The numerical aperture is a measure of the lens's ability to gather light and resolve fine details. It is determined by the lens design and the refractive index of the medium. A higher numerical aperture allows for a larger depth of field.

To calculate the depth of field (DOF) in a microscope, you need to consider the working distance and the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective lens. The DOF refers to the range of distances along the optical axis where the specimen appears in focus.

To calculate the depth of field (DOF) in a microscope, you need to consider the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective lens and the wavelength of light being used. The depth of field refers to the range of distances along the optical axis where the specimen remains in focus.

To calculate the depth of field (DOF) in a microscope, you need to consider the specifications of the objective lens being used. The DOF refers to the range of distances along the optical axis where the specimen appears to be in focus.

To calculate the depth of field, you need to know the numerical aperture of the objective lens, the wavelength of light used, and the refractive index of the medium. By plugging these values into the formula, you can determine the depth of field for a given microscope setup.

It is important to note that the depth of field is also influenced by other factors such as the thickness of the specimen, the refractive index of the specimen, and the quality of the microscope optics. Additionally, advancements in microscope technology, such as the use of confocal microscopy or computational imaging techniques, can provide improved depth of field capabilities.

OEI controlled deposition recipes are currently qualified for SiO2 Dep (“OEI SiO2 Dep”) and Stoichiometric Nitride (“OEI Stoichiometric Nitride”) recipes, with an OEI recipe in progress for the Si-Rich Nitride. For user-developed films that differ from these established recipes, users are welcome to qualify their own OEI recipes following the Step-by-step instructions in the linked OEI recipe development How-To. If you encounter problems setting up your OEI recipe on EndpointWorks, please contact Tim Harrison (tr1@ualberta.ca).

OEI uses similar principles to other interferometric tools like the Filmetrics F50-UV; the intensity of light at a single wavelength reflected off of a thin film will vary depending on the wavelength of light and the optical thickness of the film. This is due to the relative phase difference between light reflected off the top surface of the film and at the film-substrate interface, i.e., conditions of constructive and destructive interference (shown in Fig. 1). Across a broad spectrum of wavelengths, this can be used to fit to both refractive index and film thickness robustly (as Filmetrics does). However, if the intensity of light reflected off of a growing film is recorded continuously, the intensity at a “single” wavelength will oscillate approximately sinusoidally as the thickness increases (satisfying constructive and destructive interference conditions at specific thicknesses)—this is the fundamental premise of OEI. By noting when the extrema occur during film growth, the period of this oscillation (T) can be used to measure the deposition rate of the film, since T is set by the phase conditions for constructive/destructive interference. T = λ/(2n); where λ is the wavelength of interest and n is the refractive index of the material at this wavelength.

In conclusion, the depth of field in a microscope can be calculated using the formula mentioned above. However, it is essential to consider other factors and advancements in microscopy technology to fully understand the influence of magnification on microscope DOF.

Additionally, the use of adaptive optics in microscopy has shown promise in improving the DOF. Adaptive optics systems can correct for aberrations in real-time, allowing for sharper and more extended focus in microscopy.

Figure 1. Phase conditions for destructive and constructive interference of light reflected off of a thin film, from H. G. Tompkins, and J. N. Hilfiker, Spectroscopic Ellipsometry: Practical Application to Thin Film Characterization (Momentum Press, 2016).

To use OEI in the Plasma-Therm Versaline PECVD, light produced by the plasma is reflected off of the growing film and collected by a spectrometer centred above the wafer for plasma monitoring. The Plasma-Therm EndpointWorks software package is then used to monitor the evolution in time of the spectral intensity emitted from the plasma within a narrow range of wavelengths. Choosing a range that encompasses an emission line of a typical gas/radical species within the plasma produces the oscillatory data shown in Fig. 2. Values of T are calculated based on known values of n and λ to give an estimate of the deposition rate based on the spacing of the extrema. Thus, in order to function correctly, each OEI recipe requires the user to have knowledge of both the growing film (single wavelength refractive index) and of typical optical emission lines (usable wavelengths) within the plasma.

Overall, calculating the depth of field in a microscope involves considering the numerical aperture and the wavelength of light, but it is important to consider other factors and advancements in microscopy techniques for a more accurate assessment.

The choice of what wavelength to use for OEI depends on the chemistry of the plasma in question, since each gas/radical species emits light at different wavelengths (depending on its electronic transitions), and thus the available wavelengths will differ for each recipe. Potential emission lines are further limited if the gas species characteristic of an emission line is consumed during the reaction. The intensity of these reactant emission lines will fluctuate as the film grows and as the local gas concentration changes. In contrast, the intensity of an emission line of an inert gas (He, Ar, or N2 are often used to dilute the reactants) will be much more stable, and will provide a reduction in noise in the reflected light. This leads to a more clearly defined periodic signal, where the extrema can be easily identified in software. Additionally, since variation in T is linear with the wavelength of light used, the choice of shorter wavelengths will reduce the period of oscillation, lending the OEI method more sensitivity and flexibility to accurately measure thinner films. Note, for films that are optically absorbing (e.g. a-Si and Si-rich nitrides), the film will absorb more strongly at shorter wavelengths, decreasing the amplitude of the oscillation as the film grows. Ultimately, this decay reaches a point where extrema cannot be identified past a certain thickness. A general rule of thumb is to choose the shortest wavelength inert gas emission line that is not strongly absorbed by the depositing film. A typical spectrum collected during deposition is shown in Fig. 3, where a N2 emission line at ~333 nm is highlighted, being suitable for the gas chemistry involved. For more details on choosing an emission line appropriate for your deposition, please see the Plasma-Therm Versaline PECVD OEI recipe development How-To on the nanoFAB’s Confluence Knowledge Base.

Additionally, advancements in microscopy techniques, such as confocal microscopy and two-photon microscopy, have allowed for improved control over the DOF. These techniques use specialized optics and scanning mechanisms to selectively capture in-focus information from different depths within the specimen, effectively increasing the effective DOF.

It is important to note that this formula assumes a perfect optical system and does not take into account factors such as aberrations, diffraction, or the thickness of the specimen.

It is important to note that the DOF is inversely proportional to the square of the NA. This means that increasing the NA will decrease the DOF, resulting in a narrower range of focus. However, higher NA objectives can provide higher resolution and better image quality.

The depth of field is inversely proportional to the square of the numerical aperture. This means that as the magnification increases, the numerical aperture also increases, resulting in a decrease in the depth of field. Therefore, higher magnification objectives have a shallower depth of field compared to lower magnification objectives.

Overall, calculating the depth of field in a microscope involves considering the objective lens specifications and taking into account advancements in computational imaging and adaptive optics techniques for improved DOF.

Figure 3. Typical plasma emission spectrum (as measured on the Versaline’s integrated Ocean Optics spectrometer) for the deposition of Si-rich nitride. Inset: full-width at half-max (dashed lines) of the N2 emission line centred at ~333 nm.

In recent years, advancements in microscopy techniques, such as confocal microscopy and adaptive optics, have allowed for improved control over the depth of field. These techniques use various methods to selectively illuminate and detect light from specific focal planes, resulting in enhanced resolution and extended depth of field.

In conclusion, the depth of field in a microscope can be calculated using the working distance and the numerical aperture of the objective lens. However, it is important to consider the trade-off between DOF and resolution when choosing the appropriate objective for a specific microscopy application.

In plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) tools, the deposition rate of deposited films can often fluctuate with relative gas concentrations, material build-up on the chamber walls, and other mechanisms that make timed depositions inconsistent. To combat this problem, a simple technique called Optical Emission Interferometry (OEI) can be used. OEI provides a more robust form of deposition control based on the interference of light reflected off of the growing film to precisely hit target film thicknesses.

Full range of fabrication capabilities from CAD design, through deposition, lithography, etch, characterization, and packaging.

This formula gives an approximation of the depth of field, which is the distance along the optical axis within which the specimen appears in focus. It is important to note that this formula assumes a thin lens approximation and does not take into account factors such as aberrations or lens design.

It is important to note that this formula assumes a perfect lens and a homogeneous medium. In reality, aberrations and variations in the refractive index can affect the depth of field. Additionally, the depth of field can be influenced by factors such as the magnification of the lens, the size of the aperture, and the quality of the optics.

The working distance is the distance between the front lens of the objective and the specimen. It is an important factor in determining the DOF. A longer working distance generally results in a larger DOF.

In recent years, advancements in microscopy techniques have led to the development of new methods for calculating DOF. For example, computational imaging techniques, such as extended depth of field (EDOF) algorithms, can be used to enhance the DOF beyond the physical limitations of the objective lens. These techniques involve capturing a series of images at different focal planes and then combining them to create a single image with an extended DOF.