Moreover, our user-friendly video management software makes it easy to store, organize, and retrieve video evidence when needed. With secure cloud storage and advanced search capabilities, you can quickly access the footage you need.

•    increase transparency, public trust and confidence in the FPF  •    increase police officer accountability  •    augment, without replacing, current police officer note taking practices •    improve evidence collection and documentation •    provide additional evidence and early case resolution for prosecutions •    reduce use of force incidences by and against police officers by affecting the behaviour of        individuals who are aware of the recording in-progress •    improve assessment of alleged police misconduct  •    increase the efficiency of resolution of complaints against police  •    provide real-life training examples

•    Access to a body-worn camera video / image is automatically captured and tracked in the audit log, which includes the officer’s regimental number, time and date. Any member that views the video must write in the notes section on Evidence.com their reason for doing so.

Body-worn cameras were first deployed to 12 front-line Fredericton officers during a 2017 pilot.  As of June 28, 2023, all platoons are now equipped with body-worn cameras, which means a total 60 officers are now using the equipment.

The Fredericton Police Force recently deployed 48 additional body worn cameras to its front-line patrols. This initiative aims to improve overall community safety and well-being, increase transparency and accountability in policing and improve evidence collection and documentation.

Delivering industry-leading products, dedicated customer service and exceptional value, Pro-Vision is a trusted partner for thousands of organizations around the world.

o    the police officer whose BWC captured the recording; o    any other police officer who was present when the BWC recordings were made, with the permission of the police officer whose BWC captured the video.  o    a police officer who completes performance evaluations or has a supervisory role over the police officer that captured the BWC recording; o    a police officer who is responsible for evaluating a video’s potential benefit for training or to evaluate the effectiveness of approved use of force techniques; o    police officers in the chain of command senior to the police officer whose BWC captured the video when there is a legitimate investigative or administrative reason to view it; o    the Office of Professional Standards (FPF) in response to a complaint related to activity captured by the BWC recording;  o    any police officer who needs to view the BWC recording for law enforcement purposes, members of the DEMS Team, Crime Analyst or Court Prep staff for court disclosure and vetting; or o    lawyers acting on behalf of the FPF, a complainant, or insurance defense legal counsel may view recordings relevant to their case.

•    the officer whose body-worn camera captured the images;  •    any other officer who was present when the video / images were recorded, but only with the permission of the officer whose body-worn camera captured the video. The officer will only be given access to the portion of the video where they were present;  •    an officer who completes performance evaluations or has a supervisory role over the officer that captured the video;  •    an officer who is responsible for evaluating a video’s potential benefit for training or to evaluate the effectiveness of approved use of force techniques;  •    officers in the chain of command senior to the officer whose body-worn camera captured the video when there is a legitimate investigative or administrative reason to view it;  •    the Office of Professional Standards in response to a complaint related to the body-worn camera video / image; or  •    any officer who needs to view the video for law enforcement purposes.

Initially piloted in 2017, body-worn cameras were deployed to 12 front line officers. As of June 28, all platoons are now equipped with Body-worn cameras, bringing the total officers wearing Body-worn cameras to 60 members.

Body-worn cameras are only one of the tools available to law enforcement for improving community trust, transparency, and accountability. There are several benefits for law enforcement officers who wear body-worn cameras. (See above) body-worn cameras provide an additional layer of safety for the officer and those they interact with.

•    Buying the hardware and managing the data is was a consideration when making the investment for body-worn cameras. Overall, the costs vary depending on the type of camera, type of storage, IT support, and use of video.     •    Privacy considerations: Privacy rights of the public are a primary concern. Body-worn cameras have the potential to impinge on community members' expectation of privacy. The technology may also present concerns for vulnerable populations such as children and victims of crime.

•    a dwelling house;  •    anywhere that private health information and / or treatment is being received;  •    a law office;  •    a place of worship;  •    schools;  •    hospitals; or in situations such as:  •    where vulnerable individuals are present;  •    where children or youth are present, victims, or the subject of a criminal investigation;  •    where individuals are nude or have exposed private body areas; or  •    if a victim or witness is reluctant to cooperate when the body-worn camera is recording, or requests that police officers do not record in a sensitive situation.

The FPF has a policy to ensure that body-worn cameras are used properly in order that the Force may gain the maximum benefit from their operational use and that all staff who use the equipment or access the images are able to comply with the FPF requirements and legislation.

The distance at which a forward facing police car camera can effectively capture video depends on several factors, such as the camera’s resolution, lens quality, and environmental conditions. Generally, most modern police car cameras can provide clear footage from a distance of 20 to 30 feet, with some high-end models extending their range up to 100 feet or more. However, it’s essential to note that the clarity and detail of the video may diminish as the distance increases.

The FPF has a policy to ensure that body-worn cameras are used properly. The policy also dictates when they have to wear them and have them turned on and gives provisions as to when judgement and reasonable steps to mitigate the impact on the individual’s privacy should be taken into account.

Body-worn cameras have been in use by the Fredericton Police Force (FPF) since 2017. We equipped 12 officers with them as part of a pilot project.

•    The decision by a law enforcement agency to implement a body-worn camera program represents an significant investment of time and resources.

Officer body-worn cameras are relatively small devices that record interactions between community members (e.g., the public, suspects, and victims) and law enforcement officers. The video and audio recordings from body-worn cameras can be used by law enforcement to demonstrate transparency to their communities; to document statements, observations, behaviors, and other evidence; and to deter unprofessional, illegal, and inappropriate behaviors by both law enforcement and the public.

At Pro-Vision, we understand the unique challenges faced by law enforcement agencies and the importance of reliable, high-quality video evidence. Our state-of-the-art police car cameras and video management solutions are designed to meet the demanding needs of modern law enforcement.

Investing in high-quality police car cameras is crucial for law enforcement agencies. These cameras serve multiple purposes, including:

From our state-of-the-art video recording systems to real-time data monitoring and sophisticated cloud storage, Pro-Vision sets the industry standard in mobile video solutions.

Request a Demo to see how Pro-Vision’s video technology solutions can help your agency enhance safety, transparency, and efficiency.

Factors like lighting conditions, weather, and the speed of the vehicles involved can also impact the quality of the footage. Advanced patrol car camera systems, such as those offered by Pro-Vision, often feature wide-angle lenses and high-resolution sensors that can capture a broader field of view and more detail, even in challenging lighting conditions. This enhanced capability ensures that critical evidence is captured, regardless of the situation.

The duration for which video footage is stored varies depending on the agency’s policies and local regulations. Some agencies may keep footage for a few weeks, while others may store it for several months or even years. Factors like storage capacity, the nature of the incidents captured, and the policies of the state or agency also play a role in determining retention periods.

When it comes to law enforcement, having reliable and high-quality video evidence is crucial. Patrol car cameras, also known as in-car video systems or dash cams, play a vital role in capturing critical evidence and ensuring transparency. These cameras not only help agencies comply with evolving public demands for accountability but also provide valuable tools for officer training and performance evaluation. One common question that arises is, “How far can police car cameras see?” In this article, we’ll explore the capabilities of these cameras and how Pro-Vision’s video technology solutions can enhance law enforcement efforts.

Our cameras offer exceptional image quality, wide-angle views, and low-light performance, ensuring that you can capture clear and detailed footage in various situations. Our cameras provide valuable data that can help streamline investigations and improve overall efficiency.

The additional body-worn cameras represent an investment of $129,000 ($64,000 for the hardware, and $65,000 in licensing fees). Two additional administrative positions were created to support the Digital Evidence Management System, bringing the team to three positions.  Governance, use and storage of all recordings are in strict compliance with the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act and the New Brunswick Police Act. The Fredericton Police Force has worked extensively on its policies and procedures with the New Brunswick Ombud to ensure strict compliance with all privacy legislation.

If a recording becomes part of a case file and is evidence, it will follow the normal retention schedule as identified in Records and Reports policy (5.FPF.1.2).

Rear seat, side, and rear-facing cameras are occasionally used to provide a full 360 degree coverage in and around the patrol vehicle. Due to the dominance of SUVs over traditional sedans, high-center mounted side cameras will only see anywhere from 20-40 feet from the vehicle as they are pointed downward to ensure any critical incidents occurring next to the vehicle are captured.

Additionally, the FPF’s Digital Evidence Management Team is responsible for vetting and redacting (audio and visual) private information of victims, witnesses, and other members of the public for evidence that goes to court or that is being released through RTIPPA.

Body-worn cameras have been in use by the Fredericton Police Force (FPF) since 2017, and their use and FPF’s policies and procedures with respect to this use of body-worn cameras has been reviewed by the New Brunswick Ombud,  Access to Information and Privacy Division.  Police officers will weigh the law enforcement objective against privacy concerns and take reasonable steps to mitigate the impact on the individual’s privacy.

Police car cameras are typically mounted on the dashboard or windshield of the patrol vehicle – there are also side and rear-facing camera options. They are connected to a digital video recorder (DVR) that stores the footage. The cameras are automatically activated when the officer turns on the emergency lights or manually triggered by the officer when needed.

From commercial fleets and the school transportation industry, to transit fleets and law enforcement, Pro-Vision has the experience and expertise to meet your safety needs.

In addition to the clear direction which has been provided to officers through their body-worn camera training and the existing policies prohibiting misuse, the Fredericton Police Force has worked extensively on its procedures and policies with the New Brunswick Ombud and is in strict compliance with the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, as well as the Police Act.

It depends, some patrol car cameras are not always recording and others are. Some are usually set up to start recording when the officer activates the emergency lights or manually turns on the camera. This helps conserve storage space and ensures that only relevant footage is captured. However, many cameras record from ignition until vehicle turnoff.

The use of a body-worn camera can have significant privacy implications in any circumstance, but some situations and locations carry heightened privacy concerns, for example:

Recordings that have not been flagged as relevant to an investigation or possible legal action, by the Digital Evidence Management Team (DEMS), will be automatically deleted from the server after thirty (30) days from the date the recording was filed.

The FPF has been using body-worn cameras since 2017, and has had great success with them, as have Forces across the country and around the world. The use of body-worn cameras and using digital evidence in policing increases transparency, public trust and confidence in the Force, increases police officer accountability and improves evidence collection and documentation, among some of the ways we measure their effectiveness.

Yes, most modern police car cameras are equipped with microphones that can record audio along with the video footage. This feature is particularly useful for capturing conversations between officers and the public during traffic stops or other interactions. It can also be particularly important with the rear-seat cameras where an arrested individual may reveal incriminating testimony while en route to jail.

The purpose of using body-worn cameras is to support FPF officers in the execution of their policing duties while balancing privacy rights of individuals. The main goals of using body-worn cameras are as follows:

We work closely with our service provider, AXON, who have security measures in place, along with our secure network.   https://www.axon.com/news/security-matters-how-we-keep-your-data-secure…;

Body-worn camera use is not prohibited in these circumstances and deactivation of the body-worn cameras is not recommended given the important purposes served using the body-worn cameras.