Never show it again. ok. calc-logo. Lens Calculator. Calculate CCTV camera lens focal length, pixel density and camera zones in 3D.

The visibility of faint DSO ‘s under LP skies surprised me a bit. The 120 does a better job than I expected. Would you say the 120 does a better resolving job on big Globulars? I certainly didn't when I started this little game. The world wide advertised wide field view of the 150 was not as spectacular as I thought it to be. On the whole other differences were not as large as I expected they would be. The 150 does a better job (exept for planets) than most people think. On the other hand the 120 is quite capable of showing DSO’s in comparison with her bigger brother.

Quite some quality differences established in official tests. From 0.33 to 0.8. The instrument discussed has a Strehl between 0.7 and 0.75

Achromatdefinition

Apples and pears are both fruit. Comparisons between the two are normally not done. Different taste, shape and bite. Still, we do it all the time. Consumers know the differences. Why bother for a difference test?

by J Dickmann · 2023 · Cited by 13 — The two-mirror system forms an optical resonator with a free spectral range of 760 pm and a Finesse of ~300. To guarantee a high reflectivity of ...

Achromatpronunciation

150mm permitting larger exit pupil at same magnification. Light-consuming filters are easier to use. Low magnification is easier obtained in 150 mm.

- Zeiss barlow 2X. Outstanding quality. Works as 2,33X in combination with the Leica as a result of a larger projection distance, due to the adapter.

Achromatic lens for telescope

The Avantes AvaSpec-Mini2048CL Spectrometer is for sale on labmakelaar.eu. Curious about the specifications?

Achromatic doublet lens

The idea of testing and comparing the two was born during a long period of clear nights, approximately twelve or so. I got used to using one telescope and the other every other day. After a while I took them both out. For comparing them. No scientific aspirations. Just for fun. From the amateurs point of view. If I write them down, would anyone be interested? I thought it could be fun to share my findings with you. Maybe my writings here could be a decision point for someone. Here we go.

In my humble opinion the main differences we all know ( widefield, planets , double stars and Chromatic aberration) are quite clear.

The Leica, in combination with the barlow, could take the 150 mm up to 197X and 236X in the 120 mm. Which lead to exit pupils of 0.76mm in the achromat and 0.51 mm in the apo. An extension tube can take magnification further up for use on very close double stars.

Comparisons were attempted while having an equal exit pupil on both instruments. Which means equally bright / dark sky background. As the 120 could be taken further up, the sky background could be darkened even more. Exit pupils of 0.4 mm to 0.3 mm. Of course I tried. In most cases this did not lead to better views except for double stars or some planetary nebulae. On the other hand, the possibility of zooming meant that magnification could be adjusted to reach the most favorable view given the atmospheric circumstances, such as transparancy.

In the 120mm the core of M3, M92, M13 seems better resolved, more contrast; a bit sharper. In the 150 they seem a tad brighter though. This is at exitpupil 0.6mm and magnification 200X.

Underlying comparison was made out of curiosity. What are the real differences we ( I ) take for granted every time I use my telescopes? Are they as severe as common knowledge tells us? Some differences were obvious, some were not

Exchange-rates.org has been a leading provider of currency, cryptocurrency and precious metal prices for nearly 20 years. Our information is trusted by millions of users across the globe each month . We have been featured in some of the most prestigious financial publications in the world including Business Insider, Investopedia, Washington Post, and CoinDesk.

The BHD/USD rate is up +0.03% in the last six months. This means the Bahraini Dinar has increased in value compared to the US Dollar.

G4, G7, G8 or G9, the meter is communicating. X, the meter is non-communicating. Any other alphanumeric characters, it's an old-generation meter. Hydro‑Québec ...

20.9 MP. 11 fps. SD card slot. Up to 4K/30p and 1080 ... Z50II. Incredible features. Inspiring creative ... Z series cameras have the widest lens mount of any full ...

REAL PRO 7x Telephoto Lens / Monocular. Hot. This lens is designed to be attached to smart phone or tablets with built-in camera to get 7x magnified images.

Calculated 150mm gain in magnitude ( 0,48 ) is partly lost on sharpness (0,2 gain observed) and partly on glare. On the other hand big open clusters fit in easier in the FOV. of the 150 mm.

Check out the BHD to USD history rates below. This is the Bahraini Dinar (BHD) to US Dollar (USD) exchange rate history summary page with 180 days of BHD to USD rate historical data from May 27, 2024 to November 22, 2024

Achromatturntable mat

We partner with leading data providers to bring you the latest and most accurate prices for all major currencies, cryptocurrencies and precious metals. The currency, cryptocurrency and precious metals prices displayed on our site are aggregated from millions of data points and pass through proprietary algorithms in order to deliver timely and accurate prices to our users.

Achromatic color

This chart shows data from 2024-5-27 to 2024-11-22. The BHD/USD rate is up +0.03% in the last six months. This means the Bahraini Dinar has increased in value compared to the US Dollar.

The 150mm peeks at exitpupil 0.7mm and magnification 200+. At equal 0.6mm exitpupils the image in the 150mm seems a little bit darker.

*The contents of this user`s manual ... Please carefully read this operation manual ... Installation of Linear Actuator and Controller Connector: When inserting an ...

Jun 4, 2023 — Page 1 of 4 - Orthoscopic Eyepieces - posted in Eyepieces: Ive been doing astronomy now over 40 years and back in the day, orthoscopics were ...

As expected the star test reveals a more textbook diffraction pattern in the 120mm. Even if the usual CA in the f/5 is ruled out by a green filter.

2022318 — The venue will be run by René van den Oort, who owns Beautiful Beers in St John's Street, and his son Max, 25, will work on the bar. René ...

What is an achromatic lens used for

On the limits of visibility.The difference with the background sky is barely visible. Techniques: hood/ dark adapted eye, averted vision, slewing/movement, zooming, observation at highest point.

Come join the friendliest, most engaging and inclusive astronomy forum geared for beginners and advanced telescope users, astrophotography devotees, plus check out our "Astro" goods vendors.

I listed the objects / subjects in random order. Each item can score 5 points. I considered a 10 point scale, but that does not give better insight. If the score was even I divided equally. One could argue about some points given but the overall picture is clear. Some observations like the one of Jupiter and the Veil observation were done in July / August 2019.

Achromatlenses

Oct 19, 2023 — A microscope is an instrument that can be used to observe small objects, even cells. The image of an object is magnified through at least ...

2.6 degrees vs 3.1 degrees with the available 31mm Baader eyepiece. No top images though with the Baader. More often used is 1.7 degrees in the 120 and 2.2 degrees in the 150 mm.

M105, NGC3384, M65 etc in Leo, M51, Messier 84 - 88 , M104 etc. Small differences seen can be allocated to differences in transparency of the sky.

Rosette as a whole, Veil nebula. The wide field of view gives an enormous impression. Much dark sky around the object. The 150 mm wins this one.

150mm is definitely no Jupiter telescope. Saturn is somewhat better. Mars is more satisfying. Barely differences on Uranus or Neptune.

Details, sharpness, contrast, seeing, color. Quite a difference. The 120 shows 6 versus 2 craterlets on Plato floor. Far better defined ejecta. Darker shadows.

- Baader Hyperion 32 mm, this eyepiece is not capable of handling a f/5 light-cone, no round stars at the edge of the field. Even the f/7.5 cone of the 120mm is a bit to steep.

Who is online:Registered users: Acrab, Baurice, BigKahuna, Bing [Bot], DMouse, goldstar, Google [Bot], helicon, I Am Marsha, John Baars, KathyNS, Majestic-12 [Bot], Pikaia, rwillitt, Semrush [Bot], StarHugger, Unitron48

Come join the friendliest, most engaging and inclusive astronomy forum geared for beginners and advanced telescope users, astrophotography devotees, plus check out our "Astro" goods vendors.