by F Lei · 1993 · Cited by 12 — Measurement of the numerical aperture and f-number of a lens system by using a phase grating. F. Lei and L. K. Dang. A simple method for measuring both the ...

Lenses with a focal length of 28mm to 35mm are called wide-angle lenses. These lenses provide a good balance of subject and background, and let you take a wide ...

Linearpolarization

\[\tan\theta = \dfrac{x_1}{6\;ft} \;\;\;\Rightarrow\;\;\; x_1 = \left(1.4\right)\left(6\;ft\right) = 8.4\;ft \nonumber\]

While most natural light is unpolarized and we can polarize it with a polaroid, it turns out that is not the only way it can be polarized. A more “natural” way to create polarized light exists thanks to reflection. As we have said many times, when light (or any wave) strikes an interface between two media, it is partially transmitted and partially reflected. Consider the following scenario: Light polarized in the vertical direction strikes an interface between media such that the reflected ray aligns with the electric field vectors of the transmitted ray. There is an important principle in physics that states that the conditions at the boundary have to work out properly. This means that the electric field vector of the incoming light must add up properly to the electric field after striking the interface. The electric field vector can of course be written in components with the “x-direction” being the electric field direction of the transmitted wave, and the “y-direction” being the direction of the reflected ray (which is perpendicular to the transmitted ray). But the outgoing light cannot have an electric field vector pointing along its direction of motion (light is a transverse wave), so no light reflects!

A paleontologist is looking for the remains of a wooly mammoth in an unusually clear section of a glacier. The glare off the ice from the sun makes it hard for her to see, so she puts on her polarized sun glasses and is immediately rewarded when, along the line where the glare is cut to zero, she finds what she is looking for. Now she just needs to figure out how deep the carcass is. Fortunately she has a physicist (you) on staff. You measure the height of her eyes above the ice surface to be \(6\;ft\), and you measure the distance from the position where she first saw the beast through the glare, to the point where you can look straight down at it. This distance is \(18.4\;ft\). You estimate the index of refraction of the ice to be 1.4. Find the depth of the wooly mammoth.

Circularpolarization

This process all comes down to what happens to the electric field vectors. After passing through the first polaroid, all the electric field vectors are aligned with that polaroid's polarizing axis. When those vectors come upon the second polaroid, just the component of the field vector that is aligned with the new axis gets through, resulting in a new vector shorter than the original.

\[n_1\sin\theta_B = n_2\sin\theta_2 = n_2\sin\left(90^o-\theta_B\right) = n_2\cos\theta_B \;\;\;\Rightarrow\;\;\; \tan\theta_B=\dfrac{n_2}{n_1} \; , \]

The Brewster angle occurs when the reflected light makes a right angle with the transmitted light, and from symmetry (just reverse the direction of the light to see this), that is also true of the incoming glare and the light from the mammoth. Therefore we can use \(x_2\) and the tangent of the angle to get the depth:

Types ofpolarization

A nice application of this effect involves polaroid sunglasses. Most glare from sunlight comes off surfaces that are horizontal (roads, lake surfaces, etc.), which means that the light that reflects off such surfaces has a relatively small fraction of its polarization in the vertical direction. This means that if we place polaroids in front of our eyes that are allow only vertically-polarized light to pass, then very little of the horizontally-polarized glare gets through. Of course, only half of the non-glare light gets through as well, but at least one's vision of light of important objects (on coming cars or boats, etc.) does not have to compete with the incoming light from glare.

One interesting application of this phenomenon is 3-D movies. Long ago someone came up with a brilliant idea for making movies projected onto a 2-D screen appear in 3-D. The idea is based on the fact that a large component (but not the only one) of seeing in 3-D is stereo vision. Your right eye sees objects from one perspective, while your left eye sees it from a slightly different perspective. You can see this is true by holding up your finger in a fixed position and alternately opening-and-closing each eye. Your finger’s position appears to change relative to the background. This inventor’s idea was to project not one but two images on the same screen. One image is recorded from the perspective of the right eye, and the other from the perspective of the left eye. Then the trick is to make the right-perspective image invisible to the left eye and the left-perspective image invisible to the right eye, so that each eye sees only its own perspective. The original inventor did this with colors – red lenses obscure red images, and yellow lenses obscure yellow light, so films were recorded from two perspectives, and each perspective was projected in a different color – one red and one yellow. But today we like our movies to be in realistic colors, so someone came up with the idea of projecting the two images with differently-polarized light, and then give viewers glasses that only admit the properly-polarized light into the respective eyes.

Polarizationof light notes PDF

This is known as Malus's law. Notice that it works exactly as we expect for the cases where the angle happens to be \(0^o\) and \(90^o\).

When the unpolarized light passes through the first filter, the intensity is cut in half and comes out polarized at \(0^o\). Then it passes through three successive filters, and applying Malus’s law for each \(30^o\) change of polarization angle brings in a factor of 0.75 for each polaroid. The result is that the final intensity is:

We can use this distance to derive the horizontal distance from the point of reflection to the point on the ice directly above the mammoth:

In order for the worst case exposure to occur, an individual's eye must be focussed at a distance and a direct beam or specular (mirror-like) reflection must enter the eye. The light entering the eye from a collimated beam in the retinal hazard region is concentrated by a factor of 100,000 times when it strikes the retina. Therefore, a visible, 10 milliwatt/cm2 laser beam would result in a 1000 watt/cm2 exposure to the retina, which is more than enough power density (irradiance) to cause damage. If the eye is not focussed at a distance or if the beam is reflected from a diffuse surface (not mirror-like), much higher levels of laser radiation would be necessary to cause injury. Likewise, since this ocular focussing effect does not apply to the skin, the skin is far less vulnerable to injury from these wavelengths.

If the eye is not focussed at a distance or if the beam is reflected from a diffuse surface (not mirror-like), much higher levels of laser radiation would be necessary to cause injury. Likewise, since this ocular focussing effect does not apply to the skin, the skin is far less vulnerable to injury from these wavelengths.

Analytically, the focal length is described by the lens maker's equation: 1/f = (n - 1)(1/R1 + 1/R2), where R1 and R2 are the radii of curvature, f is the focal ...

The laser produces an intense, highly directional beam of light. If directed, reflected, or focused upon an object, laser light will be partially absorbed, raising the temperature of the surface and/or the interior of the object, potentially causing an alteration or deformation of the material. These properties which have been applied to laser surgery and materials processing can also cause tissue damage. In addition to these obvious thermal effects upon tissue, there can also be photochemical effects when the wavelength of the laser radiation is sufficiently short, i.e., in the ultraviolet or blue region of the spectrum. Today, most high-power lasers are designed to minimize access to laser radiation during normal operation. Lower-power lasers may emit levels of laser light that are not a hazard.

Feb 15, 2020 — Yes, it is possible to amplify the light produced by a laser through a process known as optical amplification. This involves using an active ...

Polarizationby reflection

Whatis polarizationof waves in Physics

High quality optical fiber mechanical splices such as 3M Fibrlok, Corning Camsplice, AMP CoreLink, Siemon UltraSplice, and more. All In Stock.

Ball and Half Ball Lenses - VY Optoelectronics Co. Ltd. - Optical glass ball and half ball lenses. Spherical ball lenses are commonly used for laser c.

One might expect that since the first and last polaroids are at right angles to each other, no light at all should emerge from the last polaroid. But when the light passes through a polaroid, it gains a new polarization aligned with that polaroid's polarization axis, and has no "memory" of its previous plane of polarization. Unless two consecutive polaroids are at right angles, some light will always get through each polaroid.

Laser Institute of America12001 Research Parkway, Suite 210Orlando, FL 32826Toll Free: 800.34.LASERInternational: +1.407.380.1553

This material can have a dramatic effect on light passing through it. If the light is plane-polarized (see Figure 3.1.1), then its propagation through a medium will be affected by the preferential orientation of charge oscillations. When the light polarization is aligned with what we define as the polarizing axis of the substance, then little of the light is absorbed by the substance (i.e. the substance is transparent to this light), while if the light is polarized perpendicular to the polarizing axis, then virtually all of the light is absorbed. Such a filter is called a polaroid or polarizer.

Unpolarized light enters a series of four polaroids with axes of polarization that are each rotated \(30^o\) clockwise from the previous polaroid, making angles of \(0^o\), \(30^o\), \(60^o\), and \(90^o\) with some common reference point. What fraction of the intensity of the incoming light is the intensity of the outgoing light?

LASER is an acronym which stands for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. The energy generated by the laser is in or near the optical portion of the electromagnetic spectrum (see Figure 1). Energy is amplified to extremely high intensity by an atomic process called stimulated emission. The term "radiation" is often misinterpreted because the term is also used to describe radioactive materials or ionizing radiation. The use of the word in this context, however, refers to an energy transfer. Energy moves from one location to another by conduction, convection, and radiation. The color of laser light is normally expressed in terms of the laser's wavelength. The most common unit used in expressing a laser's wavelength is a nanometer (nm). There are one billion nanometers in one meter.

We can easily write down an expression for the "special angle" at which total polarization occurs (this is known as the Brewster angle), by noting that for this angle the reflected ray makes a right angle with the transmitted ray (because the field vector of the transmitted wave is perpendicular to the transmitted ray and is parallel to the reflected ray). Combining this fact with Snell's law gives the Brewster angle, \(\theta_B\):

Polarizationexamples

The optical transfer function, T(k'), is proportional to the ratio of the image intensity of a sinusoidal grating with spatial frequency k' to the object ...

\[I = I_o\left(\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\left(\cos^2 30^o\right)^3 = I_o\left(\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\left(\dfrac{3}{4}\right)^3=\dfrac{27}{128}I_o \nonumber\]

In addition to the direct hazards to the eye and skin from the laser beam itself, it is also important to address other hazards associated with the use of lasers. These non-beam hazards, in some cases, can be life threatening, e.g. electrocution, fire, and asphyxiation. Table 1 indicates some of the potential non-beam hazards associated with laser usage. Because of the diversity of these hazards, the employment of safety and/or industrial hygiene personnel to effect the hazard evaluations may be necessary.

Whatis polarizationin Chemistry

where \(n_1\) is the index of refraction of the medium within which the reflection is occurring, and \(n_2\) is the index of refraction of the medium off which the reflection is occurring.

Now let's consider what happens if we send the natural light through two polaroids in succession. Clearly when the light reaches the second polaroid it will be plane-polarized from the first one. If the second polaroid is oriented the same as the first, then all the light gets through, and the intensity is unchanged, and if its polarizing axis is at right angles to the first polaroid, then no light will get through it. But now we seek to determine the intensity of the light that passes through the second polaroid if the angle between their polarizing axes is somewhere between \(0^o\) and \(90^o\).

It does n't diffract in-house but does at synchrotron sources. When elementary particles collide at high energies they diffract off each other, just like waves ...

As stated previously when discussing the speed of light waves through transparent media, the mechanisms that govern light propagation through media are complicated. There is little we can say about it in this class, except to say that because the light wave is electromagnetic in nature, it interacts with electric charge, which is present in all matter. It so happens that it is possible to construct a solid substance which greatly restricts oscillatory motion of electric charges along a single dimension. The upshot of this is that the charges react to electric fields along one direction (or rather, components of electric fields along one direction), while they don't react along a perpendicular direction.

The electric field vector is the amplitude of the light wave, and we are interested in the intensity. As with any other wave, the intensity is proportional to the square of the amplitude, so the relationship between the outgoing intensity \(I\) and incoming intensity \(I_o\) is:

The human body is vulnerable to the output of certain lasers, and under certain circumstances, exposure can result in damage to the eye and skin. Research relating to injury thresholds of the eye and skin has been carried out in order to understand the biological hazards of laser radiation. It is now widely accepted that the human eye is almost always more vulnerable to injury than human skin. The cornea (the clear, outer front surface of the eye's optics), unlike the skin, does not have an external layer of dead cells to protect it from the environment. In the far-ultraviolet and far-infrared regions of the optical spectrum, the cornea absorbs the laser energy and may be damaged. Figure 2 illustrates the absorption characteristics of the eye for different laser wavelength regions. At certain wavelengths in the near-ultraviolet region and in the near-infrared region, the lens of the eye may be vulnerable to injury. Of greatest concern, however, is laser exposure in the retinal hazard region of the optical spectrum, approximately 400 nm (violet light) to 1400 nm (near-infrared) and including the entire visible portion of the optical spectrum. Within this spectral region collimated laser rays are brought to focus on a very tiny spot on the retina. This is illustrated in Figure 3.

The LibreTexts libraries are Powered by NICE CXone Expert and are supported by the Department of Education Open Textbook Pilot Project, the UC Davis Office of the Provost, the UC Davis Library, the California State University Affordable Learning Solutions Program, and Merlot. We also acknowledge previous National Science Foundation support under grant numbers 1246120, 1525057, and 1413739. Legal. Accessibility Statement For more information contact us at info@libretexts.org.

For the polarized sunglasses to remove all the glare, the angle the light makes with the perpendicular to the ice must be Brewster’s angle, so:

We have overly-simplified things here, in a couple of ways. First of all, a light wave does not have to arrive at the polarizer in either a parallel or perpendicular orientation – it could be aligned at any angle with the polarizing axis. What happens then? Well, electric fields are vector fields, which means they can be broken into components, so the component of the electric field that is parallel to the polarizing axis gets through, and the other component is absorbed.

The second oversimplification is that not all of the individual light waves that come from a source are necessarily polarized in the same direction. In fact “natural” light from light bulbs and the sun is “unpolarized,” which comes about because each of the individual light sources (atoms) are aligned in random orientations, and all send out random, unaligned light waves. When such light is passed through a polaroid, half the light gets through. To see why this should be so, break every electric field vector of every wave into components parallel and perpendicular to the polarizing axis. Because the wave polarization directions are randomly-oriented, there is no reason to expect there to be a greater sum of components along one axis than another. By “half the light gets through,” what do we mean? We mean that the intensity drops by one half. We look at the more general case of intensity next.

Jul 24, 2010 — The linear polarizer allows light polarized in one direction to pass through it. The light that is not allowed to pass through is gone. The ...

Of course this result is only for vertically-polarized incoming light, so unpolarized light that reflects at this angle will have its vertical component removed, which means that the reflected light is horizontally-polarized. More generally, light that is reflected off a surface at just the right angle will be polarized parallel to that surface. It also happens that if the angle is not just right, then while the light is not entirely polarized, it is partially so (depending upon how close to the correct angle the reflection is). By "partially polarized," we mean that the amplitude of light waves measured (using a polaroid) along one direction is not the same as the amplitude measured along the orthogonal direction. In practice this means that a polaroid aligned parallel to a surface from which the light is reflected will admit more light than a polaroid aligned perpendicular to that surface.

Microscopes use convex lenses in order to focus light. Image from http://clubsciencekrl.blogspot.com/. Microscope objectives contain lenses but are not as ...

Resolving the original electric field vector into components parallel and perpendicular to the polarizing axis, and keeping only the parallel part means that the new electric field vector magnitude is:

This page titled 3.7: Polarization is shared under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Tom Weideman directly on the LibreTexts platform.