Lee de-Wit, Ph.D., is a lecturer in political psychology at Cambridge University. He is also the author of What’s Your Bias?: The Surprising Science of Why We Vote the Way We Do.

What Is Raman Scattering? Raman scattering, commonly referred to as the Raman effect, is an optical phenomenon in which the interaction of incoming excitation ...

Thank you for the good ideas and beautiful images. I had been using an Olympus Stylus and enjoying it including its macro capabilities, but the 150mm maximum wasn't long enough for my interest in bird photography. So I splurged on an OMD M1 and the 75-300 lens. I was very pleased with the increased length and the additional capabilities of the M1. But I was pleasantly surprised to discover its ability as a telephoto macro. It allows me to be watching up close and to the distance during my "river walks".

1. Intergroup contact. The “contact hypothesis” suggests that getting to know each other can reduce prejudice between groups. However, social contact can be done well and done badly. As we discussed in a previous article, following political opponents on Twitter can make people more extreme in their political views. It turns out that many conditions have to be met for contact to reduce prejudice, including having contact be sustained, with more than one member of the group, including a genuine exchange of ideas, and between individuals of similar social rank. These conditions have been very difficult to meet in designing social policies.

Become a subscribing member today. Help us continue to bring “the science of a meaningful life” to you and to millions around the globe.

Cameron Brick, Ph.D., is a social psychologist who studies how people react to shared dilemmas such as political polarization or climate change using surveys and experiments. He is a research associate at the University of Cambridge, U.K., in both Maths and Psychology, and is a by-fellow at Churchill College.

Lee de-Wit, Ph.D., is a lecturer in political psychology at Cambridge University. He is also the author of What’s Your Bias?: The Surprising Science of Why We Vote the Way We Do.

Thank you again Peter for yet another excellent article, accompanied by stunning photographs. Just one thing, you say that macro lenses “have shallow depth of field”, and you’ve made similar comments before. This is actually not true, any 60mm lens will always have the same depth of field (at the same aperture) as any other 60mm lens. It’s the laws of physics. Depth of field does become dramatically reduced with lens to subject distance, and the special characteristics of a macro lens allows very close focusing and hence shallow depth of field. The 40-150 set to 60mm has exactly the same depth of field as the 60mm macro - at the same subject distance. Using a longer focal length enable you get further away from you subject increasing the depth of field at that point. Your conclusion though is absolutely correct, using a longer lens is often easier and better for this sort of photography.

The U.S. is one of the few countries to be dominated by just two political parties. This fact is almost certainly a reflection of the “winner take all”/“first past the post” voting system. Many countries employ a proportional (or mixed) system, which means that if a party gets 5 percent of the popular vote, they will receive 5 percent of the seats in a given representative body. In the U.S., this party would almost certainly get no representation—which could worsen the us-and-them dynamic of the U.S. political system.

Edmund Optics® (EO) is a leading global manufacturer and supplier of technology solutions that has been serving a variety of markets since 1942. The company ...

This suggests that while there might be various political seeds that have helped drive the recent spike in polarization, it has gotten to a point where polarization is being exacerbated by some of the psychological processes that shape how we interpret identity and groups. This is a significant point to understand because it highlights that if we are to address polarization, we need to think not just about political solutions, but also solutions that are grounded in our understanding of social psychology.

Polarizationof light notes PDF

The psychological impact of more direct voting systems is worthy of further enquiry. When poorly implemented, referendums risk causing new fault lines along which polarization can manifest. When well implemented, referendums might cut across existing lines of polarization and help establish a new social norm that can move a country forward.

Peter Baumgarten is a professional photographer and educator. He is also an Olympus Visionary and NiSi Official Photographer.

For example, a study by Carlee Beth Hawkins and Brian Nosek shows that labeling policies as “Democrat” or “Republican” can influence policy support, depending on the implicit bias of participants toward each party. A 2017 study by David Tannenbaum and colleagues finds that support for policy “nudges”—such as changing 401k retirement accounts to opt-out rather than opt-in—was heavily influenced by whether they were framed as supporting the goals of the Democratic or Republican party. This was true of regular U.S. citizens and for senior government leaders. Similarly, a 2018 study by Leaf Van Boven and colleagues finds that the majority of Republicans agree that climate change is happening—but their support for policy solutions declined when presented by Democrats.

Mar 9, 2011 — Depth of Field is a function of Focal Length, Effective Aperture, Distance to Subject and Minimum Circle of Confusion. Minimum Circle of ...

Is that true? Research suggests that a universalist perspective might well have underappreciated benefits. Sam McFarland and colleagues recently reviewed this topic and found that those who identify highly as citizens of the world are indeed more empathic. Of course, those who are more empathic might simply identify more as international citizens. This idea warrants further testing, particularly as McFarland and colleagues identify several factors that might serve to further develop this sense of international citizenship.

Sander van der Linden, Ph.D., is assistant professor of social psychology and director of the Cambridge Social Decision-Making Lab at the University of Cambridge. He is also a fellow of Churchill College, Cambridge.

Polarizationexamples

Is it simply disagreement over the great issues of the day? Not necessarily. Recent research by the More in Common Foundation found that more than three-fourths of Americans support both stricter gun laws and a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants brought here as children. Roughly the same number of Americans agree “that our differences are not so great that we cannot come together.”

A diffraction grating is a first surface optic, so its surface cannot be touched or otherwise come in contact with another object without damaging it and ...

The GGSC's Bridging Differences initiative aims to help address the urgent issue of political and cultural polarization. Do you work to help people or groups bridge their differences, whether as a mediator, organization leader, educator, politician, workplace manager, or otherwise? Fill out this short survey and let us know how we can help.

Free online, starting October 5, 2021: Learn research-based strategies for connecting across divides. Join us to bridge differences in your work, community, and life.

To get these curves, the user specifies a certain spatial frequency that's commonly half to three fourths of the maximum. Then the user has the lens design ...

National pride has evil consequences. Prefer pride in humanity. German pride gave us Hitler, American pride gave us Trump, British pride gave us Brexit. If you must have pride, be proud that Homo sapiens could produce a Darwin, Shakespeare, Mandela, Einstein, Beethoven.

What ispolarizationin Chemistry

5. Voting for policies, not for parties. Another potential solution to identity-based policy preferences is to hold direct referendums on specific issues. Among large territories, California and Switzerland both regularly use referendums to address complex policy topics. Referendums are used less frequently in other countries to try to resolve controversial topics, as was the case with gay marriage in Australia or voting reform in New Zealand. When designed well, referendums might cut across existing partisan divides, and if a clear majority is reached, they can signal a new social norm that can help a country move forward.

Of course, superordinate goals also come with a potential risk. Whenever we form an in-group, we also create out-groups. As Richard Dawkins recently tweeted:

I loved your blog and thanks for publishing this about shooting telephoto macros !! I am really happy to come across this exceptionally well written content. Thanks for sharing and look for more in future!! Keep doing this inspirational work and share with us.

It really helped when you said that it would be best to hire the photographer in advanced since the best ones are the first to get booked. I will keep this in mind since my friend and I usually talk about our dream wedding almost every day. When he finally proposes, I will make sure that we hire a photographer in the first place to ensure that he is of good quality. Thanks for the tips!

Polarizationpolitics

W. R. MEADOWS' surface retarders are spray-applied, water-soluble products designed to slow the set of surface mortar in concrete to expose the aggregate. These ...

I have enjoyed your article about telephoto macro. I have an Olympus 5 II and am on the verge of purchasing the 40-150 pro. My question is which converter should I get. Will the 1.4 give enough reach for flowers and birds? Also can the camera be handheld with the 1.4 and /or the 2 x? Thank you for your advice.

In his book The Better Angels of Our Nature, Pinker argues that the printing press may have had an important role in increasing levels of empathy following the Enlightenment by making it easier to read stories framed in the perspective of others. Indeed, Pinker speculates that some of the literature written from the perspective of black slaves may have been instrumental to the abolition of slavery.

Plane ofpolarization

For those who are familiar with the fallout from the recent Brexit referendum in the U.K., however, this suggestion would probably seem a little laughable. Contemptuous, even. Indeed, there is evidence that the referendum in the U.K. has itself spilled over into a new form of emotional polarization, as recent data from YouGov highlights that (especially younger) “Remain” supporters would not want to see a close relative marry a “Leaver” (a member of the opposing political camp). There’s another problem as well: While Australians did indeed vote to legalize same-sex marriage, it could have gone the other way; allowing the majority to vote on the civil and human rights of a minority is very risky.

The More in Common report illustrates that some of the most divisive topics often involve deep moral beliefs. For example, different political groups are very polarized on beliefs about responsibility, such as “people’s outcomes in life are determined largely by forces outside of their control,” or “people are largely responsible for their own outcomes in life.” Similarly, liberals and conservatives are very divided on questions of whether parenting should focus on cultivating a child’s curiosity versus good manners, or independence versus respect for elders.

Polarizationcharacteristics

In other words, people like policies proposed by members of their own in-group—and they don’t like ideas generated by out-groups. This dynamic is not new. Since the 1950s, social psychologists have tried to understand what pits groups against each other—and today, they’re applying these insights to figure out what is happening in the United States. This research doesn’t provide definitive answers, but it does suggest some potential solutions, from changes to the voting system to the development of common goals that might enable groups to work together.

From reframing issues to tap into a superordinate sense of identity, to promoting forms of contact that encourage perspective taking, social psychology does offer some useful ideas for thinking about how to tackle polarization. Furthermore, social psychology provides insights into the potential implications of different kinds of voting systems and the way in which they might exacerbate or diminish identity-based politics. As we have been careful to try and illustrate, however, experiments in social psychology do not yield off-the-shelf solutions that would be effective in all political contexts. Nevertheless, the farther that modern politics sinks into a self-fulfilling cycle of identity-based polarization, the more we’ll need new insights from social science.

The Greater Good Science Center studies the psychology, sociology, and neuroscience of well-being, and teaches skills that foster a thriving, resilient, and compassionate society.

In the wake of the 2024 election, our contributors weigh in on what we can do now to preserve our well-being and our democracy.

The More in Common results could be interpreted to suggest that we can build bipartisan support for specific policies by focusing more on their boring nuts and bolts. Unfortunately, however, voters don’t evaluate policies in isolation. Research has highlighted that people actively use partisan cues when evaluating different policies.

Like many complex political systems, however, referendums can be designed well and designed badly. In countries with more established systems of direct democracy, the U.K. referendum wouldn’t have even been legal. For example, in Switzerland, referendums have to be about precisely defined changes to the law, not vaguely defined outcomes. In New Zealand’s referendum on the voting system, an independent educational body was created to inform both sides of the debate without taking a position (as the British government controversially did during the Brexit referendum).

Free and online: Join us Thursday, Nov. 21, from 10:30–11:30 a.m. PT for a special conversation on the benefits of gratitude, along with practical techniques for people, and practitioners, to easily incorporate it into day-to-day life.

Amazing article! Beautifully explained how and why telephoto lens could be better than traditional macro lens. Best point is you don't cast your shadow on the subject while capturing an image, plus you still get beautiful bokeh. Thanks for sharing!

This article is part of a program that explores evidence-based strategies to improve dialogue, understanding, and relationships across social and political divides. Read More

This partisan influence on policy preferences and moral judgements is a cause for both hope and concern. On one hand, it reiterates a point made by Daniel Yudkin in a New York Times op-ed about the More in Common report: that the U.S. may actually be less politically polarized based on certain moral or policy issues—at least when there aren’t clear partisan associations. On the other hand, it highlights that as soon as a moral or political issue becomes associated with a particular party, it can become polarizing. This is why it increasingly feels like U.S. politics has entered into a vicious cycle, whereby the moral and emotional language used to galvanize one side is directly antagonizing the other. The us-and-them nature of the debate has led to such a breakdown of trust that even hearing a policy proposed by the other side can be enough to trigger opposition to that policy. New policies (whatever their merit) can therefore quickly become symbols of conflict for the two sides to rally around.

Unfortunately, drawing a parallel between Trump and Hitler is perhaps itself an illustration of the polarized nature of modern discourse. Dawkins does have a point, however: The use of a superordinate identity such as American or European has potential risks. So, should we just think of ourselves as humans—or is the idea of “humanity” too abstract? Former British prime minister Theresa May famously criticized such a universalist perspective, stating: “If you believe you are a citizen of the world, you are a citizen of nowhere.”

Get a photo editor app with a color filter option. Look up photo editing apps and read what features they have. I use Photoshop, but it's ...

Sander van der Linden, Ph.D., is assistant professor of social psychology and director of the Cambridge Social Decision-Making Lab at the University of Cambridge. He is also a fellow of Churchill College, Cambridge.

Cameron Brick, Ph.D., is a social psychologist who studies how people react to shared dilemmas such as political polarization or climate change using surveys and experiments. He is a research associate at the University of Cambridge, U.K., in both Maths and Psychology, and is a by-fellow at Churchill College.

Considering the revolution in communication technology in our lifetimes, social media may have done more to promote taking sides than seeing the world through the eyes of another. Social media companies, and the governments that regulate them, clearly need to reflect on the extent to which these platforms encourage “side taking” instead of “perspective taking.”

Researchers, nonprofit leaders, and other experts share what keeps them optimistic about a better future for American society.

1PC 240mm Dia Large Optical PMMA Plastic Big Solar Fresnel Lens Magnifying Glass ; This one's trending. 10 have already sold. ; Est. delivery. Tue, Nov 19 - Wed, ...

2. Perspective taking. Perhaps one of the most important aspects of contact is that it might enable one to see things from another’s perspective. The promise of perspective taking was recently illustrated in an experiment to attempt to change support for issues faced by transgender minorities. In this intervention, a brief exchange exploring a range of issues from the perspective of a trans individual was sufficient to shift people’s attitudes on this controversial topic. Indeed, the attitude change seemed to persist even six months later, which is unusual for brief psychological interventions.

3. Superordinate goals. One of the clearest solutions from the psychological literature is that identity-based conflicts require common goals or a “superordinate” sense of identity to bring people back together. In other words, we need a large sense of ourselves that is able to bridge smaller differences. This need to create a superordinate identity has clearly been intuitive to rulers for centuries, who would use various traditions and ceremonies to help build alliances between different countries and cultures.

Another great article thanks Peter. I love macro photography and have both the 60mm f2.8 & the amazing 40-150mm f2.8 plus both teleconverters & the OM1 MkI & MkII. You have inspired me to get out seek the mushrooms as we are coming to the end of a very wet summer. I will yet again try to get on top of focus bracketing as I realise I was utilising the stacking feature with limited success. Practice! Practice! Want to add how much I enjoy your articles & writing style as as your images. Thank you.

With the U.S. election swiftly approaching, the political divide can feel overwhelming. But what happens when we recognize the limits of our knowledge?

Polarizationin Physics

4. Proportional voting. While searching for psychological solutions to polarization, it’s important not to ignore the context in which political decisions are made, and to think about the way in which different political systems will engage with, and exacerbate, aspects of our psychology.

For now, however, there isn’t systematic evidence comparing the extent of identity-based politics with the political system used in the U.S. Unfortunately, that kind of large-scale, cross-country research is often the most difficult to obtain, but could be exactly what we need to understand how different voting systems might influence polarization.

Jul 24, 2023 — Lasers are categorised into five main types based on their gain medium, which determines the type of laser needed for different applications.

For example, Ireland has run several Citizens Assembles since 2016 that made policy recommendations that have been credited with advances in Ireland’s approach to climate change. Indeed, participants in a recent Citizens Assembly on Brexit, run by Alan Renwick and colleagues at University College London, came to a compromise that could resolve the current impasse surrounding the U.K.’s decision to leave the European Union.

Polarizationof light

Nov 12, 2024 — The meaning of MAGNIFIER is one that magnifies; especially : a lens or combination of lenses that makes something appear larger.

That said, there is evidence that more proportional systems have higher levels of voter turnout (at least for supporters of smaller parties). In turn, that increase in turnout is correlated with citizens being more likely to report feeling that their vote makes a difference. This doesn’t necessarily stop politics becoming less polarized, but it might make it harder for the extremes to come to dominate.

Inspiring article. Since I own both the 60mm macro and the fabulous 40-150mm f2,8, I sometimes do macro photography with these lenses, but I have to practice more with focus bracketing and stacking. BTW, great blog and great photos. Thanks

I've been using "tube extenders" to accomplish macro photography. My budget wouldn't allow me to purchase new macro lenses, but it works with the lenses that I have. Still try to figure out bracketing and stacking (camera doesn't do it automatically)

One promising civic model for enabling more meaningful contact between groups in conflict involves “Citizens Assemblies,” where representative citizens are brought together to deliberate over challenging social or political issues. These assemblies can be thought of as a kind of jury duty for political deliberation, and they offer a platform for different groups to discuss issues in a way that can highlight where common ground exists and how it can be acted upon.

I did a couple of macro shots with Sigma 50-500 + 1.4x lens with Olympus E-MII. Scale was about 1:1 at 1400mm. Of course from tripod.

In a new study published this year, Annemarie S. Walter and David P. Redlawsk directly pitted people’s moral concerns with their partisan identity. They presented 2,000 participants with examples of different moral violations by different actors. Based on previous research, Walter and Redlawsk had thought that the nature of the moral violation might be the most significant factor in people’s evaluations, as there are reasons to think that liberals and conservatives are concerned with some moral violations more than others. What they found, however, is that it wasn’t the nature of the moral violation that was most important. Instead, it was the political allegiance of the violator. Democrats in the study were prone to giving Democrats a pass; the same was even more true of Republicans.