Indeed, if you're aware of the effect you can try to avoid it. But it comes at a cost of less dark filters. If you need to buy more VND filters of different strengths, you might as well buy three regular ND filters. This way you avoid the effect completely. Regarding the infinite amount of densities, it rarely needed - speaking from years of experience.

Sometimes an extremely long exposure is needed to remove every trace of movement from the water. It’s often used for fine art or something similar. Exposures of minutes are not uncommon.

Laser divergence angleformula

However, if the strength of the water has to be visible, often an exposure between a fourth of a second and two seconds is preferable. For mountain streams and waterfalls, the exposure has to be different as well. Again, it depends on the speed of the water, the focal length, and the desired effect.

The best way is to invest in a set of real neutral density filters. Start with a 3-stop and a 10-stop. Depending on your needs, you can expand to a 6-stop or even a 15-stop.

Let Df and Di be the beam diameters at two different points away from the rayleigh range and let l be the distance between them. Then beam divergence (θ) is given by,

Laserbeamdivergenceand spot size

Absolutely agree. I use mine solely for video work. The crosshair issue I only see when using very wide-angle lenses, and it depends on the brand.

Nando Harmsen is a Dutch photographer that is specialized in wedding and landscape photography. With his roots in the analog photo age he gained an extensive knowledge about photography techniques and equipment, and shares this through his personal blog and many workshops.

Beamdivergencecalculator

Thank you for adding the focal length. I forgot to mentioned it (didn't think if it, to be honest :)) Magnetic ND filters is a perfect alternative for the large square filters.

This is the variable neutral density filter. A filter that allows you to change the neutral density just by dialing in the amount. There are a lot of different variants available. Some allow a neutral density that ranges up to 10 stops or even more.

ProMaster makes some VND filters that address these problems very well. They have an X mark on the filter ring that easily identifies where the crosshair effect will begin with a wide lens. By doing that they don't have to severely limit their range like companies such as Polar Pro do. They also have an Extreme VND with a range of 5 to 12 stops. I'm a still photographer only, and I always carry single density NDs unless I'm backpacking or traveling light. During those times I carry two ProMaster VNDs, their standard range and the extreme range. They work amazingly well, especially when every ounce counts.

I use the Haida NanoPro CPL-VND filter with a neutral density range of 3 stops up to 7 stops. It’s perfect for most situations. The benefit of this filter is the built-in polarization effect as well. Although the beginning of a darkening crosshair effect is visible in photography when dialed to 7 stops, it’s nearly imperceptible for video.

Angleofdivergenceformula

It is found that practically the laser beam cannot focus on a point, instead, there is a small beam thickness at the focal point. This smallest distance up to which a laser beam can converge is known as the beam waist (w0). It is basically the focal point of a laser beam.

The crosshair effect that can be seen in photography is less of a problem for video. In most cases, a 16:9 or 16:10 aspect ratio is used. Since the darkening of the frame due to the crosshair effect starts in the corners of the frame, it won’t show up unless the neutral density is turned to the extremes.

This effect slowly creeps into the frame. It will be easily visible in a bright sky or flat surfaces, but if there is a lot of contrast, it will go unnoticed while photographing. But it will be visible during post-processing. In the worst-case scenario, a variable neutral density filter will make the photo unusable.

The position of the filter should not have an effect on the appearance of the cross hair effect. I'm happy to hear it doesn't appear.

Could it be argued that if you choose 16:9 for images instead of video then the crosshair effect would be eliminated. Not saying I'd do this but just wondering.

Rayleigh range (ZR) is the distance from the beam waist where the beam radius has increased √2 times its initial value. This is the point at which the area of cross-section is doubled.

It has and alway will have effect because light at especially wide angle lenses will come from an angle when hitting the filter ... VND is like polariser ( have you ever turn polariser too far on wide angle lens to see one side of photo darker than the other side?) and therefor having filter between lens and body where light is going straight and not in and angle will affect multiple properties such as crosshair, contrast, flare, etc...

Lowdivergence laser

Parallel (Horizontal) beam divergence is the angular measure of the increase in the beam diameter along the optic axis, i.e. along the Z-axis as in the figure.

Beam Divergence of a laser beam is an angular measure of the increase in the beam diameter or the radius with the distance from the beam waist, from where the beam diverges.

Wouldn’t it be wonderful if you could buy just one filter and be done with it? It saves a lot of money, and it’s much easier to carry around with you. Just buy one large filter, like 82mm or 86mm. Use step-up rings to fit the filter onto lenses with a smaller diameter.

"A variable ND filter is intended for videography. It offers a way of controlling the exposure. Due to the aspect ratio (16:9 and 16:10), any crosshair effect will be outside the frame."

Yes, indeed. Cropping will definately influence the visibility in stills. But there is a tendency to keep the aspect ratio of the camera sensor while cropping, although there is no need for it.

Laser divergence anglecalculation

It’s not only the desired exposure that dictates which neutral density filter is necessary. The weather situation and time of day also influence. That’s why it’s important to have a selection of neutral density filters at hand.

For long exposure photography, it’s not about the filter you’re using but about the exposure you need for the desired effect. You can’t simply buy a 10-stop neutral density filter and be done with it. There will be situations where that filter isn’t strong enough. In other situations, the filter is much too strong.

Perpendicular (Vertical) beam divergence is the angular measure of the increase in the beam diameter along the axis perpendicular to the optic axis, i.e. along the Y-axis as in the figure.

The VND problem can be serious on wide angle lenses, so it does rule out their use for those sweeping views of lakes, mountains and deserts. Vloggers can also see the effect if they use wide lenses equivalent to 20mm and wider on full frame. I made the mistake of buying a pricey 82mm VND and passed it on to a video shooter. I much prefer circular magnetic filters for stills because I can change nd values in seconds and there’s no chance of light leakage on very long exposures. I have abandoned rectangular filters and the clumsy holders, which you need for graduated nds. This is because the gradient effect is always linear, unlike most of the high contrast subjects out there. I can usually do a better job in processing and can always take a couple of different exposures as insurance in extreme situations, for example with the sun over the sea, which is about the only situation where a square grad is nearly as good!

If long exposure photography is your thing, you are best off carrying three or even four neutral density filters with you. You need a 3-stop, a 6-stop, a 10-stop, and a 15-stop to be prepared for every situation and desired effect. It also allows you to combine multiple neutral density filters, extending the number of possible densities.

[headline]: YOU SHOULDN’T BE USING VND FILTERS [after jumping to recipe and scrolling past all the ads on the page]: …but also here are the reasons why it’s fine if you do

If long exposures are preferred, there are limits to how far you can go unless you wait for darkness. The best alternative is a neutral density filter, which allows the desired long exposure at any time of day. Whatever you do, don’t use a variable neutral density filter for photography.

This amount of filters can be expensive, especially if you choose good quality. To prevent the need for filters for every lens diameter you have, a filter holder and square filters are preferable. I use the Haida Red Diamond 100mm filters with excellent results, even if two filters are combined. But this is not about the brand; it’s about the costs and the need for a relatively large filter holder and filters. You also need extra space inside the bag to carry this around.

This results in limitations while filming under bright situations. That’s when a variable neutral density filter comes in. It offers a way of controlling the exposure without losing control of the shutter speed and depth of field.

Looking at the effects a variable neutral density filter can have, it seems these filters are unusable for photography. However, a variable neutral density filter is perfect for video.

I just started using variable ND Filter, I didn't notice yet any problem, but maybe I wasn't aware so I missed it. My filter can make a total darkness. Thanks for the tip I will carefully be looking for the phenomena.

If you’re familiar with video, you know how important shutter speed or shutter angle is. If you also want to have control of the depth of field, there is only one way to get the proper exposure: the ISO value. But the ISO value also has limitations if you’re shooting in the log format.

VNDs use paired circular polarization filters to do their job, and I have seen images where half of the view has the polarization effect gradually tapering off to the other half with reduced polarization (clouds on a bright day). Again, just be aware of your tools and what their limitations are.

Although no rule prohibits you from using a variable neutral density filter for photography, I advise being cautious. Always keep an eye out for the darkened crosshair effect. It’s difficult to spot in the viewfinder or on the LCD screen, but it will be noticeable in the end.

If a collimated beam is focused using a lens with a focal length f, then the diameter Dm of the beam at a point far from the rayleigh range is related to the beam divergence θ as,

VND filters are marked so if used properly there will be NO dark cross etc. Only people who fail to use the filters as designed get the dark cross. They are wonderful, no they don’t get real dark but for most general use are awesome.

Laser divergence angletable

The cross hair effect is for incompetent variable ND filter users. Competent users know how to use the variable ND without the cross hair issue. Yes, it isn't as dark as some, but for a lot of situations it works like a charm and saves buying all the densities it covers including the infinite amount between. Need more? Get a more powerful one as well.

A lot of filters are limited to 6-stop or 7-stop. Some offer a 10-stop, which extends a normal exposure 1,000 times. But there is a bigger issue with these filters.

Laser divergence anglepdf

Since the light that passes through a polarization filter is directional, two will form a darkened cross in the frame. The more you rotate the filters relative to each other, the stronger the effect will occur.

We were recommending against variable density ND filters in our stores all the way back into the mid 2000's. Yes, we still sold them, but the customer left the stores knowing what to watch for when using them. Some higher end VNDs have added physical stops that prevent over-rotation which helps reduce if not eliminate the cross filtration issue. But the "not dark enough" problem remains for many applications.

Well... Canon EF-EOS R adapter with variable nd filter slot doesn't have any crosshair effect, yet it sits between the lens and body. 1-7 stop is covering quite a lot because when combined with 3 or 4 stop GND in most situations when shooting sunrise or sunset that's all you need. And it works with all our 14 lenses! Attached photo was shot on Laowa 12/2.8 zero D on FF camera.

A lot of these filters produce terrible results, especially the cheaper ones. If a filter promises a huge range, you can be sure it doesn’t live up to its expectations. But even the expensive ones, with a limited neutral density range, are best to be avoided, at least for photography.

Beam diameter is calculated in terms of beam diameters at two different points far from the rayleigh range and the distance between these points.

Capturing landscapes with long exposures is popular. It can lead to great results when performed correctly. The right exposure time depends on the situation and the desired result.

I recently purchased an Urth vario neutral density filter, but I'm extremely disappointed with its performance. The cross hair effect makes it completely unusable, and I'm unable to fit my lens hood back on with the filter attached. When I requested a refund from Urth, they simply blamed me and suggested that I use the filter on a different lens with the same filter size. Additionally, they mentioned that it can't be used on wide angle or telephoto lenses, so does that mean it's only compatible with 50mm lenses?

The variable neutral density filters use two polarization filters to increase the density of the filter. By rotating a polarization filter in front of another, less and less light will be allowed to pass through the filters.

The first problem you encounter is the limited range of neutral density. Although there are unbelievably large ranges available, most variable filters are not dark enough for really long exposures. If you want more than 30 seconds during daylight, you are lucky to achieve that exposure with a variable neutral density filter.