During the last 23 years, the in-car video systems have served a critical role in police departments. The main purpose of police car systems is to give the law enforcement agencies the upper hand in gathering critical video evidence. The automation of the record triggers has made it possible for police chiefs and Sheriffs carry out in-car video policies even when they are not physically present. The in-car systems have some huge technological advantages over the body cameras.The integration of the police cruiser with an in-car video camera system makes both the perfect weapon against false accusations. Taking full advantage of the car platform has allowed police in-car video cameras to use the excellent electrical systems that are now present in the police pursuit vehicle. The batteries in the cars are very stable for running un-interrupted a high-quality police in-car video recording accessories. There is no limit to how long the battery can run in a car since it has the generator, gas engine connected to it. This allows the in-car video system to record continuously. This key advantage allows the event to be captured before the officer hits the trigger to start the recording.

The in-car camera system is now the most efficient way to collect evidence against criminals, while on an incident. The side effect is that it makes the officers perform at a higher level while they are on duty. Police chiefs often comment that the officers are more alert while the police car video camera is recording. Citizen complaints now can be efficiently eliminated after watching the videos at the police station.

Ok, so you're not the best at remembering facts or faces, being an officer you meet a thousand people a day and it's hard to remember all the facts. Presto, that is one of the biggest benefits of having an in-car camera is that when you are reviewing the video, you can get the details correct for court. In all the studies of troopers using the dash cameras, a majority of them stated that written reports became allot more accurate after watching the dash cams videos.

In the next couple of years, the local sheriffs and police chiefs will be the decision-makers for how many cars will be outfitted with police cameras. The police administrators welcome the video cameras as the super tool able to exonerate their fellow officers from complaints and issues.

This is directed to the public in general. This notice may be of specific interest to persons who represent federal contracting officers, construction contractors and specifiers for federal agencies. It may also be of interest to the following entities including federal ( print page 11830) agencies setting specifications and/or requirements for federal construction ( e.g., GSA, FHWA, Department of Defense); manufacturers of lower embodied carbon construction materials; entities purchasing products covered by the Draft Label Program Approach for products used in federally funded construction projects; entities setting criteria for programs which provide funding for materials and products procured as part of transportation infrastructure and/or building construction projects ( e.g., FHWA); and architects, engineers, and other procurement-adjacent professionals and organizations aiming to use lower embodied carbon construction materials and products in their projects, rating systems, and construction planning tools.

This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The front-facing police car camera provides a benefit, that a body camera doesn't have. The impact strength is the point of view. The in-car video reveals the entire large scale point of view of an incident and the body-worn camera only shows a close-up officer point of view which is often chaotic. Often jurors cannot tell what is happening on the body camera video evidence because of the shaking like the (Blair witch movie). Most of the body-cameras footage is on the top of the heads of people and shoes since the officers come in all sizes and shapes, and there isn't a good way to mount a camera on an irregular human body, and that is the truth. Complications arising from bad body, police cameras. Well, it's a dirty secret, but I will reveal it to you here and now, the police body camera footage is horrible. You cannot get a clear view of an incident unless another officer shows up and stands 20 feet away so you can get a larger field overview, just like the in-car video camera.

EPA is interested in ensuring that GWP thresholds are based on sufficiently representative data, recognizing that what constitutes “representative” will vary by material. EPA plans to conduct proper statistical analysis on EPD availability, however, EPA is aware of the time constraints in doing so. EPA welcomes specific input on how to effectively define “representative” data for a specific material type when setting thresholds ( e.g., at least 30-50 EPDs for each material type in each region, or X% of all EPDs for a material type in each region).

As time moved along and the in-car camera system got smarter, the officers themselves began to admire how they looked in the videos as almost manifesting magically. The officers began to position like Hollywood directors, the interactions with suspects to get the best angles and recordings of the evidence on the scene. This was an organic development since most police officers got car cameras and no training on how to use a dash camera in a police vehicle.

The benefits by far outweigh the cost of having police car cameras. The citizens love, the greater accountability of the agency, and the police chief loves to clear false complaints against the officers at 90% or higher at the front line. The cameras are the most important tool the officer can have in the cars alongside their weapons. The features of the in-car video cameras are getting better as the years go on. We should focus on getting the most advanced police car cameras to every police agency or local law enforcement agency in our country.

police camsdash cam policepolice camera carvideo cameras in police carscop car cameraspolice grade dash campolice in car videopolice in car video systemspolice dash cam systempolice dashboard cameracamera police cardash camera policein car video systems for law enforcementpolice car video systemspolice dash camera systempolice dashboard cameraspolice in car cameraspolice recommended dash campolice video recorderdash cam for policein car camera policein car camera systems policein car video policelaw enforcement dash camera systempolice camera systempolice car video camera systempolice in car camera policypolice in car camera system

Breaking News Update: Police Car Camera Technology is Rapidly changing:The US police agencies have recently begun updating their patrol cruiser/vehicles with in-car camera HD technology, that will provide superior audio and 1080P video. A recorded account of the entire officers, traffic stops and other encounters with citizens involving patrol cars can save the lives and careers of the officer using the technology.

The in-car camera itself has recorded many officers being shot or killed at traffic stops. Most of the horrible cases are concluded with arrests and murder charges due to the video evidence recorded by the in-car camera systems being reviewed by investigations. The police vehicles in-car camera recorder is single-handedly responsible for more convictions than any tool the officer has at his disposal.

Since the late 1980s, there has been a push for police departments to use in-car-video cameras to record their traffic stops to document race encounters. After a while, the citizens grew to accept video recordings from the police cars as a necessary evil. Having a video recording of the traffic incident also gave the police chiefs the upper hand with the public and the confidence in their authority.

Choosing an item from full text search results will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box will also bring you to search results. Choosing an item from suggestions will bring you directly to the content.

The police departments searched for a way to give the public confidence in their agencies. Well, they all came to the same conclusion, the police in-car camera system was the solution. As soon as the police car cameras were injected into law enforcement agencies, there was a huge drop in accusations against the police. This was a shock to everyone, this was a huge upside, and the police chiefs started to accept them as basic equipment along with their sidearms.Camera technology has seen huge advancements since the late 1990s. The most advanced police dash-cam systems are now recording in 1080P or HD settings. This perfect quality video evidence has strengthened the police agencies standing with the communities. Now criminals and incidents are documented without the officer's intervention. The police car video cameras record, store, and WiFi upload, while ensuring the chain of evidence are secured.

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

To inform development of these documents and build upon input already received via the 2022 RFI, EPA welcomes additional input on ways to improve background data, enhance publicly available datasets in the LCA Data Commons, and facilitate PCR improvements.

In recent years, many research papers have been cited showing the reliance on in-car camera systems is the best investment a police department can make. The officers now have a different view of the car cameras. They used to feel that I was big brother watching them, but that paradigm has shifted to most officers won't go out on shift unless a camera is installed in the car due to safety issues. Officers who can watch their stops after a traffic incident on the monitor of the in-car video cameras felt it had a positive effect of making them a better officer. Most of these officers had concluded in the study that they saw mistakes, and what they could have done better when reviewing on the car-cameras monitor. The ability to communicate calmly and reassuringly way to citizens became normal as more and more video footage was reviewed from the dash cameras.

In the last decade or so there has been several studies from (IACP) or the international association of chiefs of police. Almost all of the studies come to one conclusion on the judgment of in-car camera systems. The studies are all positive, and the recommendations are that 100% of all police departments should be using police car cameras (Dash-Cams) at their agencies.

The in-car video system in the police vehicle features: Two HD 1080P cameras - one forward-facing windshield camera and one camera that records the rear suspect cage seating area of the patrol car; an HD DVR recorder and 2.4GHz officer wireless microphone transceiver which can also be used to activate the recording system from outside the police car. A special feature of the police dash-cam is a fantastic video and sound quality in extreme low-light situations.What can Police Car Cameras do with today's new tech?

The limitations of the police body camera are that most of the units can only be triggered to record manually. This means the officer has to reach down and hit the record button during an intense confrontation. If the cop forgets to hit record, then the incident or pursuit will not be documented. This will leave the police agency open to questions about why there is no video evidence.

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Police Car cameras have special features designed specifically for the police. The world of law enforcement has changed in the last 24 years. The camera technology has become very important to our society. Critical for law enforcement to keep pace with the changes. There are two main advancements in police car cameras. New high-tech squad cars are being equipped with new features like auto stop to keep the officers and citizens safe.

2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/​dockets/​commenting-epa-dockets.html.

Special Accommodations: To allow EPA time to process your request for special accommodations, please submit your request to EPA by 5 p.m. EST on February 16, 2024.

The critical use of dashboard police car cameras in police vehicles will become more prevalent in the next couple of years. Advancement in Artificial Intelligence in these systems is changing the way police do their job. We are the Authority for Police Car Cameras.

Additionally, EPA is interested in hearing from EPD verifiers and Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs) that would like to provide conformity assessment/verification services for this Draft Label Program Approach.

Kersey Manliclic, Data Gathering and Analysis Division (4410G), Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 566-9981; email address: manliclic.kersey@epa.gov.

We are obsessed with quality and ease of use. That's why we supply thousands of departments with ready to use solutions.  Free Demo Units Click Here.

1. Data quality improvements. EPA has begun work to implement Phase I of the label program, which includes:

Enter a search term or FR citation e.g. 88 FR 382 30 FR 7878 2024-13208 USDA 09/05/24 RULE 0503-AA39 SORN

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507. Learn more here.

Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.

12% of state police and highway patrol vehicles had a police car camera in 1999. Today a majority of 74% of state patrol cars have in-car video technology. Want to know more about what the video cameras in the car can do for the public and police? Let us start by saying that the police car cameras settle disputes arising from citizens being ticketed for speed violations.

"The in-car camera is the single most important weapon helping all of the American Police departments, giving reassurance to the citizens when they come into contact with our officers, there will be a digital audio and video recording, to make sure that the rights of each party are protected.

The last century saw huge lawsuits filed against all police agencies around our country. The main effect was racial profiling issues. These charges were leveled against local police agencies as well as state agencies. Why did the Police in-car video camera change everything, from recording to reporting, while an officer is on duty? The biggest change was, now every police department could show to the average citizens that the officer was conducting his business in a normal professional manner.

As the researchers and studies started to pour in on the benefits of in-car cameras, and how it made the law enforcement agencies accountable for their actions, the federal government offered to fund through the department of justice office of community-oriented policing services or (COPS). The government designed a program to make the purchasing and acquisition of in-car cameras more available to all police departments. The entire programs were made to purchase and install in-car camera systems. After many grant awards and more than 22 million dollars were spent acquiring in-car cameras.

Once the money was distributed and the purchases were made, the state police agencies now had a majority of their vehicles outfitted with police dash-cams. This COPS plan was a highly successful plan to equip a large portion of the police agencies with car cameras.

In almost every study, the common citizens were polled about the police car cameras and how they feel about being recorded during a traffic stop. An overwhelming majority of the public said that the police departments should be using and purchasing in-car camera systems. An even higher number said that all police cars should have dash cams in them installed and should be operational.

Preparing digital in-car video camera recordings of traffic incidents for the court has never been easier. The ability to Tag, Search, Retrieve video evidence has been greatly enhanced by digital video evidence management software programs. This type of video evidence management of the car to the courtroom has relieved some stress and manpower from the police departments and freed officers to get back on patrol in the vehicles. Probable cause searches of suspect cars are now easily documented by dash-cams and easily traceable to the actual time and date of the occurrence, so writing reports become very accurate.

As wireless technology increases, it may become a reality that real-time video could be transmitted from the police cars to a law enforcement agency in real-time. This car camera to a central collection station could help our security departments hunt down wanted dangerous suspects.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the availability of and seeking public comment on a document that describes its draft approach for implementation of the EPA label program for low embodied carbon construction materials (Draft Label Program Approach), and is announcing a webinar on February 27, 2024. The Inflation Reduction Act authorized $100 million to EPA to develop a program to identify and label construction materials and products that have substantially lower embodied carbon, in coordination with the General Services Administration (GSA) and the Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

2. Material threshold setting. EPA is considering several options for addressing regional differences specific to the sourcing of materials and products in the Global Warming Potential (GWP) threshold setting process as part of Phase II of the Draft Label Program Approach. EPA welcomes specific input on what methods would be effective, feasible, and time- and cost-effective for specifying regions where necessary ( e.g., AASHTO Climate Zones, groupings of states, market share or geological breakdowns).

EPA is seeking public input on specific aspects of the Draft Label Program Approach. The following information and topics may help inform stakeholder input on data quality improvements, material threshold settings, certification and labeling, and the overall program approach.

4. Overall approach. EPA recognizes the importance of transparency and stakeholder input as we continue to develop this program. Other feedback is welcome in the form of questions, comments or additional information for consideration as we move forward.

FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This information is not part of the official Federal Register document.

The Agency is requesting comment on the document titled “Draft Approach for Implementation of the EPA Label Program for Low Embodied Carbon Construction Materials” (Draft Label Program Approach), which is available in the docket. EPA is requesting information on a number of remaining questions that will help shape and refine the program. EPA is also announcing a stakeholder engagement opportunity through a webinar. During the webinar EPA will give a presentation on the Draft Label Program Approach and provide an opportunity for the public to provide comments.

The studies also showed that the officers saw themselves in a new light when reviewing the in-car video recordings. Most of them stated that they became aware of how they sounded and their demeanor and professionalism was improved. Officers most of the time receive a lot of training at the academy, but when they are put on traffic duty and have a camera in the car to record them it, makes a huge difference in how we judge ourselves. The extraordinary effect on officers being recorded by the in-car video cameras was that the officer was on his best behavior and so are the suspects when they are warned about being recorded.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The research shows that the results of having in-car cameras much improve the ability to clear up complaints. It's staggering, about 93% of the officer complaints are eliminated at the front desk once the citizens learn there was a dash camera recording their stop. What this means in conclusion, is that around 90% of the use-of-force complaints against officers are false accusations. How much time and money would be wasted investigating claims if the police car cameras didn't record these suspects trafficking stops. With a huge overwhelming clearing up of accusations of wrongdoing, only a small fraction of the camera caught force issues with the officers.

An important fact to inform the public about the in-car camera system, is that the recordings are locked from the officer and they cannot access them.  The police car cameras give officers extra insurance, ensuring that the story they say in court is the same as the video they recorded, backing their testimony. Come here to get the latest technology updates about police in-car camera technology in policing.

When it comes to police-cameras and how they affect policing policies, it can be measured in an objective, not the judgmental way. The studies are conclusive on these points: The most important benefit of the police in-car camera system was officer safety. The effects of having a video recording allowed a police chief or administrator to review an officer's performance in the field without physically overseeing his work. The second amazing beneficial outcome was the complaints or false accusations declined by the scope and number of incidents. As the community became aware of the police-dash-cams the citizens began to have greater confidence in their police department on a local scale. After some violent stressful crime videos, public opinion began to favor law enforcement again. The more the chiefs reviewed the in-car videos the better the officer training got.

A majority of the Police Chiefs and Sheriffs have seen the body-cameras as a way to cut costs, but that's dead wrong! The body-worn camera has a lower upfront cost but higher maintenance and storage cost. This will come as a shock in the next 12 months to most police agencies, but the sad truth is most of them won't be able to afford the hidden cost of the cameras. This might be a huge problem for body cameras in the future, as chiefs become discouraged from even starting using them. The other development is state laws have gone against the adoption of police cameras because of the costs. Some resourceful police chiefs have decided that more video is better, especially if there is a shooting or fight. Most of the departments and city councils are equipping the officers with in-car video systems and body cameras. Capturing critical evidence may save the department or state a huge amount of money on the back end of the case. Some prosecutors are now asking for the in-car video footage immediately with the video evidence management software right after the incident. Innovating in-car and police camera systems for law enforcement agencies will help everyone in the future, including citizens feeling more confident about the chain of evidence.

IRA Section 60116 authorized $100 million to EPA to develop a program to identify and label construction materials and products that have substantially lower embodied carbon, in coordination with the GSA and the FHWA.

EPA encourages all potentially interested parties, including individuals, governmental and non-governmental organizations, non-profit organizations, community-based organizations, labor organizations, academic institutions, research institutions, community health centers and clinics, public health administration and environmental health administration programs, and private sector entities to comment on the Draft Label Program Approach. To the extent possible, the Agency asks commenters to please cite any public data related to or that supports responses, and to the extent permissible, describe any supporting data that is not publicly available.

3. Certifying and labeling materials and products. EPA recognizes the need for credible conformity assessment to ensure stakeholder confidence in the Draft Label Program Approach. EPA welcomes specific input on what qualifications/accreditations should be considered (or required) of EPD verifiers to demonstrate sufficient knowledge and experience. EPA is interested in stakeholder feedback on whether the conformity criteria and processes used by EPA programs ( e.g., ENERGY STAR, WaterSense), recommended in the EPA Framework for the Assessment of Environmental Performance Standards and Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing, and/or those used for EPDs in the market today should be applied to this Draft Label Program Approach available at https://www.epa.gov/​greenerproducts/​framework-assessment-environmental-performance-standards-and-ecolabels-federal.

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI to EPA through email or https://www.regulations.gov. If you wish to include CBI in your comment, please follow the applicable instructions at https://www.epa.gov/​dockets/​commenting-epa-dockets#rules and clearly mark the information that you claim to be CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR parts 2 and 703, as applicable.

Battery life in a majority of police vehicles cameras is now incorporated into a car electrical system so that they do not have any limits on battery life. Police cameras in the car are constantly running and using the battery, updating their programs and capturing evidence continuously during situations. New police car cameras start recording as soon as the car is turned on, this is a reliable way to make sure the officer is recording every incident. Police car recordings are now the most valuable evidence for both citizens and law enforcement.

Agencies review all submissions and may choose to redact, or withhold, certain submissions (or portions thereof). Submitted comments may not be available to be read until the agency has approved them.

The video footage that the reliable, in-car police cameras provide is often so clear and precise that the jury gets an accurate picture of the incident without having to be physically there during the call. The police in-car video systems have to be rugged and reliable for 24 hours 365 days a year use.

Written comments: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2024-0038, through https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/​dockets.

An increasing number of U.S. federal, state, and local government procurement policies, as well as large institutional procurement policies, are aimed at driving down greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to construction materials. These policies often require manufacturers to disclose the embodied carbon of the materials and products they produce to be eligible for procurement. Embodied carbon refers to the amount of GHG emissions associated with the extraction, production, transport and manufacturing of materials and products.

The Draft Label Program Approach was developed by EPA in collaboration with stakeholders through a series of webinars announced in the Federal Register of January 26, 2023, titled “Stakeholder Engagement Opportunities on Inflation Reduction Act Programs To Reduce Embodied Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated With Construction Materials and Products” (88 FR 5002 (FRL-10439-01-OCSPP)). These webinars requested initial feedback on establishing new grant and technical assistance programs, and a carbon labeling program for construction materials with substantially lower levels of embodied greenhouse gas emissions. The Draft Label Program Approach has been informed greatly by the input received from the Request for Information (RFI) responses submitted, and by extensive collaboration with other federal agencies, including the GSA, FHWA, and others.

Martel In-Car Video camera grant list gives you eligible cameras and grants assistance opportunities supported by the Martel elite group.  The grants cover a wide range of digital video recorders, lidar-based systems, and other vehicle-mounted camera options. Google our in car video camera products and request free grant assistance today. We are here to help and we are nice people.

Registration: To receive the webcast meeting link and audio teleconference information before the meeting, you must register by 5 p.m. EST on February 26, 2024.

The top Manufacturers of in-car cameras (Police Dash-Cams Systems) such as Martel Electronics and others are developing forward-facing large view cameras that have more of a fishbowl lens, giving you close to 180 degrees camera views of the traffic stop. Given now the ability of the in-car cameras to record in 1080P HD, the larger lenses can now document over half of the car view without compromising the video evidence, just like panoramic iPhone photos. Most of the action that an in-car system records will be easily documented by a forward-facing camera.

This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents. This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links has no substantive legal effect.

Each agency must-have the leadership to make guidelines and have an in-car camera policy in place to meet the community's needs. If the policy is a good one everyone will agree when they are reviewing video from the controversial dash camera footage. There should be a guide on how the chain of evidence is protected, and why officers can't handle the information directly. The best in-car video camera systems use WiFi to transfer the video evidence from the car to the server via a wireless system.

They can do things that the body cam can never do without the officers touching the controls. The basic difference between the two videos capturing system is; one is a video game, shooter point of view of the camera body, versus the larger police car cameras larger viewpoint. Often the police in car system will record the entire incident, but the body cameras will often run out of space or battery during incidents.Recently many of top police chiefs related their research of the beneficial features of the in-car video cameras over the body-worn cameras for constant contact during police stops.

The community realizes that the research is in, and the police cameras are a huge success. The in-car cameras have come a long way in making policing a safer line of work. The car cameras have concreted themselves as a must have accessory in the car. The police cam is starting to redefine how an officer conducts his business during the day, and give an extra level of supervision that would not be cost-effective to have a supervisor in the field.

During the last couple of years, the HD police dash cam systems have made some critical technical advancements. Not only can the cameras record the evidence, but now the officers can add event tags such as DUI, Wanted Suspect, or even a custom call number that is associated with the situation. This allows departments to better organize thousands of videos from the police car cameras.The cost is now reasonable for every police agency to add video camera recorders to their fleet. The smallest departments now have more options for in-car cameras. Better dash car police video systems developed here in California help protect citizens in every state.

Webinar: Register online at https://www.zoomgov.com/​webinar/​register/​WN_​UK3t7WwXToiRNIYFlml7CA#/​ registration.

It's been over 20 years since a majority of law enforcement agencies have been using in-car video evidence capturing systems. The choice of whether to use body-cameras or in-car cameras has grown to epic proportions. Most of the police chiefs have concluded they will need both in-car and body units in the future. Both types of police cameras have benefits and cons. The body-worn police cameras are cheaper at first, but when the cost of replacements and storage are involved, the totals can quickly run 10X times the amount of the police patrol video cams. The cost savings quickly disappear as officers lose and destroy the body-worn cameras during their shifts. The administrators may be able to save money in the short run, but the body-camera is a money pit.This is the most honest assessment you will find on the web about the Capabilities/features of the in-car police video cameras and body-cameras.

Special Accommodations: Please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT .

True objective analyst of what happens during a crime scene situation can only be obtained from the dashboard police camera. These car cameras have technology that collects digital evidence protecting the officers and our people. Our courts benefit from the police car cameras because the cases are quickly settled.

Clearing Complaints at the Front Desk relieves stress on officers and is a huge benefit of having dashboard cameras. Studies have shown repeatedly that interviewing officers along with supervisors in the case where the in-car video is present, once the complainer was aware that there was a recording the issue was withdrawn. This cost savings to police departments is immense and cannot be calculated. Along with the mental aspects of officers being accused falsely is very damaging. All this can be eliminated by using police cameras. The police chief can give the in-car video recordings a cursory review and determine whether there's more need for an investigation into the complaint. Larger departments who use Internal Affairs have also agreed with the studies that there can't be a monetary amount on the beneficial aspects of having in-car cameras. Comprehensive in-car cameras policy procedures are key to making a successful car camera program. The conclusion is that the police car camera exonerates a huge majority of officers that get in trouble for force issues.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

The IRA, passed by Congress and signed into law in August 2022, leverages federal procurement and funding of buildings and infrastructure to catalyze markets for American-made construction materials and products with lower embodied carbon (also known as embodied greenhouse gas emissions). IRA Section 60116 provided EPA with $100 million dollars to develop and carry out a program to identify and label construction materials and products that have substantially lower levels of embodied greenhouse gas emissions associated with all relevant stages of production, use, and disposal, as compared to estimated industry averages of similar materials or products. EPA is committed to developing a label program that creates an easy and reliable way for purchasers to identify and procure such lower embodied carbon construction materials and products.

The training of an officer to use an in-car video system can be as important as the video itself. The course should have direct guidelines on when you activate and when not to record. The rules should be clear and concise to others in the field are not confused on when to record a suspect.

As soon as most of the violators or suspects see that the officer is directing them closer to the front of the police car's hood, most of them notice a flashing red record light. The normal response is "Am I being recorded officer," When the officer replies yes, you are being audio and video is recorded on my digital in-car video camera system, there is usually a calming reply said back to the officer. The effects of recordings of a police dash camera system of suspects, is usually a calm down of the situation, thereby making it easier for the police officer to do his job.

See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.