With DistillerSR, the University of Florida can take on bigger projects with more confidence. By improving the speed and accuracy of their reviews, they maximized their funding and provided the best possible evidence to their stakeholders.

Philips was looking for a transparent, standardized platform for more efficient literature reviews and CER submissions. Implementing DistillerSR resulted in over 70% faster literature review screening while improving speed and accuracy for CER submissions.

We take a holistic approach to making you successful. From configuring your first project, to consulting on a complex research set up, or training your team and answering support questions, we are here to ensure you are successful from day one.

DistillerSR transformed BSCI’s literature review processes by improving efficiency, standardization, and traceability, which resulted in more accurate and consistent regulatory submissions.

Global research organizations, including 70% of the top 10 pharmaceutical and medical device companies, trust DistillerSR software to produce transparent, audit-ready, and regulatory-compliant literature reviews.

“I was very proud to put in place a requirement that all my special agents would wear body cameras and keep those cameras on.”

ProCon.org is the institutional or organization author for all ProCon.org pages. Proper citation depends on your preferred or required style manual. Below are the proper citations for this page according to four style manuals (in alphabetical order): the Modern Language Association Style Manual (MLA), the Chicago Manual of Style (Chicago), the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA), and Kate Turabian's A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations (Turabian). Here are the proper bibliographic citations for this page according to four style manuals (in alphabetical order):

Tracks 100% of every search, every reference, every change, and every cell of data to ensure your review is audit-ready.

Purpose-built GenAI for Literature Reviews: Learn how reviewers can focus on high-value work, reduce fatigue, and meet the rising demand for faster, more accurate reviews.

The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) team needed a better solution to manage their growing workload. Implementing DistillerSR resulted in a 75% reduction in screening which allowed them to move relevant references on to critical appraisal and ultimately getting research out to decision makers faster.

Everything you need to know to evaluate systematic review software for your next project. Evaluate all your options using our handy checklist.

Seeking a solution to overcome increasing volumes of scientific literature Maple Health Group transformed their processes with DistillerSR to achieve efficiency gains and data-driven insights.

“Some of these [police] departments have plenty of money, and some of them don’t. And if they like the idea of the cameras, they need federal funding. It can solve a lot of problems for police. It can also solve a lot of problems – period…. [But] different police departments feel different ways.”

Editors’ Note: Oliver retweeted a post from Our Tallahassee: “Body camera video shows Tallahassee Police Department Officer planting evidence in a DUI arrest.”

Global research organizations, including 70% of the top 10 pharmaceutical and medical device companies, trust DistillerSR software to produce transparent, audit-ready, and regulatory-compliant literature reviews.

Police body cameras (also called body-worn cameras) are small cameras worn on a law enforcement officer’s chest or head to record interactions between the officer and the public. The cameras have a microphone to capture sound and internal data storage to save video footage for later review. According to the Bureau of Justice Assistance, “[t]he video and audio recordings from BWCs [body-worn cameras] can be used by law enforcement to demonstrate transparency to their communities; to document statements, observations, behaviors, and other evidence; and to deter unprofessional, illegal, and inappropriate behaviors by both law enforcement and the public.” For more on police body cameras, explore the ProCon debate.

Supports multiple workflows, protocols, and teams across all industries with 100% configurable workflows that work the way you do.

Findings indicate that organizations who invest in literature review software are more confident in their regulatory submissions.

DistillerSR enabled faster reference screening, reducing title and abstract screening time by 85% from nearly four minutes to 35 seconds per reference in Geistlich Pharma’s first project.

“I, as a general matter, believe that we should invest in the ability of law enforcement leaders in specific regions and with their departments to use… discretion to figure out what technology they are going to adopt based on needs that they have and resources that they have. So, I don’t think we can have a one-size-fits-all approach to this.”

Bryan Anderson, “Debate Fact Check: Kamala Harris’s Body Camera Comments Didn’t Tell Full Story of Her Record,” sacbee.com, June 28, 2019 Christopher Cadelago, “Kamala Harris Disagrees with Statewide Police Body-Camera Regulations,” sacbee.com, May 27, 2015

Used by the most prominent public and private sector research teams, DistillerSR AI seamlessly integrates into all aspects of the literature review workflow.

The DistillerSR platform automates the conduct and management of literature reviews so you can deliver better research faster, more accurately and cost-effectively. DistillerSR’s highly configurable, AI-enabled workflow streamlines the entire literature review lifecycle, allowing you to make more informed evidence-based health policy decisions, clinical practice guidelines, and regulatory submissions.

“Police militarization is an endless, deadly arms race that endangers people of color & the poor, & impoverishes our communities. Tweaks around the margins (body cams, bias training, duty to report etc.) haven’t worked. This needs a total system change.”

Reduces overall literature review times by 35%-50% by automating every stage of the process saving critical times and resources.