Powder Coating vs. Anodizing for Aluminium - aluminium coating

 2024-09-04 03:19:38

Fatkhiev, D. M. et al. Recent advances in generation and detection of orbital angular momentum optical beams-a review. Sensors 21, e50028 (2021).

It’s easy enough to test for yourself with a camera and waveform monitor. You can even see this with most cameras with a histogram. Use negative agin and you’ll see the peak recording level drop and some shadow detail become clipped. Add gain and you’ll see the noise floor come up and highlights clip earlier.

Milanizadeh, M. et al. Separating arbitrary free-space beams with an integrated photonic processor. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 197 (2022).

Alternatively, external power monitoring could be achieved by packaging a fiber array onto the output grating couplers and measuring the transmitted intensities with photodiodes. To realize an all-integrated version of the utilized system, power monitoring could also be fully integrated on-chip by using built-in photodiodes. Grating couplers in the monitoring interface would no longer be required. The integrated processor we utilize here even has built-in in-line power monitors35, which can be seen in Fig. 1a on the right, between the central light processing unit and the grating couplers in the monitoring interface. However, these were not used for the presented experiments in order to reduce the systems’ complexity.

Digital converter (AD) wich converts black (0 volts) to byte values centered on 16 (16 is black and “centered on” because there is

Pai, S. et al. Experimentally realized in situ backpropagation for deep learning in photonic neural networks. Science 380, 398–404 (2023).

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

When you add gain the reverse happens. Generally how far the sensor can see into the shadows is limited by the sensors noise floor. Add 6db of gain and you will make the darkest parts of the image brighter by 6db, but you will also raise the noise level by the same amount. So while you do end up with brighter shadow details you can’t actually see any more picture information because the noise level has increased by the same amount. At the top end as the brightest sensor output is mapped to the maximum recording level at 0db, when you add gain this pushes the recording level beyond what can be recorded, so you loose 6db off the top end of your recordings because the recordings and output clips 6db earlier. So positive gain maintains the same shadow range but reduces the highlight recording range by 6db. However you use it gain tends to reduce your dynamic range. Adding gain to cope with poor lighting tends to be the lesser of the two evils as generally if your struggling for light then overexposure and blown out highlights is often the last of your worries. Negative gain is sometimes used in camera to try to reduce noise, but the reality is that you are loosing dynamic range. Really a better solution would be to expose just a tiny bit brighter and then bring your levels down a bit in post production. Please Share If You Found This Useful. Sharing Helps Keep This Site Running And Encourages Me To write More!Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading... Related

0,847418 volts. At the same time, the gain of the analog amplifier is reduced by the same proportion. Now black 0 volt is always

Imagine you have a glass of water that is full to the brim. You then place an object in the bottom of the glass to boost the level and the water level rises and you lose some water out of the top of the glass.

saturated at 1 volt (the input stage of the analog amplifier can also be saturated). Your highlights are thus clipped, the camera

The part of a microscope, or telescope, that you look through to see the magnification. This part of the instrument meanwhile gets closer to your eye.

signal is clipped. On a black image, this sensor delivers ~0 volts (~ because there is noise). The following stage is an Analog to

Rod Lenses We manufacture Rod Lenses, ranging in diameter from 0.80mm to 25mm ... Rod Lenses. Glass Rods. rod lens. We manufacture Rod Lenses, ranging in ...

can be encoded in full range YUV have noting to see with the 65536 levels that can be encoded in RGB because the encoding math is

How long is a piece of string? ISO is not exposure, ISO is gain and brightness, how much you can raise the gain depends on how much noise you are prepared to accept.

Light source or beam whose rays are parallel. Lasers generate collimated light beams, and lenses can be used to collimate light. « Back to Glossary Index.

shutter speed/aperture ratio because this changes the max saturation voltage of the sensor. On the other hand, at high gain values,

bit example), then there is no color and the resulting RGB is 255,255,255. Now, if Y=255 and Cb and/or Cr are not 128, then you have

depth of a 8 bit camcoder shooting in HDR (grather bit depth to reduce the banding artifacts) but the clip nust then be converted to

Mair, A., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature 412, 313–316 (2001).

0,847418 volts. At the same time, the gain of the analog amplifier is reduced by the same proportion. Now black 0 volt is always

The reconfigurable photonic integrated circuit was fabricated commercially and is based on a 220 nm silicon-on-insulator platform. All waveguides in the photonic circuit are single-mode channel waveguides and have a width of 500 nm. Standard grating couplers, originally designed for fiber-coupling, where used to interface the photonic chip with free-space light. In total, they are ~16 μm wide by 40 μm long, have a grating pitch of 630 nm, and couple linearly polarized light (polarized along the direction of the grating grooves) to the transverse electric mode of the attached waveguides. They are designed for operation at 1550 nm, at which they emit light at an angle of ~12∘ to the surface normal of the chip. The free-space interface consists of 16 grating couplers, arranged along two concentric rings of 200 μm and 225 μm radii, with couplers oriented such that they are locally rotated by ± 45∘ with respect to the tangent line. Within the light processing unit, each on-chip interferometer is composed of two directional couplers (50:50 beam splitters), each with a length of 40 μm and a waveguide spacing of 300 nm. To reconfigure each interferometer, two TiN heaters (each 2 μm wide and 80 μm long) are placed above the waveguides, shifting the phase based on the thermo-optical effect. Thermal crosstalk is minimized by the implementation of thermal trenches which separate the TiN heaters from other waveguides in their close vicinity.

Morichetti, F. et al. Non-invasive on-chip light observation by contactless waveguide conductivity monitoring. IEEE J. Select. Topics Quant. Electron. 20, 292–301 (2014).

lift) to clip voltages that are under a certain level. The noise is less visible but the gamma of the shadows is now distorded.

Next, with this information known, unknown input amplitudes and phases (i) can be subsequently sent onto the free-space interface. Recording and matching a set of transmitted intensities now reveals these input amplitude and phases at the grating coupler positions.

Most sensors only have 2 or 3 carefully set analog gain levels. Most gain changes in a video camera are applied after the sensors A to D with just 1 or 2 coarser gain range changes prior to the A to D. Negative gain is almost always applied after the A to D and this is why the blacks end up clipped.

Dec 21, 2021 — A deep DoF means all or most of your photo will be in focus, including the foreground, subject and background. ... The longer or more zoomed in ...

Communications Physics thanks Vijay Kumar, Sha Zhu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Assuming I’ve calibrated my zebras correctly to the right gamma / paint settings with the intention of using them to expose on bright whites, is it safe to say I’ll often need to bump up my ISO / db settings until a seemingly “bright white” is covered in stripes? Essentially, with video, I’m always reluctant to change out of the native ISO of a camera at the expense of dynamic range. However, I’m unaware of what else to change given lower-light conditions. I don’t want to alter shutter speed, obviously, and if my lens is already as open as possible – how else can I get the right exposure?

is in EDIUS wich clips nothing or in Resolve with all the data levels set to FULL. It’s also usefull to increase the very low bit

above 1023 in the Resolve RGB parade/histogram/Wave Form. This is a conversion to RGB assuming that my YUV is 16-255 for Y, but if I

Gainto ISO conversion

work without an issue, the sensor must be capable of delivering 0.6 x 1.9952 volts = 1.19721 volts but in my example, he is

noise). Assume also that the 0.6 volts sensor signal is converted to the byte value 255. Then, the 0.6 to 1 volt range is the room

After the light processing unit all waveguides are terminated by, again, grating couplers, in this case arranged along a line, spaced 127 μm apart. Imaging these on a conventional camera enables external power monitoring. The intensity of each grating coupler in the recorded image is directly proportional to the intensity of the on-chip waveguide mode. The imaging system is carefully designed with a combination of two 1-inch lenses of 100 mm focal length. These ensure a high imaging quality with low aberrations while still gathering all light emitted from the grating couplers. The use of a D-shaped pick-off mirror additionally improves the imaging quality. It blocks parts other than the free-space interface from being illuminated. Also, it prevents reflections from the photonic chip to hit the camera. Minor differences in the optical coupling at the different output gratings are not taken into account at this stage.

The 8 (10) bit values of the luminance signal (Y) is 16-235 (64-959) if you shoot at 100 IRE and 16-255 (64-1023) if you shoot at

Regarding the speed of this approach to operation, at the present stage with no focus on this aspect each full measurement of relative input amplitude and phase takes ~2 min. However, the photonic processor can operate and adjust its individual configuration states at tens to hundreds of microseconds, before it is limited by the heat management in the interferometric mesh13,16. Future implementations could be dedicated to accelerate the operation, especially with faster, integrated and/or packaged power monitoring strategies implemented.

Cameragainvs exposure

Sharifi, S., Banadaki, Y., Veronis, G. & Dowling, J. P. Towards classification of experimental laguerre–gaussian modes using convolutional neural networks. Opt. Eng. 59, 1 (2020).

Phillips, R. L. & Andrews, L. C. Spot size and divergence for laguerre gaussian beams of any order. Appl. Opt. 22, 643–644 (1983).

button changes de byte value output by the AD converter that codes for Black but does not alter the quality of the recording. If you

Rui, G., Gu, B., Cui, Y. & Zhan, Q. Detection of orbital angular momentum using a photonic integrated circuit. Sci. Rep. 6, 28262 (2016).

The maximum values in YCbCr are normally 235,235,235 (or in some cases such as many forms of MPEG 235,240,240). This would be white, but it’s white because when Cb and Cr are 235(240) this means there is no difference between. I don’t understand why you are denoting the CbCr components as having a maximum value of 128, this is incorrect. Generally any chroma subsampling takes the form of less samples rather than reduced bit depth.

ex.: Gain at -6dB = noise reduced by 2, Gain at +6db = noise x 2, but there are side effects. The gain circuitry woks often as

Here, we advance the utilization of photonic integrated processors to spatially resolve amplitude and phase of light, recently reported in Ref. 15, with a focus on applications involving structured light. We discuss and demonstrate the detection and distinction of structured higher-order light beams, including but not limited to Laguerre-Gaussian modes. We specifically show how such a device, even with only 16 pixels, can distinguish a wide range of beams, e.g., Laguerre-Gaussian modes carrying orbital angular momentum. This is a next step towards an all-integrated, versatile and high-resolution platform for the measurement and control of amplitude and phase distributions of such beams, going far beyond information and functionality offered by a conventional camera. The results presented in this article extend the range of applications of multipurpose photonic processors, highlighting their strength in terms of controlling on-chip light for free-space applications.

The gain of the camera controls the video output and recording level, relative to the sensors signal level. If you use -3db gain you attenuate (reduce) the relative output signal. The highlight handling doesn’t change (governed by the sensor clipping or gamma curve mapping) but your entire image output level gets shifted down in brightness and as a result you will clip off or loose some of your shadow and dark information, so your overall dynamic range is also reduced as you can’t “see” so far into the shadows. Dynamic range is not just highlight handling, it is the entire range from dark to light. 3db is half a stop (6db = 1 stop) so -3db gain reduces the dynamic range by half a stop, reducing the cameras underexposure range without (in most cases) any change to the over exposure range, so overall the total dynamic range is reduced. When you add gain the reverse happens. Generally how far the sensor can see into the shadows is limited by the sensors noise floor. Add 6db of gain and you will make the darkest parts of the image brighter by 6db, but you will also raise the noise level by the same amount. So while you do end up with brighter shadow details you can’t actually see any more picture information because the noise level has increased by the same amount. At the top end as the brightest sensor output is mapped to the maximum recording level at 0db, when you add gain this pushes the recording level beyond what can be recorded, so you loose 6db off the top end of your recordings because the recordings and output clips 6db earlier. So positive gain maintains the same shadow range but reduces the highlight recording range by 6db. However you use it gain tends to reduce your dynamic range. Adding gain to cope with poor lighting tends to be the lesser of the two evils as generally if your struggling for light then overexposure and blown out highlights is often the last of your worries. Negative gain is sometimes used in camera to try to reduce noise, but the reality is that you are loosing dynamic range. Really a better solution would be to expose just a tiny bit brighter and then bring your levels down a bit in post production. Please Share If You Found This Useful. Sharing Helps Keep This Site Running And Encourages Me To write More!Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading... Related

ISO vsgainchart

Forbes, A., Dudley, A. & McLaren, M. Creation and detection of optical modes with spatial light modulators. Adv. Opt. Photon.8, 200 (2016).

Zinc sulfide, ZnS, occurs in nature as the mineral sphalerite and may be prepared by treating solutions of zinc salts with hydrogen sulfide. It was long used as ...

the deep shadows are disolved in the noise of the sensor and the noise of the analog amplifier. What you see in dark shadows is the

noise modulated by the light of the frame and this cause an over exposure of this deep shadows because the positive brightness peeks

technical directors. If you think YUV is the same as RGB because they have the same bit depth, you are not right! Only a gray image

set it to -15, you record in the 0-255 space, very usefull if the goal is to convert your video to RGB photos, which can be done as

Fundamental to the photonic integrated processor is its interface to free space on the left (blue) which is used to sample free-space light distributions. This interface can feature any layout of grating couplers, e.g., a regular grid-like layout similar to pixels of a normal camera. However, our prototype device is restricted to 16 grating couplers and has thus been carefully designed to enable multiple applications. The chosen arrangement along two concentric rings is, for example, well suited for applications featuring rotational symmetry. Details on this ring-like layout are discussed in more detail in the method section. The final crucial aspect of the photonic integrated processor is how on-chip light is processed in the interferometric mesh which acts as a central light processing unit, see Fig. 1b. Mach-Zehnder interferometers (yellow) arranged in a binary-tree can reroute the flow of light across the chip. On-chip amplitudes and phases can be accurately controlled across the interferometric mesh. Light coupled into the circuit via the free-space interface and traveling through the mesh can, for example, be processed to be fully or partially combined in a single output waveguide thus enabling sorting, merging or adapting to free-space modes. Alternatively, by running light backward through the programmed mesh, this platform can also be used for other purposes. Modes of arbitrary relative intensity and phase could be generated in the circuit and emitted into free-space to form tailored distributions of structured light13, similar to optical phased arrays or beam shapers30,31. Note, that while the central light processing unit does not introduce any fundamental loss14, the manufactured on-chip components are not perfect, and, e.g., waveguide side-wall roughness is introducing transmission losses. However, these are smaller than 2 dB over the whole photonic circuit and their impact can be further mitigated by routing the waveguides such that they share the same geometrical lengths. This can be seen in Fig. 1a between the free-space interface and the central light processing unit. Remaining losses are thus balanced and do not affect the measured relative amplitudes.

work without an issue, the sensor must be capable of delivering 0.6 x 1.9952 volts = 1.19721 volts but in my example, he is

YCbCr=244, 63, 207 (bright red part in a lava flow) = RGB 365.63!!, 219.75, 126.08. I have very often G or B=290. This values are

saturated at 1 volt (the input stage of the analog amplifier can also be saturated). Your highlights are thus clipped, the camera

However in most cases adding or removing gain reduces the cameras dynamic range as it will artificially clip or limit your low key or high key parts of the image. The maximum illumination level that a camera can capture is limited by the sensor or the gamma curves that the camera has. The black level or darkest part of the image is the point where the actual image signal compared to the sensor noise level is high enough to allow you to see some actual picture information (also known as noise floor). So the dynamic range of the camera is normally the range between the sensors noise floor and recording or sensor clipping point. To maximise the cameras dynamic range the designers will have carefully set the nominal zero db gain point (native ISO) so that the noise floor is at or very close to black and the peak recording level is reached at the point where the sensor itself starts to clip. The gain of the camera controls the video output and recording level, relative to the sensors signal level. If you use -3db gain you attenuate (reduce) the relative output signal. The highlight handling doesn’t change (governed by the sensor clipping or gamma curve mapping) but your entire image output level gets shifted down in brightness and as a result you will clip off or loose some of your shadow and dark information, so your overall dynamic range is also reduced as you can’t “see” so far into the shadows. Dynamic range is not just highlight handling, it is the entire range from dark to light. 3db is half a stop (6db = 1 stop) so -3db gain reduces the dynamic range by half a stop, reducing the cameras underexposure range without (in most cases) any change to the over exposure range, so overall the total dynamic range is reduced. When you add gain the reverse happens. Generally how far the sensor can see into the shadows is limited by the sensors noise floor. Add 6db of gain and you will make the darkest parts of the image brighter by 6db, but you will also raise the noise level by the same amount. So while you do end up with brighter shadow details you can’t actually see any more picture information because the noise level has increased by the same amount. At the top end as the brightest sensor output is mapped to the maximum recording level at 0db, when you add gain this pushes the recording level beyond what can be recorded, so you loose 6db off the top end of your recordings because the recordings and output clips 6db earlier. So positive gain maintains the same shadow range but reduces the highlight recording range by 6db. However you use it gain tends to reduce your dynamic range. Adding gain to cope with poor lighting tends to be the lesser of the two evils as generally if your struggling for light then overexposure and blown out highlights is often the last of your worries. Negative gain is sometimes used in camera to try to reduce noise, but the reality is that you are loosing dynamic range. Really a better solution would be to expose just a tiny bit brighter and then bring your levels down a bit in post production. Please Share If You Found This Useful. Sharing Helps Keep This Site Running And Encourages Me To write More!Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading... Related

Well if you are underexposed, dynamic range is the least of your worries, so don’t worry about adding gain or increasing the ISO if it’s the ONLY way you can increase your exposure.

but let the exposure to Auto: in a properly disinged camcorder, nothing happens to the frame, only the noise level changes. For

Willner, A. E., Pang, K., Song, H., Zou, K. & Zhou, H. Orbital angular momentum of light for communications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 041312 (2021).

1) You lower the gain (-3db) °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° The automatic exposure circuitry opens the diaphragm to admit 3db more light on the sensor wich delivers now 0,6 volts x 1.41253 =

Due to the math, the 3 colors of a pixel can not be above 255 at the same time. A program like After Effects has an RGB core and

Measured phases (squares) of Laguerre-Gaussian beams of different azimuthal order. The phase is measured at the grating coupler / pixel positions numbered clockwise around the free-space interface. The phase increases linearly (fits shown as solid lines) and the overall change in phase around the ring varies by multiples of 2π. a Laguerre-Gaussian beams of azimuthal order 1 to 6. b Laguerre-Gaussian beams of azimuthal order -1 to -6.

Your gain curves are not correct: they start all at 0 IRE. It’s the Setup Level or the Pedestal wich adjust the black level. If you lower the gain, the dynamic of your image is exactly the same with the same percentage of noise but, because your image is darker, you lose bit depth wich is a whole other issue. If you shoot in Rec.709, wich has low dynamic for the sensor, set the gain to a negative values and set the zebra at 109 IRE. Doing so, you lower the noise and use the max. bit depth. Downgrading to the very bad broadcast safe range must be the last step.

follow: the pixels of the sensor deliver an analog voltage that is feed to the input of analog amplifier. The gain button acts on

An illustration of the setups core components is shown in Fig. 2a. A free-space laser beam with a wavelength of 1570 nm is converted into a scalar spatial mode of light using a reflective phase-only spatial light modulator. The resulting higher-order beam is polarized circularly before finally passing a lens of 300 mm focal length. The beam is weakly focused and thus matched in size to the free-space interface in order to only illuminate the grating couplers on the ring-like layout. The beam waist of the focused Gaussian beam was ~250 μm, with the spot size of higher-order beams increasing accordingly32,33. The photonic processor is wire-bonded to a printed circuit board (PCB). The structured beam impinges normally onto the free-space interface where it couples to on-chip waveguide modes. The resulting on-chip light travels across the interferometric mesh and is processed by reconfiguring all interferometers while the transmitted on-chip intensities are recorded. In this experiment this is done off-chip by imaging the monitoring interface onto a conventional camera via a D-shaped pick-off mirror. Alternatively, power monitoring could be fully integrated on-chip, thus no longer requiring grating couplers. Both off-chip and on-chip power monitoring is discussed in more detail in the method section.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

has a direct byte to byte correspondance. It’s simple to fast understand what happens with the YUV coding: if Y=255 and Cb=Cr=128 (8

Before we describe how the photonic processor was used experimentally to measure higher-order beams we briefly discuss the utilization of the interferometric mesh. All mentioned applications rely on processing light in the central light processing unit while monitoring resulting waveguide intensities. One approach to measure unknown amplitude and phase distributions is based on self-alignment and power minimizations11,14, after training the device with specifically designed input distributions of light. Tracking/configuration times of interferometric meshes operated this way can be sub-millisecond, enabling fast operation and self-stabilization5,16. However, the specific training distributions require prior generation, and it can be challenging and demand elaborate setups to accurately send them onto the free-space interface. A second approach, described in detail in Ref. 15, relies on calibrating the interferometric mesh with a single reference input beam thereby characterizing all on-chip components simultaneously. This reveals the full transmission matrix of the mesh, which can be utilized in subsequent applications to configure the mesh as required. On-chip waveguide modes can now be examined by monitoring the effect the interferometric mesh has on the transmitted intensities upon processing. The photonic system, utilized this way, can handle imperfect components like non 50:50 on-chip beam splitters, and no further training of the device is required. Here we follow the second approach and further details on the principle of operation of the photonic integrated processor are discussed in the method section. We calibrate the mesh with a circularly polarized Gaussian beam of sufficient diameter (2 mm) to act as amplitude and phase reference. Unknown free-space distributions of light can afterwards be analyzed with regard to their relative amplitudes and phases at the grating coupler positions of the free-space interface.

We all know that increasing the gain to lets say +6db will increase noise and generally the reverse holds true when you reduce the gain, the noise typically reduces and this may be helpful if you are going to do a lot of effects work, or just want a clean image. However in most cases adding or removing gain reduces the cameras dynamic range as it will artificially clip or limit your low key or high key parts of the image. The maximum illumination level that a camera can capture is limited by the sensor or the gamma curves that the camera has. The black level or darkest part of the image is the point where the actual image signal compared to the sensor noise level is high enough to allow you to see some actual picture information (also known as noise floor). So the dynamic range of the camera is normally the range between the sensors noise floor and recording or sensor clipping point. To maximise the cameras dynamic range the designers will have carefully set the nominal zero db gain point (native ISO) so that the noise floor is at or very close to black and the peak recording level is reached at the point where the sensor itself starts to clip. The gain of the camera controls the video output and recording level, relative to the sensors signal level. If you use -3db gain you attenuate (reduce) the relative output signal. The highlight handling doesn’t change (governed by the sensor clipping or gamma curve mapping) but your entire image output level gets shifted down in brightness and as a result you will clip off or loose some of your shadow and dark information, so your overall dynamic range is also reduced as you can’t “see” so far into the shadows. Dynamic range is not just highlight handling, it is the entire range from dark to light. 3db is half a stop (6db = 1 stop) so -3db gain reduces the dynamic range by half a stop, reducing the cameras underexposure range without (in most cases) any change to the over exposure range, so overall the total dynamic range is reduced. When you add gain the reverse happens. Generally how far the sensor can see into the shadows is limited by the sensors noise floor. Add 6db of gain and you will make the darkest parts of the image brighter by 6db, but you will also raise the noise level by the same amount. So while you do end up with brighter shadow details you can’t actually see any more picture information because the noise level has increased by the same amount. At the top end as the brightest sensor output is mapped to the maximum recording level at 0db, when you add gain this pushes the recording level beyond what can be recorded, so you loose 6db off the top end of your recordings because the recordings and output clips 6db earlier. So positive gain maintains the same shadow range but reduces the highlight recording range by 6db. However you use it gain tends to reduce your dynamic range. Adding gain to cope with poor lighting tends to be the lesser of the two evils as generally if your struggling for light then overexposure and blown out highlights is often the last of your worries. Negative gain is sometimes used in camera to try to reduce noise, but the reality is that you are loosing dynamic range. Really a better solution would be to expose just a tiny bit brighter and then bring your levels down a bit in post production. Please Share If You Found This Useful. Sharing Helps Keep This Site Running And Encourages Me To write More!Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading... Related

the sensor is now 0 to 0.3007 volts (= 0.6/1.9952). But the noise level of the sensor is constant. Because you have the same noise

HOME>; Hand Tools>; Wrenches and Drivers>; LIMITED EDITION - ALLEN WRENCH 1.5 MM. LIMITED EDITION - ALLEN WRENCH 1.5 MM. Double-tap and hold to zoom.

Integrated photonic devices are pivotal elements across research fields that involve light-based applications. Particularly versatile platforms are programmable photonic integrated processors, which are employed in applications like communication or photonic computing. Free-space distributions of light can be coupled to such processors, which subsequently control the coupled light on-chip within meshes of programmable optical gates. This enables access to the spatial properties of free-space light, particularly its relative phase, which is usually challenging to measure. Here, we discuss and show the detection of amplitude and phase distributions of structured higher-order light beams using a multipurpose photonic processor. This can be used to directly distinguish light’s orbital angular momentum without including additional elements interacting with the free-space light. We envision applications in a range of fields that rely on the spatial distributions of light’s properties, such as microscopy or communications.

It might be possible for some remapping to be done, similar to the active knee that is often on ENG style cameras. However you would still increase the noise, and you would perform such remapping at the expense of tonal range because you would have to compress the highlights, and possibly end up affecting other parts of the image.

While the detector’s resolution with 16 pixels is limited, it allows for distinguishing the orbital angular momentum of input beams. The ring-like layout of the free-space interface does not resolve radial information with sufficient resolution, and we thus set the radial index of Laguerre-Gaussian input modes tested here to zero. We only measure azimuthal changes along the ring-like layout and thus change the index l of the input beams LG0,l. This index is associated with the beam’s orbital angular momentum. For a given LG0,l beam, the relative phases between neighboring pixels in the transverse plane increase or decrease linearly, depending on the sense of the spiraling phase-front of the beam. The overall phase change around the ring is l ⋅ 2π. We show our experimental results of the measured phases for LG modes of azimuthal index 1 to 6 and -1 to -6 in Fig. 4(a) and (b), respectively. The measured phase values nicely follow the expected linear behavior with beams of higher azimuthal indices featuring a steeper slope. By fitting a linear regression to the measured data we can extract the individual slopes s of the curves and calculate the associated orbital angular momentum l = 16s/2π of the various input beams. We include these linear fits in Fig. 4. The results of this orbital angular momentum retrieval method along with the resulting standard error are shown in Table 1. The retrieved orbital angular momentum values match the azimuthal index of the Laguerre-Gaussian input beams very well, both in case of positive and negative azimuthal indices. Deviations from the expected integer values of l are small and could arise from modal impurities of the input beam or other small systematic measurement errors. This shows that our photonic processor detects phases of higher-order beams very accurately and can be used to distinguish such beams based on phase information alone, which conventionally is difficult to access.

CCD. Charge coupled devices, or CCDs, are sensitive detectors of photons that can be used in telescopes instead of film or photographic plates to produce images ...

To demonstrate the capabilities of the integrated photonic processor in terms of measurements of higher-order beams and, where applicable, the identification of their orbital angular momentum, we measured different Hermite-Gaussian (HG)34 and Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) beams23. In Fig. 3 we show the theoretical as well as measured amplitude and phase profiles of a Hermite-Gaussian beam HG1,0, a HG1,1 beam and a Laguerre-Gaussian beam LG0,1. Theoretical distributions are plotted with high resolution in the background. Measured amplitude and phase values are superimposed as squares at the positions of the 16 individual grating couplers within the free-space interface of the photonic processor. To allow for a comparative analysis of relative amplitudes and to mitigate the impact of varying overall intensities, both the theoretical amplitude distributions and the measured amplitude values are normalized using their respective mean at the grating coupler positions. This normalization process ensures that both amplitude distributions center around a mean value of 1, and the relative variations in amplitude become qualitatively comparable. Theoretical expectation and experimental data are in very good agreement. In detail, the measured phases nicely follow both the abrupt phase changes of the Hermite-Gaussian beams and the gradually azimuthally changing phase in case of the Laguerre-Gaussian beam. For the latter, the phase clearly increases around the ring from 0 by 2π, corresponding to an orbital angular momentum of 1, i.e., the azimuthal index of the LG0,1 beam. Minor deviations of the measured values could arise due to the intricate alignment of this few-pixels detector relative to the distributions of the light beam, modal imperfections of the input beams or minor systematic errors in the calibration, measurement or imaging of the photonic processor. These results showcase how our photonic processor can measure higher-order beams and provide insights into their amplitude and phase information.

This work was supported by the European Commission through the H2020 project SuperPixels (grant 829116). The financial support by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Labor and Economy, the National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development and the Christian Doppler Research Association is gratefully acknowledged. The authors acknowledge the financial support by the University of Graz. The authors thank all members of the SuperPixels consortium for fruitful discussions and collaboration. We thank Maziyar Milanizadeh, Francesco Morichetti, Charalambos Klitis, and Marc Sorel for the photonic circuit design.

Annoni, A. et al. Unscrambling light-automatically undoing strong mixing between modes. Light Sci. Appl. 6, e17110 (2017).

which is reserved to support negative gain values. Examine the following case assuming that the aperture is set to auto and the

2) You lower the gain (-6db) °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° The aperture is open to admit 1.9952 x more light and the gain of the analog amplifier is lowered by the same amount. For this to

Berkhout, G. C. G., Lavery, M. P. J., Courtial, J., Beijersbergen, M. W. & Padgett, M. J. Efficient sorting of orbital angular momentum states of light. Phys. Rev. lett. 105, 153601 (2010).

The 8 (10) bit values of the luminance signal (Y) is 16-235 (64-959) if you shoot at 100 IRE and 16-255 (64-1023) if you shoot at

You should try looking at the actual output of many cameras. 0dB = unity gain, nominally nothing being added to the sensors output. -6dB is not less gain (you can’t have less gain than unity), 6dB is subtracted from the signal after the A to D. As a result the darkest parts of the image are no longer visible. This is easily measurable and this is the way many cameras actually behave.

assume it is 16-235, such as interpreded by many NLE’s, then the resulting RGB values are scaled a lot higher due to the conversion

Negative gain is sometimes used in camera to try to reduce noise, but the reality is that you are loosing dynamic range. Really a better solution would be to expose just a tiny bit brighter and then bring your levels down a bit in post production. Please Share If You Found This Useful. Sharing Helps Keep This Site Running And Encourages Me To write More!Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading... Related

Perhaps what you are saying is over my head but it sounds like you are saying the DR is limited by the recording range? Why wouldn’t they be able to take whatever values come out of the ADC and map them to fit the recording range if it is designed properly? They are presumably doing lots of other processing to the ADC output: debayering, applying gamma, matrix, bit downsampling, etc…

camcorder file and do the conconversion with the YUV to RGB Rec.709 conversion math. It’s so that my Sony has shoot Rec.709

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

a Input beams are weakly focused onto the free-space interface of the photonic processor where they couple to on-chip waveguide modes which are processed on-chip in a mesh of interferometers while transmitted intensities are recorded off-chip by imaging the monitoring interface. b, c Ultimately, not only amplitude but also the phase information of the input beams is measured at each grating coupler position.

Measured values are shown as squares at the 16 individual grating coupler positions. Theoretically calculated distributions are shown in the background. a Hermite-Gaussian beam HG1,0. b Hermite-Gaussian beam HG1,1. c Laguerre-Gaussian beam LG0,1.

P.B., J.S.E., V.S. and J.B. conceived the idea. V.S. and D.B. performed the experiment. V.S. and J.B. analyzed the data. V.S., J.B. and P.B. wrote the manuscript. P.B. supervised the project.

To maximise the cameras dynamic range the designers will have carefully set the nominal zero db gain point (native ISO) so that the noise floor is at or very close to black and the peak recording level is reached at the point where the sensor itself starts to clip. The gain of the camera controls the video output and recording level, relative to the sensors signal level. If you use -3db gain you attenuate (reduce) the relative output signal. The highlight handling doesn’t change (governed by the sensor clipping or gamma curve mapping) but your entire image output level gets shifted down in brightness and as a result you will clip off or loose some of your shadow and dark information, so your overall dynamic range is also reduced as you can’t “see” so far into the shadows. Dynamic range is not just highlight handling, it is the entire range from dark to light. 3db is half a stop (6db = 1 stop) so -3db gain reduces the dynamic range by half a stop, reducing the cameras underexposure range without (in most cases) any change to the over exposure range, so overall the total dynamic range is reduced. When you add gain the reverse happens. Generally how far the sensor can see into the shadows is limited by the sensors noise floor. Add 6db of gain and you will make the darkest parts of the image brighter by 6db, but you will also raise the noise level by the same amount. So while you do end up with brighter shadow details you can’t actually see any more picture information because the noise level has increased by the same amount. At the top end as the brightest sensor output is mapped to the maximum recording level at 0db, when you add gain this pushes the recording level beyond what can be recorded, so you loose 6db off the top end of your recordings because the recordings and output clips 6db earlier. So positive gain maintains the same shadow range but reduces the highlight recording range by 6db. However you use it gain tends to reduce your dynamic range. Adding gain to cope with poor lighting tends to be the lesser of the two evils as generally if your struggling for light then overexposure and blown out highlights is often the last of your worries. Negative gain is sometimes used in camera to try to reduce noise, but the reality is that you are loosing dynamic range. Really a better solution would be to expose just a tiny bit brighter and then bring your levels down a bit in post production. Please Share If You Found This Useful. Sharing Helps Keep This Site Running And Encourages Me To write More!Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading... Related

Christian Doppler Laboratory for Structured Matter Based Sensing, Institute of Physics, Universitätsplatz 5, 8010, Graz, Austria

Max Planck-University of Ottawa Centre for Extreme and Quantum Photonics, 25 Templeton St., Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read More

a Optical microscope image. On-chip light flows from left-to-right and is processed losslessly in a central mesh of reconfigurable Mach-Zehnder interferometers (yellow). b Schematic view of the central light processing unit’s waveguide and interferometer layout.

However you use it gain tends to reduce your dynamic range. Adding gain to cope with poor lighting tends to be the lesser of the two evils as generally if your struggling for light then overexposure and blown out highlights is often the last of your worries. Negative gain is sometimes used in camera to try to reduce noise, but the reality is that you are loosing dynamic range. Really a better solution would be to expose just a tiny bit brighter and then bring your levels down a bit in post production. Please Share If You Found This Useful. Sharing Helps Keep This Site Running And Encourages Me To write More!Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading... Related

Bütow, J., Eismann, J. S., Sharma, V., Brandmüller, D. & Banzer, P. Generating free-space structured light with programmable integrated photonics. arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08963 (2023).

4) Catasrophic clipping issue °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° I just said that you can lossless convert Rec.709 0-255 YCbCr to sRGB. This is in fact not true because the 65536 colors levels that

Milanizadeh, M. et al. Coherent self-control of free-space optical beams with integrated silicon photonic meshes. Photon. Res. 9, 2196 (2021).

109 IRE to better use the whole bit depth and thus reduce the banding artifacts. Now what happens exactly if you modify the Gain

noise). Assume also that the 0.6 volts sensor signal is converted to the byte value 255. Then, the 0.6 to 1 volt range is the room

Could you cite any sources or tests? The article seems pretty vague without addressing any particular camera’s implementation and without mentioning likely DR limitations imposed by the ADC versus the sensor, which is common in cameras with adjustable gain. The sensor itself is an analog device and has a fixed DR, gain generally only is used to workaround the downside of a DR-limited ADC. At least that is my understanding for most common implementations.

This special layout of the free-space interface was specifically chosen to enable experiments that carry information mainly along the azimuthal direction, like the presented distinction of OAM of structured higher-order beams. However, the grating couplers sample (and emit) light of a specific wavelength predominantly under a specific angle (~12∘ at 1550 nm). Consequently, to ensure even coupling to all grating couplers with different local orientations, normal incidence is required. This shifts the wavelength at which the grating couplers operate most efficiently to longer wavelengths. To maintain a reasonable efficiency we adjust the wavelength of operation to 1570 nm. While the photonic circuit can still be calibrated and operated at this wavelength, operation at the design wavelength of the photonic components would be favorable. Experimentally, the need for normal incidence requires a thorough alignment with respect to the input light distribution. Misalignments are penalized by the resulting imbalance in the coupling efficiencies of the individual grating couplers. Additionally, at this stage, our few-pixel detector demands thorough alignment of the input light distribution with respect the position of the free-space interface. However, future generations of this device with more pixels (most likely in a grid like arrangement) will facilitate the detectors’ usability. The focus will be more on the application than the layout of the free-space interface.

How to usegain in video

Such a free-space interface intricately connects these devices to distributions of free-space modes and their natural next application is the measurement and distinction of higher-order light beams that feature intricate amplitude and phase distributions. Such beams are facilitated in advanced applications like microscopy, communication or quantum entanglement18,19,20,21,22. However, intensity-only measurements are usually blind to phase or polarization of such beams, although information is usually encoded in these parameters. For their characterization, more elaborate approaches are required. For example, identifying the helical phase-front of a Laguerre-Gaussian beam and the related property of orbital angular momentum23 requires phase sensitive spatially or angularly resolved measurements, which can be experimentally challenging. Consequently, considerable research has been focusing on the convenient identification of such beams with orbital angular momentum24 using interferometry, Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors, spatial light modulators25,26, convolutional neural network based approaches27 or specifically designed integrated components28,29.

So if we start with YCbCr at 235,235,235. if you do reduce Y from lets say 235 down to 200, so we have 200,235,235 there would be very little saturation because the difference between the luma and Cb or Cr is only 35 and this can also be represented just the same in RGB as R, G, and B will all be less than 255,255,255. YCbCr does not contain more colour information than RGB, it is simply represented in a manner that more closely resembles human vision and allows the less visually important chroma elements to be recorded with reduced resolution to save bandwidth.

totaly different: the color lavels that are encoded in YUV are not the same as in RGB. This is sadly not know by almost all the

We have discussed and experimentally demonstrated the measurement of higher-order light beams using a multipurpose photonic integrated processor. Its free-space interface in combination with the on-chip light processing resolves amplitudes at the grating coupler positions while simultaneously also locally measuring relative phases. We showed the potential of such measurements by recording spatial amplitude and phase distributions of higher-order Hermite- and Laguerre-Gaussian beams and distinguishing Laguerre-Gaussian beams with azimuthal indices of up / down to ± 6. With only 16 pixels, this platform proves to be a powerful and versatile contender for characterizing orbital angular momentum and other free-space distributions of light. Recent advances related to programmable photonic processors could be readily implemented, extending the presented multipurpose photonic processor platform and directly improving its ability to measure amplitude and phase distributions. Larger and more generic input interfaces, polarization resolving grating couplers, the transition to visible wavelengths or full integration of the monitoring interface are just a small selection of possible improvements. Already in its current form, the presented higher-order beam measurement of amplitude and phase as well as orbital angular momentum is a powerful tool and will find applications across various fields where, for instance, such knowledge gives deeper insights into the interaction processes light might have undergone with matter or the environment prior to detection.

The gain does not alter the black level which is always black = byte 16 if the Black Level is set at 0 in the menu. The Black Level

109 IRE to better use the whole bit depth and thus reduce the banding artifacts. Now what happens exactly if you modify the Gain

Oct 4, 2024 — Some typical refractive indices for yellow light (wavelength equal to 589 nanometres [10−9 metre]) are the following: air, 1.0003; water, 1.333 ...

If you lower the gain, yes all you would do is decrease the the amplitude of the signal. But negative gain in many cameras is subtractive and this pulls the sensors minimum output below zero. -3dB and -6dB is very often not just less gain but subtracts from the already processed sensor output so shadows go into negative values and are never seen. Plus very often the output then never reaches 109/100 IRE. You can clearly see this behaviour in the XDCAM EX, PMW and PDW series cameras as well as many others. Selecting negative gain will prevent full output from being reached even if the sensor DR exceeds the recording gamma. Not all cameras exhibit this behaviour but it is very common and results in reduced dynamic range.

the gain of this amplifier. Exemple: suppose a sensor capable of delivering max. 1 volt at full illumination, after what the

the maximum luminance but colored, that will say an RGB value where minimum one color must be higher than 255, wich is not possible

which is reserved to support negative gain values. Examine the following case assuming that the aperture is set to auto and the

In this work, the interferometric mesh is controlled and operated based on the approach described in Ref. 15. The structured light sampled by the grating couplers of the free-space interface is processed on-chip by sequentially reconfiguring the interferometers in the central light processing unit. For every set of configurations of the interferometric mesh the power of all resulting/transmitted waveguide modes is being monitored. This set of measured intensities can next be matched via a least-squares fitting routine to a set of modeled intensities, calculated by describing the overall system theoretically. This theoretical description contains the transmission matrix of the interferometric mesh, which characterizes the on-chip processing of light and, among others, holds the configuration state of the mesh as free parameter. The theoretical description also contains the relative input waveguide amplitudes and phases.

but let the exposure to Auto: in a properly disinged camcorder, nothing happens to the frame, only the noise level changes. For

Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M. W., Spreeuw, R. J. & Woerdman, J. P. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185–8189 (1992).

signal is clipped. On a black image, this sensor delivers ~0 volts (~ because there is noise). The following stage is an Analog to

Now, we discuss what information the photonic processor can record in these measurements and what its advantages are compared to, e.g., a normal camera. Nowadays, structured higher-order beams can be generated with ease and their properties with respect to intensity and phase distributions are well known theoretically. Experimentally, their intensity information can be accessed by, for example, placing a camera in the beam path of, e.g., a Laguerre-Gaussian beam LG0,1, which reveals its ring-like intensity distribution. However, a camera is blind for the helical phase-front and the associated orbital angular momentum of such a beam. In contrast, our photonic processor is capable of measuring amplitude and phase distributions simultaneously, compare Fig. 2b, c respectively. In case of the Laguerre-Gaussian beam this can be used to immediately access the featured helical phase front and orbital angular momentum, as we will discuss in detail in the results section. Note that while this information is not directly accessible to conventional cameras, other techniques and devices, mentioned in the introduction, are able to access the phase information of, e.g., higher-order beams. Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors with tens of thousands of pixels, for example, can also measure phase information. Our multipurpose photonic processor is a powerful and versatile addition to the list of phase sensitive devices. Note, that the underlying principle of converting free-space light into on-chip waveguide modes, and vice versa, enables numerous novel applications across multiple research fields13,14,15,16,17.

Sun, J., Timurdogan, E., Yaacobi, A., Hosseini, E. S. & Watts, M. R. Large-scale nanophotonic phased array. Nature 493, 195–199 (2013).

DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATIONS Ball lenses in their complete form have a long tradition of manufacturing and use. They are also a good starting point for making ...

64-1023 in a 10 bit NLE project. Increasing the black level has no sence. If you set it for ex. at +15, you have all your image

The situation is in fact more complicated and it is possible that the clipping will not be present in case 2 if you chose an other

Heck, M. J. Highly integrated optical phased arrays: photonic integrated circuits for optical beam shaping and beam steering. Nanophotonics 6, 93–107 (2017).

the gain of this amplifier. Exemple: suppose a sensor capable of delivering max. 1 volt at full illumination, after what the

In the implemented free-space interface the local orientation of each grating coupler is dependent on its azimuthal position. As mentioned above, each grating coupler locally couples only linearly polarized light into the photonic circuit. While this could be utilized to also measure polarization distributions of light in the future, here we concentrate on amplitude and phase distributions only. Thus, in the present work, we always use circularly polarized input light to avoid any dependences on polarization. Note, that the azimuthally changing orientation of the grating couplers in the free-space interface combined with the circular input polarization results in an additional geometric phase, which we subtracted before displaying the data in this article.

If have made an error whyle copy/pasting the above post and it needs deletion. I tryed to add the correct version but the site says that “It seems that you have already posted the same”. Please correct the situation.

Gain in videomeaning

Digital converter (AD) wich converts black (0 volts) to byte values centered on 16 (16 is black and “centered on” because there is

Lastly, we need to discuss how the photonic integrated processor is being controlled in order to record a sufficient set of transmitted intensities (iii). For this, we simultaneously scan all interferometers in the first column of the mesh, as indicated in Fig. 1b, through different configurations by applying a grid of 15-by-15 control voltages to the two integrated heaters of each respective interferometer. The transmitted intensities are being recorded. This is repeated sequentially for all four columns of the mesh. Control voltage values between 0.2 and 4 V where chosen to enable relative phase shifts between 0 and ~2π.

CameragaindB

Reference-class linear stage. High travel accuracy and load capacity thanks to recirculating ball bearing guides. Precision ball screw with 2 mm pitch.

Miller, D. A. B. Analyzing and generating multimode optical fields using self-configuring networks. Optica 7, 794 (2020).

The small-footprint integration of optical and photonic components allows for on-chip processing via controlled routing, interaction, and manipulation of light. Such photonic integrated circuits have paved the pathway towards the development of novel devices across various research areas1. More recently, actively controlled reconfigurable photonic integrated circuits have emerged and are being explored experimentally2,3,4. These chips process waveguide modes inside a reprogrammable light processing unit with the help of meshes of optical gates / Mach-Zehnder interferometers and thus losslessly manipulate relative on-chip amplitudes and phases across the photonic circuit. Tailoring, rerouting and assessing on-chip light in such interferometric meshes has enabled applications across various fields, like communication5, information processing and quantum optics6,7 and photonic computing and neural networks8,9,10. Programmable photonic processors like these can also be interfaced to free-space, e.g., via grating coupler based layouts. Operating where on-chip waveguide modes meet off-chip free-space light, the resulting photonic chips can be utilized in different ways and used for multiple purposes in free-space optics11,12. This can, for example, allow the targeted generation of structured light13, the measurement of amplitude and phase14,15, the separation of arbitrary modes16 or the coherent self-control of free-space modes17.

Bütow, J., Sharma, V., Brandmüller, D. et al. Photonic integrated processor for structured light detection and distinction. Commun Phys 6, 369 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-023-01489-2

One way to reduce the noise in a video camera image is to reduce the cameras gain. One way to increase the brightness of the image is to add gain. We all know that increasing the gain to lets say +6db will increase noise and generally the reverse holds true when you reduce the gain, the noise typically reduces and this may be helpful if you are going to do a lot of effects work, or just want a clean image. However in most cases adding or removing gain reduces the cameras dynamic range as it will artificially clip or limit your low key or high key parts of the image. The maximum illumination level that a camera can capture is limited by the sensor or the gamma curves that the camera has. The black level or darkest part of the image is the point where the actual image signal compared to the sensor noise level is high enough to allow you to see some actual picture information (also known as noise floor). So the dynamic range of the camera is normally the range between the sensors noise floor and recording or sensor clipping point. To maximise the cameras dynamic range the designers will have carefully set the nominal zero db gain point (native ISO) so that the noise floor is at or very close to black and the peak recording level is reached at the point where the sensor itself starts to clip. The gain of the camera controls the video output and recording level, relative to the sensors signal level. If you use -3db gain you attenuate (reduce) the relative output signal. The highlight handling doesn’t change (governed by the sensor clipping or gamma curve mapping) but your entire image output level gets shifted down in brightness and as a result you will clip off or loose some of your shadow and dark information, so your overall dynamic range is also reduced as you can’t “see” so far into the shadows. Dynamic range is not just highlight handling, it is the entire range from dark to light. 3db is half a stop (6db = 1 stop) so -3db gain reduces the dynamic range by half a stop, reducing the cameras underexposure range without (in most cases) any change to the over exposure range, so overall the total dynamic range is reduced. When you add gain the reverse happens. Generally how far the sensor can see into the shadows is limited by the sensors noise floor. Add 6db of gain and you will make the darkest parts of the image brighter by 6db, but you will also raise the noise level by the same amount. So while you do end up with brighter shadow details you can’t actually see any more picture information because the noise level has increased by the same amount. At the top end as the brightest sensor output is mapped to the maximum recording level at 0db, when you add gain this pushes the recording level beyond what can be recorded, so you loose 6db off the top end of your recordings because the recordings and output clips 6db earlier. So positive gain maintains the same shadow range but reduces the highlight recording range by 6db. However you use it gain tends to reduce your dynamic range. Adding gain to cope with poor lighting tends to be the lesser of the two evils as generally if your struggling for light then overexposure and blown out highlights is often the last of your worries. Negative gain is sometimes used in camera to try to reduce noise, but the reality is that you are loosing dynamic range. Really a better solution would be to expose just a tiny bit brighter and then bring your levels down a bit in post production. Please Share If You Found This Useful. Sharing Helps Keep This Site Running And Encourages Me To write More!Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading... Related

Chen, J., Chen, X., Li, T. & Zhu, S. On-chip detection of orbital angular momentum beam by plasmonic nanogratings. Laser Photon. Rev. 12, 1700331 (2018).

Ultimately, knowing either two of these three quantities, (i) input light, (ii) mesh configuration, and (iii) transmitted light, allows the unknown third quantity to be reconstructed. Consequently, we first want to fully characterize the transmission matrix of the interferometric mesh (ii) in our experiment, which requires a calibration routine. By using a reference input, i.e., a single beam with a well-known phase front and a uniform amplitude distribution across all grating couplers, the relative input waveguide amplitudes and phases can be fixed in the theoretical description of the system. Recording a set of transmitted intensities for various configurations of the interferometric mesh and matching it to the modeled intensities then reveals all relevant parameters of the transmission matrix, thus calibrating this part of the system.

Institute of Optics, Information and Photonics, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Staudtstr. 7/B2, 91058, Erlangen, Germany

Bogaerts, W. & Rahim, A. Programmable photonics: an opportunity for an accessible large-volume pic ecosystem. IEEE J. Select. Topics Quant. Electron. 26, 1–17 (2020).

ex.: Gain at -6dB = noise reduced by 2, Gain at +6db = noise x 2, but there are side effects. The gain circuitry woks often as

from 16-235 to RGB 0-255. The YUV coding has more dynamic than RGB in the colors, not in the gray scale, but more banding artifacts.

What is cameragain

Gain in videoapp

A die shot of the photonic integrated processor used in this work is shown in Fig. 1a. The utilized processor is composed of three major sections, each including multiple integrated components: (1) A central light processing unit comprised of a mesh of reconfigurable Mach-Zehnder interferometers (universal 2 × 2 optical gates), highlighted in yellow and also shown schematically in Fig. 1b. (2) A free-space interface connected to the mesh via single-mode waveguides, highlighted in blue, and (3) a monitoring interface, highlighted in red. The free-space and monitoring interface are composed of carefully arranged grating couplers terminating the individual waveguides. These grating couplers can either act as emitters to free space or they can be used to couple free-space light into the waveguides, sampling impinging light beams comparable to the pixels of a normal camera. Beyond the capabilities of conventional pixels, however, the phase information of the sampled light is preserved in the coupled waveguide modes that now travel across the chip. This is essential for the measurement of structured free-space light discussed in this manuscript. In reverse, when grating couplers couple out on-chip light into free space, the emitted light has the same relative intensities and phases as the terminated waveguide modes. Grating couplers can thus be utilized for off-chip power monitoring of waveguide modes transmitted through the interferometric mesh by means of imaging or fiber coupling via the monitoring interface (red).

Thank you for your reply. I give more precision but I think that the point 4 speaking over a big color issue is the most important.

Thank you for your reply. I give more precision but I think that the point 4 speaking over a big color issue is the most important and I have not found where to put it on your site.

It’s basic SNR theory. Gain doesn’t change SNR and as there is a finite recording range additional gain will push your levels beyond the design recording range so DR is reduced. If the original is 0 to 100% then adding gain will make the new signal bigger than 100%. We can’t record more than 100% so the signal is lost and dynamic range is reduced. Generally the DR of a camera is limited by either the sensor or A to D’s. So if a system is operating at it’s maximum DR, subtracting gain will reduce the DR as you will make small values too small to be useful.

to encode in RGB. The Edius eyedropper reads the exact RGB values and I have the same result when picking the YUV values in the

the sensor is now 0 to 0.3007 volts (= 0.6/1.9952). But the noise level of the sensor is constant. Because you have the same noise

Bütow, J. et al. Spatially resolving amplitude and phase of light with a reconfigurable photonic integrated circuit. Optica 9, 939 (2022).

of the noise are much higher than the shadows. To minimise this issue, the input of the analog amplifier is adapted (little positive

Pai, S. et al. Experimental evaluation of digitally verifiable photonic computing for blockchain and cryptocurrency. Optica 10, 552 (2023).

clips all the YUV levels at 235 at import time. Then, he scales this clipped signal up to 0-255 what is catastrophic. Resolve

3) You increase the gain by 6db °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° The gain of the analog amplifier is increased by 1.9952 and the aperture is closed by the same amount to compensate. The output of

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

follow: the pixels of the sensor deliver an analog voltage that is feed to the input of analog amplifier. The gain button acts on

I don’t think you understand how component works. You seem to be forgetting that what Cb and Cr represent is Blue MINUS Luma or Red MINUS luma. They are the DIFFERENCE between Luma and Chroma, Sometimes CbCr are called the “Colour difference components” because they describe how the colour differs from the brightness.