There has been some debate on the matter of whether or not law enforcement officials should wear body cameras or not. Law enforcement officers should wear body-worn cameras because it will help the officers while on patrol and the offender while being arrested or stopped. This topic has been debated for a long period of time. It really came to light when Michael Brown, an 18 year old african american boy, was shot and killed in August of 2014 by Officer Wilson, in Ferguson, Missouri.

LEDWand light

The body camera has become a popular choice amongst police departments worldwide. The situation of the scenario, and if the officer or suspect acted in the right can be determined from past footage. The cause of the body camera has been the allegations against officers for how they acted in certain situations, as well as for how the suspect acted during the callout. The effect has been officers being terminated due to lack of integrity or situational awareness, as well as officer safety. Suspects have also been convicted of false accusations against a police officer, as well as crimes presented in court, from fights, to officer involved shootings. The body worn camera has benefited both police officers and the general public.

Cops everywhere are being looked on with hate and disgust. People are feeling threatened by cops even though they are doing their job to protect us and keep our cities safe. Body cameras are an ever growing topic between many parties, but have they looked at it from all sides? Not everyone was there to witness and judge the situation, but the stories are compelling. With cameras we get what happened in audio/visual proof. They can save jobs and give people the proof needed. However cops deserve their privacy. Body cameras should be on cops, but they should be allowed to turn them on or off as they wish.

Others are questioning if we should actually be putting our police officers under such a massive microscope. Retorting phrases such as, how are they going to do their jobs with people over their shoulders? Body cams have been distributed to some police departments in different many different counties and states, but they are not mandatory. I believe officers should wear body cams, for the sake of the accused and the officer. People propose body cams as a solution to the problem.

LEDLight Wandphotography

The camera is constantly rolling and according to CNN “both officers and civilians acted in a more positive manner when they were aware that a camera was present”(Department of justice). In addition to if any false accusations are made against a police or civilian; justice can easily be served. With the tensions being as high as they are right now I personally am afraid of police. According to CNN so are more than 150,000 americans that signed the white house’s petition; that all police are required to wear a camera. Body Cameras are the first step we need to take to rebuild trust with police and

Did you ever think how life would be if police officers had body cameras?. Do you think all this would have happened if these unarmed African Americans weren’t shot?. Ever since these unarmed African Americans were shot, this country has been getting out of hand, now there's rioting on the streets people are breaking into stores stealing things. Things are getting out of hand so much violence they had to bring the national guard to come protect us. Thank god things died down violence was stopped on the streets because they saw that it was not going no where, so they started actually peaceful protesting which we were trying to do but things got out of hand.

SafetyLight Wand

Wand LightHarry Potter

Today, law enforcement agencies, or more specifically police officers, are under constant scrutiny from their peers as well as outside sources. Many of these problems arise from how the police treat and deal with these citizens. There is however a solution to these problems, which can not only improve officer safety, but can also protect anyone else that the officer encounters. The solution to this problem is officer mounted camera systems, or better known as body cameras. These body cameras capture almost everything an officer see’s as well as hears. This allows for protection against a police officer as well as protection for a citizen who was scrutinized for something he or she might have done or not. Body cameras are ever increasing in policing and have many benefit’s as well as draw backs.

Some feel that is not necessary for police to wear cameras because self-defense does not need to be justified. The assumption is that police officers are doing their job in an honest and fair way is enough for some. It does need to be taken into consideration that the ideal police officers are serving for the public and that their intentions

I do agree that police officers should wear body cameras to prevent violence and protect any false accusations, misconduct, or abuse against the officers. For an example an officer using excessive force on a civilian, that doesn’t have a weapon on them can cause a major issue in our society. In addition it will also help the civilians to be able to trust the law enforcement officers. While the camera is rolling the civilians and the police officers can act accordantly. Even though many people believe that police officers wearing body cameras will cause problems with privacy, but in the long run this will make a difference on how we as a society handle certain situations.

LEDWand LightRechargeable

Within recent years there has been much controversy surrounding police officers and whether or not they should be wearing body cameras to document their everyday interactions with the public. While the use of body cameras may seem to invade the public or police privacy. Police-worn body cameras will be beneficial to law enforcement and civilians all over the world. Police must be equipped with body cameras to alleviate any doubt in the effectiveness of officers. Law enforcement worn body cameras would enhance the trust of the public by keeping both the officers and the citizens accountable for their actions, providing evidence, and helping protect them from false accusations, while protecting privacy

First and foremost the introduction of the use police body worn cameras in the Law enforcement is laudable. But the use of these police worn body cameras has its pros and cons. I have confidence in the use of body worn camera, but it should be tested before it becomes compulsory for all Law enforcement personnel. The use of this system will bring transparency within the law enforcement agency, but I believe it will bring more harm than good. I’m not against or for the motion with the use of body worn cameras because the advantages and disadvantages are pretty even. I do believe body worn cameras should be used whenever appropriate. Officers should be allowed to turn them on and off at the public and their own discretion. It is not fair nor

Police officers should wear body cameras at all times on duty because it creates more evidence. Body cameras document everything from witnesses,victims,and suspects. “Perceived benefits that body-worn cameras offer—capturing a video recording of critical incidents and encounters with the public, strengthening police accountability, and providing a valuable new type of evidence—largely outweigh the potential drawbacks. (Ziv). This supports the argument because body cameras will be able to record any incidents and report them with the public. This quote support my big argument because only the officers and the victims knows what going on in a situation. This quote supports the position because now there will be clear evidence in certain

LEDlight wandfor face

Since the death of Michael brown; an unarmed teenager who was fatally shot by a Police Officer. Tensions between Officers and Civilians ascended; the story that the officer made did not make sense to some. There was no hardcore proof of what led up to the death of Michael Brown. Which influenced the grand jury to not indict Officer Darren Wilson under the fact of “provably wrong , inconsistent statements given by witnesses” (IBTimes, Varandani). Bad Police Officers have been getting away with murder for years. They know how to cover up evidence and they know how to make up stories. Both in which is enough to keep them out of jail because lack of cold hard evidence. Which leads to the debate if Police officers should wear body cameras. Even though Many will argue that body cameras are too expensive and may make people uncomfortable. I believe that Police need to wear them. Because with actual video footage taken by the body camera it can be tremendous help in serving justice. …show more content…

Are you confident that the body camera is keeping both sides honest? Cameras can only show what the camera holder wants us to see. However, on some levels, I think the cameras on the officers can become beneficial because as the public a little more can become seen than just hearing the cops word. William, I worry about the body cameras, when activated because " the cameras can also capture moments after a stressful incident where statements by the officers and the public can be taken out of context and used against the person making the statements." The cameras becoming used as away to cause harm or used out of context is why I am very undecided whether the cameras are the best idea. I am glad that I am not the only one that thought

As of now in the United States the main issues that continue to arise is excessive force and violating peoples Fourth Amendment rights. It is apparent the hot topic for this discussion is going to be the body cameras. I have to wear a body camera on patrol. Per our policy, anytime we have an interaction with the general public our body camera will be on during the duration of the interaction. Before I left corrections to come to patrol there were no body cameras in corrections. Now our correction officers must wear them as well. So not only are the patrol man affected by changes, but our corrections side is as well.

A developing number of state and province authoritative offices over the United States have been debating the advantages and disadvantages to police body cameras and whether they ought to end up a portion of the standard law implementation officer's uniform. Earlier police divisions were using cameras before the big change. Rialto, California police department has been wearing body-mounted cameras that record everything that happens in the middle of cops and civilians. Police officers have gotten above the law and are now able to abuse their powers as they wish, this truth is to be extremely terrifying. Especially being an African American male in today’s society and see these acts of deadly force being posted on social media affects me every

Extreme Glow North America Corporation is a privately-owned United States company chartered in the state of Mississippi. Our specialty is marketing glow-in-the-dark and chemical glow products at reasonable prices to the world on the internet... Read More

In the past couple years the media has been focusing a lot of its attention on police officers. Sadly they make police officers out to be horrible people who act solely on their hatred for certain races, but in reality police officers are there for the safety of the citizens. In any profession there will be people who are there for the wrong reasons, and this is true for police officers as well. Although most police officers focus on the safety and wellbeing of the citizens, some police officers are in for their own selfish and personal reasons. As a result they act immoral and unethical. These are what the media calls bad cops. Because of the misconduct of a few police officers, the public now proposes police officers wear body cameras. The use of body cameras proves to be a valuable asset in the incrimination of justice because of its many benefits, few downsides, and overall public approval.