OEM Motorized Linear Stage Manufacturer and ... - Natsu - motorised linear stage
In my honest opinion, comparing these specialty cameras (because that’s what they are; they’re aimed at fashion and landscape photographers primarily) to the other offerings out there seems a little premature and silly.
This is where graduated neutral density filters can help. They darken the sky, reducing the dynamic range of the scene. Now the camera sensor can capture everything.
It’s just like when you could do with your 35mm camera, or not. There were people who needed medium format cameras, or even large ones. Sure, you should ask yourself if any given kind of camera is what you really need (unless you’re just the gear collector kind), and makes sense in your workflow, taking into account factors like storage needs and so on. Nobody forces you to buy 50MP cameras, nor these will be the only camera models available. If one feels diminished because there are 50MP cameras and he or she doesn’t own one, well, he or she… Read more »
While the approach described above works well, it has two problems: You have to take your camera off the tripod and alter the settings. It just takes too long! Time is especially a problem when shooting a sunrise or sunset, where the lighting conditions are changing fast. By the time you calculated the result, remounted your DSLR onto the tripod and reset all the settings, you have to start the process all over again! But what if you could leave your DSLR resting on the tripod and use your phone instead? What if the right filter density was calculated for you automatically? And if you could reduce the whole process down to two simple steps that take less than five seconds? Well, now you can - with AutoND!
In college she was recruited right off the air from her college radio station and went on to be on air talent for country, top 40, and alternative radio stations including a 2 year gig as an Emcee for Radio Disney.
WRT storage space….arguing against new technology due to memory needs or storage is really a false argument in my opinion.
Some people are skeptical of new technology, and some people embrace it. Larger MP will compete in those who are considering medium format without the cost of medium format cameras.
I think this was a good conversation starter without actually testing the camera. Everyone considering on purchasing this camera should ask themselves these questions and more. Let’s see how the images will hold up with higher ISO. If the new technology is there with better quality, then this camera could be the right tool for artist that’s interested in entering competitions or having their work displayed in galleries. Print photography is still relevant to many photographers in various industries. I would definitely say these new 50 Megapixel cameras will cater to a certain market like most technology does
NDfilterstops chart
All those extra megapixels also introduce another problem – downsizing by most on-line and social media sites. Unsophisticated downsizing can ruin the quality of an image and quickly invalidate the advantages that all those extra pixels were supposed to bring.
In landscape photography there is one common problem: the sky can be much brighter than the ground. This is often the case at sunrise or sunset. Most sensors in digital cameras are not able to catch the whole scale of bright and dark values of a scene with high dynamic range. Lights then tend to burn out, or dark parts loose all detail.
Is this discussion still valid? Just read the article about 50Mpixel: after starting with my aunt’s old Kodak b+w box camera, then an instamatic, then Minolta up to a BRILL X700, my first digital was an Olympus 5.5Mpxel MJU. The Fuji 1500 bridge cam was a BIG improvement, but I STILL see the benefit of the Nikon D800 36Mpxel over the 10Mpxel camera. My 30” x 20” print of a dolphin (Funghi, Dingle) head underwater sold over 50 copies, and many smaller prints as well: from 35mm film. I prefer to have 36Mpixel files I CAN enlarge, than 10Mpixel files… Read more »
Selling more megapixels is about marketing more than it is about utility and function. I liken it to the production of automobiles with 150 mph speedometers for use on roads with a max posted speed of 65 or 70.
Mylio Photos – Access your photos from anywhere, without the cloud! Easily showcase your photos on-the-go, resolve duplicates, find faces and look for those stunning locations.
Good article – most folks forget that a 4×6 print at sensible resolution only requires 2 MP. The average full-screen web picture needs even fewer. What all those extra megapixels do is offer freedom to crop the image to give the best composition.
Larger files from your camera will require more memory and more powerful computers to handle them. You are going to need to consider your storage situation. These files will take up quite a bit more space.
Time is especially a problem when shooting a sunrise or sunset, where the lighting conditions are changing fast. By the time you calculated the result, remounted your DSLR onto the tripod and reset all the settings, you have to start the process all over again!
totally agree. The best possible thing that photographers can do is not chase after the latest and bigger MP, its about settings and knowing your gear to the n’th degree.
Neutral density filterapp
Selling more megapixels is about marketing more than it is about utility and function. I liken it to the production of automobiles with 150 mph speedometers for use on roads with a max posted speed of 65 or 70.
Although I *like* the idea of a 50mp camera … I have 3 basic concerns here. 1) What I really want in a camera is better dynamic range. I think the jury is out on that one. 2) I shoot at ISO 12800 a lot. This camera only goes to 6400… but the jury is out as to the quality of 6400 (if it’s better than the 5DIII quality at 6400 then maybe it can be pushed). 3) Most of all…. I worry about DLA (diffraction limited aperture). The size of the pixels means that beyond f/6.7 the image starts… Read more »
MPB – Grab used but perfectly working cameras and lenses for less, or turn your old gear into cash by trading and selling them on MPB!
NDfilter calculatorapp
I totally agree. I’m using 16mp sensors for years now and never ran into the problem of low quality prints (tried max. A3). Why the the big camera manufacturers (especially Nikon and Canon) don’t change their thinking regarding megapixel vs. ISO performance is beyond me. Image quality is not a concern anymore with almost any camera. Now it’s about ease of use, build quality and extra features like weather sealing or built in WiFi. And compared to some of the mirrorless cameras out there, Nikon and Canon cameras are so far behind offering these features that I am seriously worried… Read more »
Photofocus.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Photofocus.com is also a participant in the B&H Photo and KEH Camera affiliate programs.
I totally agree. I’m using 16mp sensors for years now and never ran into the problem of low quality prints (tried max. A3). Why the the big camera manufacturers (especially Nikon and Canon) don’t change their thinking regarding megapixel vs. ISO performance is beyond me. Image quality is not a concern anymore with almost any camera. Now it’s about ease of use, build quality and extra features like weather sealing or built in WiFi. And compared to some of the mirrorless cameras out there, Nikon and Canon cameras are so far behind offering these features that I am seriously worried… Read more »
Here is the common approach: Take your DSLR and set a fixed ISO and aperture (Av mode) Use spot metering Focus on the brightest part oft the scene and note the shutter speed chosen by the camera Focus on the darkest part oft the scene and note the shutter speed chosen by the camera Calculate the difference in light from the two shutter speed values If the difference in light is bigger than five stops, use a filter that reduces the dynamic range to five stops While the approach described above works well, it has two problems: You have to take your camera off the tripod and alter the settings. It just takes too long! Time is especially a problem when shooting a sunrise or sunset, where the lighting conditions are changing fast. By the time you calculated the result, remounted your DSLR onto the tripod and reset all the settings, you have to start the process all over again! But what if you could leave your DSLR resting on the tripod and use your phone instead? What if the right filter density was calculated for you automatically? And if you could reduce the whole process down to two simple steps that take less than five seconds? Well, now you can - with AutoND!
Clearly this is a special purpose tool for landscape and studio photographers. IMO, the model with an AA filter is redundant.
Best NDfilter calculatorapp
Thats a bit narrow focus for the article Its hardly just a “50mp” camera without other improvements in the technology under the hood. Do we all really need 50mp? No we don’t but maybe it may be a good idea to see how it works in practice first before ripping it a new one on speculation and bluster. The possibilities for cropping are better for a start. The option to have the low pass filter not on are also fantastic for people who demand the sharpest of image quality. The focus on ISO and noise are also out of kilter… Read more »
Thats a bit narrow focus for the article Its hardly just a “50mp” camera without other improvements in the technology under the hood. Do we all really need 50mp? No we don’t but maybe it may be a good idea to see how it works in practice first before ripping it a new one on speculation and bluster. The possibilities for cropping are better for a start. The option to have the low pass filter not on are also fantastic for people who demand the sharpest of image quality. The focus on ISO and noise are also out of kilter… Read more »
You might need a new set of lenses. Lenses older than about five or six years might not be able to hold focus for the entire image. If you are a landscape photographer, you probably want clean and sharp edges. Your older lenses might do fine for the center of the image, but the rest of your image might be soft.
NDfilterchart drone
Ask yourself how and where you utilize your images. Are you and your clients mostly posting for web and social media? What are your largest print sizes? Honestly, unless your images are constantly on massive billboards, you do not need 50 megapixels.
Radiant Photo – Radiant Photo superior quality finished photos with perfect color rendition, delivered in record time. Your photos — simply RADIANT. The way they are meant to be.
Think about your editing workflow. You are going to see details and a lot of them. The amount of detail you see will affect how you process your image. You will zoom in and see lots of wrinkles but zoom out and it looks great. You will have much more information to work with and that may or may not be a good thing.
B&H – B&H is a world renowned supplier of all the gear photographers, videographers, and cinematographers need and want to create their very best work.
I usually shoot with a 46 MP Nikon D850, but on the first day of the Michigan City Great Lakes Grand Prix I opted to take both that and my 16 MP Nikon D4s. On the second day I took only my D4s, primarily to not carry so much gear but also to get the frame rate of 11 FPS vs. 8 FPS and process photos much faster afterwards. I wish I had taken only my D850, the detail on the photos is just so much better, and there’s a lot more room to crop (although I don’t like to)… Read more »
The Mark IV is rumoured to be coming out toward the end of the summer, and it’ll be the one that most of us will be drooling over, with a more reasonable megapixel count, better ISO sensitivity and dynamic range, and HOPEFULLY Canon will clue in and give us WiFi and GPS too. Until then, let’s just call these ones what they are; specialty, niche cameras.
Neutral density filter calculatorexcel
Clearly this is a special purpose tool for landscape and studio photographers. IMO, the model with an AA filter is redundant.
It’s just like when you could do with your 35mm camera, or not. There were people who needed medium format cameras, or even large ones. Sure, you should ask yourself if any given kind of camera is what you really need (unless you’re just the gear collector kind), and makes sense in your workflow, taking into account factors like storage needs and so on. Nobody forces you to buy 50MP cameras, nor these will be the only camera models available. If one feels diminished because there are 50MP cameras and he or she doesn’t own one, well, he or she… Read more »
Absolutely agree and hopefully I can get my hands on one soon and put it to the test. Maybe, it will blow us away but for now without saying they’ve improved anything else, I’m going to remain very skeptical.
WRT storage space….arguing against new technology due to memory needs or storage is really a false argument in my opinion.
In my honest opinion, comparing these specialty cameras (because that’s what they are; they’re aimed at fashion and landscape photographers primarily) to the other offerings out there seems a little premature and silly.
Good article – most folks forget that a 4×6 print at sensible resolution only requires 2 MP. The average full-screen web picture needs even fewer. What all those extra megapixels do is offer freedom to crop the image to give the best composition.
Pamela has worked in Film and Radio for over 15 years. She started as a PA on major sets and eventually moved up to script supervisor. From there the roles of producing, directing, editing and camera operator followed. She has worked with DGA and oscar winning directors. Currently her day job is Brand Experience Executive with a full service Ad Agency and production company. She is also working as a Director on a Documentary coming out in 2018.
Things are alway getting better, canon comes out with better lens and your lens is more then 5 years old its problem time to move up. Everyone knows that the glass makes the images #1. Just like it has alway been the lower the iso the better the images #2. but now the more pixels the more detail, the better the image. I have canon and mamiya. Anyone can take great images with a canon type camera, But You really need to know what you are doing to step up to the PRO level like Mamiya. Don’t nock 50,60 or… Read more »
But what if you could leave your DSLR resting on the tripod and use your phone instead? What if the right filter density was calculated for you automatically? And if you could reduce the whole process down to two simple steps that take less than five seconds?
Megapixel means that a camera can capture 1 million pixels per image. That means a 12 megapixel camera can capture 12 million pixels per image. Does that mean a 50 megapixel camera is amazing? Im sure the camera is amazing, but why would you need 50 megapixels?
Truthfully, more megapixels can possibly decrease your overall image quality. Your higher megapixel count will likely increase the noise ratio in the camera. Chances are you will have noise in your images that have a higher ISO.
Although I *like* the idea of a 50mp camera … I have 3 basic concerns here. 1) What I really want in a camera is better dynamic range. I think the jury is out on that one. 2) I shoot at ISO 12800 a lot. This camera only goes to 6400… but the jury is out as to the quality of 6400 (if it’s better than the 5DIII quality at 6400 then maybe it can be pushed). 3) Most of all…. I worry about DLA (diffraction limited aperture). The size of the pixels means that beyond f/6.7 the image starts… Read more »
Some people are skeptical of new technology, and some people embrace it. Larger MP will compete in those who are considering medium format without the cost of medium format cameras.
Absolutely agree and hopefully I can get my hands on one soon and put it to the test. Maybe, it will blow us away but for now without saying they’ve improved anything else, I’m going to remain very skeptical.
In the past, Pamela has tech edited books on Adobe Premiere Pro, Photoshop, After Effects, Illustrator & Motion. Her main love is being behind the camera whether its doing video or photography.
Experience four days of interactive, online training sessions featuring a range of educational content with experienced photographers and content creators. This free event kicks off with a series of technical boot camps to build essential skills, followed by live, online sessions on photography, video, business and social media. Join live from March 10-13, 2022!
Megapixel wars seem to be all the rage these days. Between the Sony a7R IV, the Nikon Z 7 II and Canon EOS R5 (not to mention medium format options), high-megapixel cameras are certainly becoming more and more common on the market.
NDfilter calculatorfor video
The Mark IV is rumoured to be coming out toward the end of the summer, and it’ll be the one that most of us will be drooling over, with a more reasonable megapixel count, better ISO sensitivity and dynamic range, and HOPEFULLY Canon will clue in and give us WiFi and GPS too. Until then, let’s just call these ones what they are; specialty, niche cameras.
However, it is important to choose the right filter. If the filter density is too strong, the image will look unnatural. If it is too weak, it might also look unnatural or even lose detail in the bright or dark parts.
NDfilterchart PDF
I agree, if you primarily shoot for Facebook or social media then 50 MP is not for you. One could argue that anything more than 2 MP is overkill for web publishing…so why have anything more than a point and shoot?
I agree, if you primarily shoot for Facebook or social media then 50 MP is not for you. One could argue that anything more than 2 MP is overkill for web publishing…so why have anything more than a point and shoot?
Camera shake is a big concern with 50 MP. Poor low light capability is my second concern – with more noise than 5d3. This camera is specialised use – it needs lots of light – as in Studio for 5dS or on a tripod I.e. Landscapes for 5dSR
I think this was a good conversation starter without actually testing the camera. Everyone considering on purchasing this camera should ask themselves these questions and more. Let’s see how the images will hold up with higher ISO. If the new technology is there with better quality, then this camera could be the right tool for artist that’s interested in entering competitions or having their work displayed in galleries. Print photography is still relevant to many photographers in various industries. I would definitely say these new 50 Megapixel cameras will cater to a certain market like most technology does
Absolutely, it could very much be the best camera’s canon has yet made. For now I’m a canon shooter and have been for many years. I actually need a new camera. Will these be an option, maybe? However, if 50MP is all they are promoting about these cameras, well my hopes aren’t too high. I could be wrong and like I mentioned they are probably going to be amazing cameras. 50 MP though, I’m still very much suspicious.
Pam, all 50 megapixel cameras can be set to shoot smaller 20mp images. I shoot high end portraits that are printed as life size or larger similar to Avadons American West series but I also shoot food for the web. In this case an inexpensive 5DS R is perfect. Just sayin.
Absolutely, it could very much be the best camera’s canon has yet made. For now I’m a canon shooter and have been for many years. I actually need a new camera. Will these be an option, maybe? However, if 50MP is all they are promoting about these cameras, well my hopes aren’t too high. I could be wrong and like I mentioned they are probably going to be amazing cameras. 50 MP though, I’m still very much suspicious.
totally agree. The best possible thing that photographers can do is not chase after the latest and bigger MP, its about settings and knowing your gear to the n’th degree.
Camera shake is a big concern with 50 MP. Poor low light capability is my second concern – with more noise than 5d3. This camera is specialised use – it needs lots of light – as in Studio for 5dS or on a tripod I.e. Landscapes for 5dSR
Things are alway getting better, canon comes out with better lens and your lens is more then 5 years old its problem time to move up. Everyone knows that the glass makes the images #1. Just like it has alway been the lower the iso the better the images #2. but now the more pixels the more detail, the better the image. I have canon and mamiya. Anyone can take great images with a canon type camera, But You really need to know what you are doing to step up to the PRO level like Mamiya. Don’t nock 50,60 or… Read more »
I personally would rather have lower megapixels and overall better ISO with less noise. My images aren’t being printed for massive buildings and billboards. If 50+ megapixels excites you, then go for it. Just understand the bigger picture.
All those extra megapixels also introduce another problem – downsizing by most on-line and social media sites. Unsophisticated downsizing can ruin the quality of an image and quickly invalidate the advantages that all those extra pixels were supposed to bring.