AFIMAC Workforce Security & Executive Protection Training ... AFIMAC training seminars give security professionals skills in conflict resolution, protective ...

Fire & Emergency Safety Sign: Muster Point (numbered) Number: 8 24" x 30" Engineer Grade Reflective Aluminum (.080) 1/Each - FRR9158RA

Sensitive body areas include the “chest/heart area,” but later is only identified as the “chest area.” These are not synonymous! In another section, the Model Policy warns ECW users to avoid these areas in “probes or activation” modes and later it says, “preferred probe target location” and also directs in the same paragraph, the ECW “should not be intentionally aimed at a sensitive area . . .” which includes the chest. Per this Model Policy, a drive stun to the “chest area” is not preferred. This conflates a touch/contact stun to a “drive stun.” Even a probe striking the chest area when following the “split the beltline” targeting paradigm would not be preferred. Again, consider how prosecutors and plaintiffs’ attorneys can use this language against the ECW user whose probe or drive stun contacted the “chest area.”

He said there are no long-lasting effects from the use of a Taser compared to weapons like pepper spray or a baton. He said a Taser jolt lasts for five seconds, versus pepper spray, which can be painful for an hour or more.

In October 2017, a man in Lower Sackville was trying to harm himself so officers used a stun gun on him, but it "appeared to have minimal effect as the AP (Affected Party) continued to be combative," said a SIRT report.

Taser for women

Lombard wants police forces across the country to cut down on how often they use all their weapons. She said communication is key.

Lastly, most of us cannot possibly know who “appears [to be] users of internal cardiac devices.” Even Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officers ask people to tell them if they have an internal defibrillator or other implanted device so they can be “wanded.”

In September 2017, a Cape Breton, N.S., man also died after a stun gun didn't work. The man was trying to harm himself by jumping from an overpass, and a Cape Breton Regional Police officer fired his Taser to try to immobilize him. It struck the man but but didn't stop him, and an instant later, he died by suicide, according to a report by Nova Scotia's police watchdog, the Serious Incident Response Team (SIRT).

• Electricity is a weapon. Per the ECW Concepts and Issues paper, TASER ECW inventor, Jack Cover, experimented with “electricity as a weapon.” While some folks may argue this is somewhat accurate, imagine a prosecuting or plaintiff’s attorney telling a jury that electricity is a weapon per the IACP ECW Model Policy. Many laypeople, including jurors, are highly misinformed about ECWs. They only know what they have seen on television, in a movie, read online or in print, and from testimony they heard that ECWs deliver 50,000 volts. Per the IACP, all ECWs use electricity as a weapon. To clarify, electricity itself is not a weapon, but it is used as a component in weapons such as ECWs.

The ECW Model Policy and supporting Concepts and Issues paper are filled with definitions, some of which are inaccurate, poorly defined or simply not defined. For example, the term “deploy” is not defined and, in some jurisdictions, can include removing from the holster or presentation compliance. Similarly, the term Anti-Felon Identification (AFID) tags claims they are “Confetti-like pieces of paper [which is only partially correct] installed on ECW devices that are expelled from the cartridge when deployed.” However, when AFIDs are present, they are in the cartridges and not installed on the ECW devices, and not all ECWs contain AFIDs (think TASER 10, Ultron 2).

• Notifying a supervisor: The previous third example deserves a fuller explanation about the requirement to notify a supervisor. First, as the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) has reported, most police departments in the United States are small, with 46% of all local police departments employing fewer than ten FTE (Full-Time Equivalent) sworn officers and far more than 50% have less than 25 FTE officers, with several agencies working one or two person shifts and some only working part-time. If there is not a supervisor rank or not one working a shift, the default is apparently to contact the Chief of Police after each ECW use which can include presentation compliance. After notification, per the 2023 Model Policy, “. . .Supervisors have a responsibility for ensuring accountability from their officers . . . Supervisors should:

Another label, “pregnant,” is also a slippery one. The IACP model policy fails to distinguish a person who is “visibly pregnant” from one who is two weeks pregnant.

While there is no such thing as a “perfect [law enforcement force option] policy,” this trusted saying applies to the numerous land mines hidden in plain sight within the new 2023 IACP “Electronic Control Weapons” (ECWs) Model Policy and the Concepts and Issues supporting document which were recently released. This September 2023 Model Policy replaces the IACP’s March 2018 version. As an Associate Member of the IACP, this article is not to devalue the work of the IACP, but rather to alert public safety administrators, trainers, risk managers, and users of ECWs that “blind adoption” of this Model Policy may throw them “under the legal attacks bus.” The possible results are more high-profile, unfavorable, costly, and career ending discipline; civil litigations; and criminal prosecutions against ECW users, trainers, administrators, and government employers. From a risk management perspective, do not thoughtlessly adopt this Model Policy without first considering some significant rehabilitation.

Axon said when a person is not incapacitated by a Taser it is usually because one of the required conditions for the weapon's functionality are not met.

"Some fields cannot afford any real margin of error," said Oriola. "Within a field such as policing you've got to get it right practically all of the time, and this is where those tensions arise. This tool still needs further refinement."

• Inaccurate force legal standards: Per the 2023 Model Policy, ECW users can “. . . use only the force that is objectively reasonable under the totality of the circumstances known to the officer at the time [emphasis added]. . .  .” First, this does not include officers’ force analyzed under the Eighth Amendment “cruel and unusual punishment” standard. More importantly, this is patently a misstatement of Graham v. Connor (1989), and its progeny, including Lombardo v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, — U.S. —, 210 L. Ed. 2d 609, 141 S. Ct. 2239 (2021), which can foreseeably harm officers in legal proceedings. The standard is not what is known to the officer at the time force was used, but rather what was reasonably perceived by the officer at the time force was used. This is a major error which slipped by the authors and reviewers of this erroneous Model Policy. This significant inaccuracy conflicts with the clearly established law; with legal decisions; with many agencies’ force policies and guidelines; and with ECW and parallel force option training. Administrators and trainers must recognize this error and others before impulsively adopting and/or training on this new Model Policy.

When one of the darts, also called probes, doesn't strike the person, the electric circuit can't be formed and the person isn't immobilized, said Knapman. Loose-fitting clothing can keep the probes from reaching a person, preventing the weapon from working.

Stun gun vs Taser

Tasers are used any time an officer feels they or the public are going to be seriously hurt by someone, said Knapman. If an officer is in that kind of danger, they could also draw their gun. In fact, if an officer is alone in that kind of situation, they would draw their gun and not their Taser.

2023410 — Puncture wounds, cuts, and bruises are common injuries following a shock from a Taser or stun gun. In rare cases, Tasers can damage kidney ...

• Evidence Collection: Section H of the Model Policy focuses exclusively on “Evidence Collection.” Per this section, “Officers will collect all evidence of the encounter . . . [and] shall collect the cartridge, wire leads, darts, and anti-felon identification markers (AFIDs) . . .  .” Regardless of weather conditions (think blowing wind, rain, snow, etc.), the officer “will collect” AFIDs among other items. This appears to be an example of non-ECW practitioners writing policy which sounds good on paper, but is hard to follow and very rarely done in practice.

"It is an electrical device, there are times it can fail for multiple reasons … we can't rely on that one tool, we have to have multiple options," said Knapman. "All our tools have the possibility of failing, even our firearms."

Debunking some of the most common myths about TASER energy weapons. Will a TASER energy weapon electrocute me? What actually IS a TASER weapon? How dangerous ...

Highest legal stun gun voltage

Prescribed traffic control devices which councils are not authorised to install on the network they manage. This category includes signs such as speed zoning ...

"There's a really big difference between being administered an electromagnetic shock and being dealt a fatal blow from a firearm," said Lombard.

In the hands of police, stun guns like Tasers are designed to save lives, but when the weapons don't incapacitate someone there can be fatal consequences — from officers using lethal force to a person continuing to harm themselves.

On June 12, officers responded to a complaint of an unwanted person at a home near Miramichi, N.B., according to an RCMP spokesperson. When they arrived, RCMP said, they faced Levi, who was holding knives.

This article provides an overview of Axon Fleet 3 Dashboard ... Download PDF. Dashboard overview - Fleet on DeX. This article provides an ...

But the success rate isn't high enough for Temitope Oriola, a criminology professor who studied stun guns at the University of Alberta in Edmonton. He said he doesn't know of anyone tracking how often stun gun failures lead to police using deadly force.

Howdoes a Taserworkon the body

In an email, the company said police forces need to clearly identify why a Taser doesn't work and if it was caused by environmental or situational factors versus a weapon error. Figuring out the cause of the failure will determine whether more officer training is needed or if a weapon needs to be serviced.

In investigating the suicide in Cape Breton, for instance, SIRT concluded that one of the Taser's darts entered the man's back, while the other landed in the hem of his shorts and did not penetrate his skin.

Department of Justice's Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office), conducted research in 2013 on the use of body-worn cameras . This research ...

TASER self defense

Unfortunately, space limitation does not permit a full detailed analysis and corresponding explanations of the 2023 ECW Model Policy which means administrators, trainers and/or ECW users must carefully read it in context and in sync with current established science, clearly established law and operational considerations, and then identify concerns and conflicts with existing policy, guidelines, procedures, training, and other relevant documents. A major risk management concern is how the Model Policy can be used against municipalities, administrators, trainers, and/or ECW users during criminal and/or civil legal actions. Too often, expert witnesses on both sides testify that the IACP, through its Model Policies, set “national standards” or “generally accepted police practices” for law enforcement agencies, administrators and officers. This is incorrect. Advocacy groups such as the IACP do not set “standards” for agencies. However, when a municipality or an agency administrator adopts a Model Policy, then it can inappropriately be conflated to an enforceable standard, with potentially severe consequences for that agency.

6. Vipertek VTS-989 ... The Vipertek VTS-989 is one of the most widely recommended stun guns on the market and our previous favorite. ... It's incredibly powerful ...

Another concern focuses on the careers of ECW users. If the IACP ECW Model Policy is blindly adopted or unofficially used by a municipality, administrator and/or trainers, violations of it can arguably lead to it being used as a predicate for career-ending discipline, criminal prosecution or civil litigation. Union stewards and members will want to obtain and read the ECW Model Policy and then mandate for its modification to parallel extant force legal standards, update agency policy, guidelines, procedures, training, and, where necessary, to update existing ECW use protocols. A robust discussion should produce contemporary, positive and practical results.

Howdoes a Taser feel

Nova Scotia RCMP say stun guns are effective 87 per cent of the time at making a person comply with police orders, including instances when the weapon is simply drawn and not fired. Last year, its officers in the province drew their stun guns 59 times, firing them in 17 cases.

In New Brunswick and in Nova Scotia, at least two people have died in recent years after the weapons didn't immobilize them.

View this 28" Large Orange Cone and our large selection of other Election Day, ADA compliant items at Inclusion Solutions.

Nov 11, 2024 — so go away from the circle here. now you'll see the 1 AA battery inside. the positive side is going away from the circle. push it towards the ...

"The family continues to be in deep mourning. You know, there's essentially zero feedback on what's happening, no sharing of evidence. [They] let the family sit there and percolate in their absolute grief wondering what the hell happened and how the heck it could have happened."

They tried to use a Taser on Levi multiple times. But it didn't immobilize him, and he was shot and killed by an officer. It's not clear why the Taser didn't work. A coroner's inquest has been ordered into Levi's death.

Stun guns work by firing a pair of darts attached to wires. When the darts connect with a person's body they form an electric circuit. The wires carry a jolt of electricity that causes an uncontrollable muscle contraction that usually immobilizes someone, forcing them to the ground.

In September 2018, there was another incident in Lower Sackville where the RCMP responded to a report of a woman becoming violent after taking drugs. Officers fired a stun gun at her, and the darts struck her midsection and leg. She was momentarily stunned, then removed one of the darts, ending the effects of the weapon.

Despite the limitations, Knapman said, Tasers and other stun guns are an excellent tool and make police work much safer for officers and the public. He said in some cases a Taser can safely resolve what might otherwise be a lethal encounter.

• Elevated Risk Population Groups: Axon International, Inc. (Axon) and the IACP Model Policy both caution against using an ECW on populations which are potentially at greater risk of injury or death. However, neither the manufacturer nor the IACP provide exacting definitions for each group. In short, the liability may be placed onto the agency, agency trainers and ECW users. However, the Model Policy definition of “Elevated risk population groups” is concerning because it may ambiguously include or exclude certain individuals. This group consists of “. . . those who reasonably appear or are known to be elderly, medically infirm, pregnant, users of internal cardiac devices, or who have low body mass, such as small children.”

The IACP is an excellent organization and I’m proud to be a member, but the 2023 ECW Model Policy is similar to another deficient one it published in 2009 that, by its own ECW definition, did not include TASER devices. The IACP must quickly rewrite the 2023 ECW Model Policy to correct its many inaccuracies, deficient definitions and the absence of the TASER 10. However, until then: Caveat emptor.

• Shall vs. May vs. Must: Experienced public safety administrators, trainers and employees should know that “shall” means they must do a task or procedure. In contrast, “may” is not mandatory and gives the employee decision-making discretion. The ECW Model Policy uses “shall,” “may” and “must” throughout to the potential disadvantage of administrators, trainers and employees. Knowing what task or procedure is required versus flexible versus forbidden/prohibited becomes a chore for even those employees with gifted memory. Add lay jurors to the mix and one can imagine how prosecutors and/or plaintiffs’ attorneys can focus on confusion in the minds of jurors after exacting cross-examination of employees about when they “shall,” “must” or “may” do something.

In some cases, it's not obvious why a stun gun doesn't incapacitate a person. In other cases, it's more clear: For instance, a stun gun doesn't work unless two or more of the darts it fires connect with a person.

How do tasers workdiagram

"I mean, how do you jump from one being sufficient to the other being justifiable in a matter of seconds? It doesn't make a lot of sense to me."

Current Axon ECW (effective September 20, 2022) and the IACP ECW Model Policy (September 2023) do not define “elderly.” Some time ago, a number of law enforcement professionals got together and attempted to define “elderly” only to be met with so many diverse definitions that no one definition is workable. One definition said an elderly person is “anyone retired” which could mean a 30-year-old who just sold a business for millions of dollars and is retired. Most of us who are over 50 can recall when, at age 18, we thought 30-year-olds were “old,” but no longer.

Space does not permit a full analysis of the 2023 IACP ECW Model Policy and its supporting Concepts and Issues paper, so only a select few of the potentially more serious risk management concerns are discussed. Administrators, trainers, risk managers, and/or ECW users are strongly encouraged to read and understand, in proper contexts (including critics’ potential attack points), the entirety of this new policy and make corrections to the several errors and omissions within its pages before adopting a corrected version. Like an algebra word problem, many people who read this policy may not see the hidden land mines; for others, they will be obvious. You can be sure plaintiffs’ counsel and/or prosecutors will see them and use their wording, coupled with legal and scientific inaccuracies, against their targets.

• Confusing force policy and guidelines: In its ECW Concepts and Issues supporting paper, the IACP contradicts itself about ECW user force standards. “To protect the officer, subject, or others from a reasonable perceived threat of immediate physical harm” is somewhat accurate, but it falsely implies that an ECW can ONLY be used under these very limited circumstances and specifically contradicts the Model Policy language previously discussed [emphasis added]. This contradiction is not to be lightly dismissed because there is case law about such confusing policy language.

• The new TASER® 10 ECW (released in January 2023) is not included in the policy. It is clear from the language and the descriptions used in this policy that it does not include the TASER 10 ECW. There are too many examples of this deficiency to identify and discuss here, but keep in mind that much of what is written can be used against TASER 10 ECW adopters and users.

There is also a "defensive mechanism" that can counteract the effects of a stun gun, said Knapman, but he wouldn't reveal what that was.

Can a taser kill you

Rodney Levi was one person a stun gun didn't work on. His family thinks that may have played a part in his death at the hands of police.

David Burke is a reporter in Halifax who covers everything from politics to science. His reports have been featured on The National, World Report and As it Happens, as well as the Information Morning shows in Halifax and Cape Breton.

Still, Lombard said the public needs to discuss what an appropriate use of force by police is and if those standards should change.

Tasers and other stun guns can fail for a number of reasons, according to RCMP Sgt. Wayne Knapman, the non-commissioned officer in charge of the training section for the RCMP in Nova Scotia and the senior use-of-force expert in the division.

Axon, the company that manufactures Tasers, said its weapons require two or more probes to connect with a target and they must hit sufficient muscle mass to effectively incapacitate someone.

It is a priority for CBC to create products that are accessible to all in Canada including people with visual, hearing, motor and cognitive challenges.

COPYRIGHT 2010 - 2024 POLICE AND SECURITY NEWS; ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ARTICLES, PHOTOS AND MEDIA COPYRIGHTED TO THE PUBLISHER UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED

Oriola said when stun guns don't work, the person who was hit with one can become even more agitated and lash out. He said police forces across the country use stun guns far too frequently and should focus on de-escalation, ways of calming people down to reduce the chances of conflict.

"Had that weapon been more effective than it was, then I believe that we would, obviously, have a different outcome," said Alisa Lombard, a lawyer representing Levi's family.

John G. Peters, Jr., Ph.D., is a frequent contributor to Police and Security News and is an experienced expert witness. He has seen firsthand how agency policy, guidelines and training have been used against municipalities, administrators and officers. John is a former police administrator, deputy sheriff and patrol officer. You are encouraged to copy and share this article with colleagues and others.

In Ramirez v. Escajeda, No. EP-17-CV-00193-DCG, Slip Copy, 2021 WL 1131721 (W.D. Tex., March 24, 2021), the court noted the agency’s “Use of Force . . . policy had imprecise language that left its officers to navigate two different concepts of decision-making (objective reasonableness and discretion) which appear contradictory and to some extent inconsistent with the Fourth Amendment’s objective reasonableness standard in Graham v. Connor.”Thoughtlessly adopting the 2023 IACP ECW Model Policy would also, arguably, create two or more different concepts of decision-making regarding reasonableness and discretion that, in this case, are contradictory and inconsistent with the Fourth Amendmen’s objective reasonableness standard, as exists today in “clearly established law,” rather than the basic Graham factors from 1989.

Hypothetically, in the first example, if an officer kicked a charging subject or struck the subject in the chest with an open hand to slow or stop forward movement while holding an ECW, the officer intentionally violated the Model Policy. How do you think a prosecutor and/or a plaintiff’s attorney could use these actions against the officer? The second example is a classic failure to define “close proximity to the firearm.” What is the meaning of “close proximity” and how do administrators define it, trainers teach it and agencies enforce it?

Following are several risk management issues which need thorough examination and potential adjustments to minimize potential policy complications: