Achromatic lens - achromatisch

 2024-09-15 21:54:30

There are different types of LEDs on the market. Single point high power ones ($1$-$3~\rm W$) with viewing angles $40$ to $160$ degrees (the angle at which the light cone expands out) or some even higher power arrays of diodes : $5~\rm W$+

Laser apertureprojector

This question appears to be about engineering, which is the application of scientific knowledge to construct a solution to solve a specific problem. As such, it is off topic for this site, which deals with the science, whether theoretical or experimental, of how the natural world works. For more information, see this meta post.

I'm new to this forum. This is half a question, half a challenge. And it's more engineering then physics but I thought I might get good insights from a physics forum.

In all cases, the actual light emmiting part is generally square and very small, then it is encapsulated in another package.

How would you go about doing this? From lenses to mirrors, to what type of led to use, there's pretty much an infinite different ways to approach this and I needed to get the idea out there, so others could share their insight.

LenoxlaserOrifice

You have accepted a quote and it is currently available in your cart. Please complete the order processing to add an item to the cart.

A couple things: this site is not specifically for engineering questions, so there's a small chance this may be closed by mods.

NewportAperture

I would like to cure a UV activated resin using a collimated $390$ to $420~\rm nm$ light source. The area I need to cure is $3$" ($7.5~\rm nm$) by $3$". ( although the light beam can be bigger then this area and of any shape) so long as it's collimated and as efficient and low cost as possible. I want to get at least $3$ watts of light power over that area and it has to have light everywhere and ideally as evenly distributed as possible. Ouff!

Or low power $5$mm diameter ones with witch I could build a large array of evenly spaced LEDs. ( but not necessarily) these have viewing angles of $25$ to $160$ degrees.

Irisaperture

GE HealthCare will accept, for return from customer, items that are in new condition, unworn, unaltered and free of damage. Items cannot be returned or exchanged beyond 30 days from customer’s receipt of the original order and all returned items will be subject to a 15% restocking fee. To obtain a full refund or exchange of the item within the 30 day return period (subject to the 15% restocking fee) customer must request a return materials authorization (RMA) from GE HealthCare and return the item to GE HealthCare utilizing this RMA number. Items must be returned in the original packaging, unused and free of damage.Please note, cuffs, BP items, sterile and hazmat items cannot be returned. If a replacement order is requested, the restocking fee may be waived at GE HealthCare’s sole discretion.

Second, many commercial high-power LED's are listed not by luminous flux, but by nominal diode power consumption; a 1 watt LED actually emits far less than 1 watt of radiant power, so you'll need to think about what radiant flux you actually need.

Optical apertures

EDIT: I intend to pass the light through an LCD screen before hitting the resin. Which brings me to another question. At these wavelength, will diffraction come I to play if the LCD "holes " the light is passing through are 100 microns large?

I've just recalled a question very like yours Is there any optical component that uniformizes the incoming light? and my answer to it is here.

You can also get 410 nm ones, although they're a little less efficient (although power efficiency is probably not an issue unless your unit is battery-powered).

Third, what is the wavelength range that the resin is usable over? 400 nm is sort of at the border of violet and UV. I've seen some resins that cure at "royal blue" wavelengths; this has the advantage that commercial InGaN high-power emitters are very efficient at 450 nm, with energy-to-light efficiencies approaching 50%; for example, see this very cheap 500 mW emitter. If that's usable, you can buy a few of them for $10-20. The site also sells optics specifically designed for being attached to these emitters to collimate the light.

Numericalaperture

Don't know your approval number? Call 800-437-1171Enter opt 1 for the first three prompts, and have your System ID available.If you add item(s) to cart and submit your order without the approval number, GE will contact you before your order can be confirmed for shipment.

Customer agrees that products purchased from the GE HealthCare Service Shop will only be used in operating and servicing medical equipment at a healthcare facility located in the United States in which it was intended, and will not be otherwise used for manufacturing, resale or other distribution.

Time is valuable when it comes to patient care. Service Shop, from GE HealthCare, makes ordering faster and easier than ever before, so you can focus on what matters the most - patient care.

AdjustableAperture

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Put simply: the main factors here are that if you design your collimation optics to collimate output from the centre of the chip (i.e. a light emitted from a point on the chip centre will become an on-axis plane wave at the collimator output), light from point sources at the sides of the chip will be mapped to slanted plane waves. The angular spread is then of the order of $w / f$, where $w$ is the LED chip's width and $f$ the focal length of the system. You can make this spread smaller by increasing $f$, but then the collimated beam becomes very wide and low intensity and the optics begin to get very big if you don't want to lose light. This may or may not be a problem.

Aspherical lens can be used for LEDs for collimation. Further, to obtain unform illumination, one may need to use diffusers. I am also working on a similar problem however , yet to figure out the solution. Remember , LCD screens will transmit only 3-6% of UV (https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/high-UV-transmission-6-inch-1620_1600083826017.html). Hence , in order to get 3W irradiance on the surface of your LCD screen. You need to select the number of LEDs accordingly. You can also try out different algorithms to verify your illumination pattern.

Now the above doesn't rule out some fancy future active technology that can truly collimate an LED chip's output, needing work input of $k_B\,T\,\log 2$ joules for each bit of light state forgotten in accordance with the Landauer Principle form of the second law of thermodynamics. I say more about this in my answer here.

Laser Aperturemachine

You can see the second law form more clearly with the following argument. If your LED chip were a blackbody radiator, and if you could make an arbitrarily narrow collimated beam from it, you could focus all the blackbody radiation in the collimated beam down onto a much smaller spot than the chip. The smaller spot's temperature would rise until steady state were reached, i.e. the power into the chip were equal to that radiated back. By the Stefan-Boltzmann law, if the image were smaller than the LED chip, the image would need to be at a higher temperature than the source to balance power flows, and this violates the Carnot/Clausius statement of second law of thermodynamics that heat cannot continuously, spontaneously be shifted from a lower temperature body to a higher temperature one.

The above is an imaging optics argument, but the idea is very general as we're stepping into the optical version of the second law of thermodynamics. In optical terms this is that the source's optical grasp (sometimes called optical extent or étendue) cannot be lowered by passive optical processing. Optical grasp is roughly the angular spread of a beam multiplied by the beam's width (why the simple word "optical spread" never took hold is beyond me and testament to how badly we English-speaking scientists treat our mother tongue). So you can see my imaging optics argument working here again: you can lower the angular spread in a beam at the expense of widening it. Of course you can simply throw away most of the beam if you want the beam narrow, but the system becomes highly inefficient. So you need to do some calculations to see what works for your application.

Don't know your approval number? Call 800-437-1171Enter opt 1 for the first three prompts, and have your System ID available.If you add item(s) to cart and submit your order without selecting an approver, GE will contact you before your order can be confirmed for shipment.

Also, although the problem makes sense to me maybe I failed to share it with you appropriately, feel free to ask questions or clarifications!

One cannot collimate light from an LED accurately without loosing a great deal of light and / or being happy with a very wide collimated beam, because the source is often quite a wide extended source (sometimes up to 1mm across). This may or may not be a helpful answer depending on exactly what you mean by collimated, i.e. how accurately you need to collimate, or, otherwise put, what the acceptable angular spread of your "collimated" output is and how much light you're willing to lose. You will need to do some calculations to find out.