Police body cameras (also called body-worn cameras) are small cameras worn on a law enforcement officer’s chest or head to record interactions between the officer and the public. The cameras have a microphone to capture sound and internal data storage to save video footage for later review. [37][41]

On June 7, 2021, U.S. Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, directed the ATF, DEA, FBI, and U.S. Marshals “to develop and submit for review” body-worn camera policies in which agents wear cameras during “(1) a pre-planned attempt to serve an arrest warrant or other pre-planned arrest, including the apprehension of fugitives sought on state and local warrants; or (2) the execution of a search or seizure warrant or order.” [63]

Video recorded from police body cameras can be used to train new and existing officers in how to perform during difficult encounters with the public. The Miami Police Department has been using body cameras for training since 2012. Former police major Ian Moffitt states, “We can record a situation, a scenario in training, and then go back and look at it and show the student, the recruit, the officer what they did good, what they did bad, and [what they can] improve on.” [17]

After the police shooting death of Michael Brown on Aug. 9, 2014, in Ferguson, Missouri, President Barack Obama requested $263 million to fund body camera programs and police training on Dec. 1, 2014. As a result the Department of Justice (DOJ)  implemented the Body-Worn Camera Policy and Implementation Program (BWC-PIP). Between fiscal year (FY) 2015 and FY 2019, the BWC-PIP gave over 493 awards worth over a collective $70 million to law enforcement agencies in 47 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Agencies in Maine, Montana, and North Dakota have not been awarded federal body camera funding. [38][40][42][43][44][46]

Other potential health and safety issues include head and neck injuries, electric shock or burns from faulty or damaged equipment, and the spread of contagious infectious diseases if the units are shared. [20]

Since our founding in 2006, the PhaZZer Brand has earned a reputation as one of the nation’s most dependable manufacturers of less-lethal weapons for the law enforcement and civilian sectors. We go the extra mile to ensure that our weapons comply with the highest standards of safety and reliability. We’re proud to say that our Law Enforcement Grade CEWs and other personal protection products have been linked to ZERO deaths on record as of this writing.

Assaults on police officers were 14% higher when body cameras were present. Some people may respond negatively or violently to being filmed by police, especially those who may be under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or who are suffering from mental health problems. [18]

Equipping police departments with body cameras is extremely expensive, as forces have to budget not only for the camera but also for ancillary equipment (such as a car charger or mount), training, data storage facilities, extra staff to manage the video data, and maintenance costs. Baltimore Police entered a body-worn camera program in 2016 for $11.3 million. As of June 25, 2020, the costs had tripled to $35.1 million. [26][59]

As of Oct. 29, 2018, 36 states and the District of Columbia had specific legislation about the use of police body cameras. At that time, another four states had pending body camera legislation. However, by July 14, 2022, the most recently available survey, all but six states had body camera specific legislation: Alabama, Alaska, Maine, Mississippi, Rhode Island, and West Virginia. [45][64]

Amid the Black Lives Matter protests after the death of George Floyd, a June 2020 Reuters/Ipsos poll found 92% of Americans wanted federal police officers to wear body cams. A July 2020 University of Maryland School of Public Policy survey found 90% support for all police officers being required to wear body cameras, including 85% of Republicans, 86% of independents, and 94% of Democrats. [54][55]

If you’re looking for a dependable law enforcement CEW like the ones police officers use in the field, you need to become acquainted with PhaZZer’s options of self-defense products. We invite you to take a closer look at our Law Enforcement grade CEWs.

Police body cameras are in use around the world from Australia and Uruguay to the United Kingdom and South Africa. [19][32][35][36]

One such barrier is fear of retaliation. A U.S. Justice Department report notes that some “people will be less likely to come forward to share information if they know their conversation is going to be recorded, particularly in high-crime neighborhoods where residents might be subject to retaliation if they are seen as cooperating with police.” [23]

In Phoenix, Arizona, complaints against officers wearing cameras decreased 23%, while complaints against officers not wearing cameras increased 10.6%. [13]

PhaZZer is proud to offer these high-quality, Police Grade CEWs as part of our catalog of less-lethal self-defense weapons. Our CEWs are well suited for individuals working for police departments / law enforcement agencies, Private Security, and civilians for less lethal self-defense.

A sheriff’s office in Virginia stopped using body cameras due to the unreliability of their on-off buttons and poor integration with their IT systems that resulted in the system inaccurately matching camera footage to the officer wearing the camera. [31]

University of Oklahoma professor of law Stephen E. Henderson states that the use of police body cameras may be psychologically damaging to officers because “nobody does well to be under constant surveillance.” [21]

Officers in the United Kingdom and Queensland, Australia echoed this benefit, stating some abusers plead guilty because they knew there was video footage evidence against them. [52][53]

When an officer wearing a camera arrives at a domestic violence scene, the camera is able to record the immediate aftermath of the attack, including injuries the victim has suffered, as well as victim statements that may be more honest than later statements once victims remember emotional and financial ties to their abusers. Victims may also feel more secure in their testimony with video evidence backing up their statements. [51][52]

The cameras also protect police officers against false accusations of misconduct. In San Diego, California, the use of body cameras provided the necessary evidence to exonerate police officers falsely accused of misconduct. The number of severe misconduct allegations deemed false increased 2.4% with body camera footage, and the number of officers exonerated for less severe allegations related to conduct, courtesy, procedure, and service increased 6.5%. [11]

Disclaimer: This website and our merchandise is not endorsed, sponsored by or affiliated in any way with PhaZZer Electronics Inc. PhaZZer LLC is a sublicensee of the PhaZZer®️ brand intellectual property. Phaser®️ is a registered trademark of CBS Studios Inc. This website and our merchandise is not endorsed, sponsored by or affiliated with CBS Studios or the STAR TREK franchise. TASER®️ is a registered trademark of Axon Enterprise, Inc. Any information mentioned on this website is for reference purposes only and not sponsored by or affiliated with the TASER®️ brand. All videos used on this website are believed to be public domain and are for informational purposes only. The products demonstrated in these videos may differ from the products offered herein. By using this website and/or ordering on it you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

In Baltimore, Maryland, an officer was convicted of fabricating evidence and misconduct in office after being caught by body-worn cameras planting fake drug evidence. [14][49]

Police body worn cameras offer transparency and accountability to the public, which is an attempt to “mend that frayed relationship between the police and the community,” according to former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. [56][57][58]

In general, conducted energy devices (CEDs) like police stun guns and taser devices have been proven to be extremely effective, reliable, and safe personal protection devices. A study published by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) found that “The potential for moderate or severe injury related to CED exposure is low. Based on published studies, significant injury has been noted in less than 0.5 percent of those experiencing a CED exposure and has been estimated not to exceed 0.7 percent” (Study of Deaths Following Electro Muscular Disruption, May 2011).

Former chief of police Ken Miller of Greensboro, North Carolina, says that if citizens “think that they are going to be recorded every time they talk to an officer, regardless of the context, it is going to damage openness and create barriers to important relationships.” [23]

Pat Lynch, president of the Police Benevolent Association of the city of New York, state officers “are already weighed down with equipment like escape hoods [gas masks], Mace, flashlights, memo books, ASPs [batons], radio, handcuffs and the like. Additional equipment becomes an encumbrance and a safety issue for those carrying it.” [17]

In a perhaps extreme but cautionary example, in Oct. 2018 a Staten Island, New York, officer’s body camera burst into flames while the officer was wearing the device. He was luckily not injured, but the department was forced to recall thousands of cameras. [61]

Elliott Knetsch, prosecutor for the city of Burnsville, Minnesota, whose police department uses body-worn cameras, states, “When the cops are called and come through the door, the victim is very happy and relieved to see them. They feel safe. They tell the officer what happened. That statement given right at that moment is more likely to be the truth than what comes out even half an hour later, when the implications of what has happened start to set in.” [51]

According to the Bureau of Justice Assistance, “[t]he video and audio recordings from BWCs [body-worn cameras] can be used by law enforcement to demonstrate transparency to their communities; to document statements, observations, behaviors, and other evidence; and to deter unprofessional, illegal, and inappropriate behaviors by both law enforcement and the public.” [41]

Many police departments, especially smaller departments with smaller budgets, have suspended body-worn camera programs citing rising costs of the cameras, maintenance of the programs, employees, and data storage. [27][28][29][30][60]

PhaZZer has taken the additional precaution of drawing design guidance from the safety standards of various government agencies and first responders, including the DOJ, the American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM), the American Heart Association (AHA), Department of Corrections (DOC), and various other medical studies related to preventing death or serious injury by overexposure.

PhaZZer® Enforcer basic sets and packages give you plenty of options when it comes to self-defense. The PhaZZer® Enforcer is a less-lethal Conducted Energy Weapon (CEW) that has been designed to deliver as much take-down power as any Electronic Control Device (ECD) available today.

A trial in Edmonton, California, found that body-worn cameras had an insufficient battery length for daily policing, especially in cold weather when battery life diminished more quickly. [9]

Protected by an ABS high-impact polymer plastic housing, the PhaZZer FORCE™ also delivers plenty of power, with a peak open voltage of 55,000 V, .21 mA at 23 pulses per second (pps). It also has a lithium ion in-weapon rechargeable battery  that ensures long-lasting reliability.

The PhaZZer FORCE™ was specifically created at the request of the Department of Corrections for use by guards in detention facilities. It is outfitted with a 4 ½-foot retractable circuit disconnect ripcord that deactivates the weapon in the event that the user loses control of it. Its patented Safety Shut Down Circuit Technology™ also prevents needless injury by automatically disabling the system after three consecutive five-second discharges have been fired from the gun.

In the six months since body cameras were deployed in Burnsville, police recorded video for almost every domestic violence case, something former chief deputy of the Dakota County Attorney’s Office, Phil Prokopowicz, finds useful. He states that camera footage “can be influential in resolving the case in terms of negotiations. The defendant gets to see the act and know what will be displayed in front of the jury. The documenting of those first moments is very critical to those types of cases, as well as any admissions that may occur as officers are entering.” [51]

Recording police encounters with the public could lead to the public exposure of private medical conditions such as mental illness. Victims of crimes such as rape or domestic abuse may be further traumatized by recordings. Informants or witnesses may fear reprisal from criminals. People being arrested may fear the damage of public exposure, such as being fired from a job. [17][19][34]

Another privacy fear, according to the ACLU, is that police body cameras will be worn as “roving surveillance devices that track our faces, voices, and even the unique way we walk” that could be used “to track, classify, and discriminate against people based on their most personal, innate features.” [62]

Please click the links provided here to learn more about our police grade CEWs, and don’t hesitate to contact us for more information.

Police body cameras provide visual and audio evidence that can independently verify events. In Texas, a police officer was fired, charged with murder, and sentenced to a $10,000 fine and 15 years in prison after body-worn camera footage contradicted his initial statement in the Apr. 2017 shooting of an unarmed youth. [12][48]

A RAND study found that use of force by police officers dropped if the officers wearing cameras kept the cameras recording for the officers’ whole shift. In Miami-Dade County, Florida, researchers found a 19% reduction in police officers using physical force against citizen resistance, and civil cases against the police department for use of force dropped 74%. [50][47]

Former Spokane, Washington police chief Frank Straub notes that “every day we are exposing persons challenged by mental illness, autism, developmental disabilities, addiction, etc. We are creating and making public recordings of their illness and potentially creating life-long consequences.” [22]

Like the PhaZZer FORCE™, it comes with ABS high-impact polymer plastic housing and our patented Safety Shut Down Circuit Technology™, among other useful features. Feel free to explore our various sets and packages for the accessories and options that suit you best.