least three concentrations of the compound will be needed, but five concentrations would be most ideal for a more accurate curve. The concentrations should start at just above the estimated concentration of the unknown sample and should go down to about an order of magnitude lower than the highest concentration. The calibration solutions should be spaced relatively equally apart, and they should be made as accurately as possible using digital pipettes and volumetric flasks instead of graduated cylinders and beakers. An example of absorbance spectra of calibration solutions of Rose Bengal (4,5,6,7-tetrachloro-2',4',5',7'-tetraiodofluorescein, Figure \(\PageIndex{4}\), can be seen in Figure \(\PageIndex{5}\). To make a calibration curve, the value for the absorbances of each of the spectral curves at the highest absorbing wavelength, is plotted in a graph similar to that in Figure \(\PageIndex{6}\) of absorbance versus concentration. The correlation coefficient of an acceptable calibration is 0.9 or better. If the correlation coefficient is lower than that, try making the solutions again as the problem may be human error. However, if after making the solutions a few times the calibration is still poor, something may be wrong with the instrument; for example, the lamps may be going bad.
To obtain reliable data, the peak of absorbance of a given compound needs to be at least three times higher in intensity than the background noise of the instrument. Obviously using higher concentrations of the compound in solution can combat this. Also, if the sample is very small and diluting it would not give an acceptable signal, there are cuvettes that hold smaller sample sizes than the 2.5 mL of a standard cuvettes. Some cuvettes are made to hold only 100 μL, which would allow for a small sample to be analyzed without having to dilute it to a larger volume, lowering the signal to noise ratio.