The data cited was collected by National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). This is a tool that the federal government utilizes annually by obtaining information through methodologies similar to a census. According to the BJS website, the NCVS is conducted annually from “a nationally representative sample of about 90,000 households, comprising nearly 160,000 persons, on the frequency,

NIBRScrime types

The information used comes from other crimes scenes, police reports, psychological evaluations, and victimology reports. When using inductive reasoning, the profiler must first start with a hypothesis, and then information is gathered to support or reject the hypothesis. This type of profiling focuses on the “typical” offender for the type of crime they committed (Bartol & Bartol,

What is theUCR

One particular example would be the definition of burglary. The NCVS “defines burglary as the entry or attempted entry of a residence by a person who had no right to be there” (Barnett-Ryan et al., 2014). Whereas the UCR “defines burglary as the unlawful entry or attempted entry of a structure to commit a felony or theft” (Barnett-Ryan et al., 2014). The fourth, the UCR/NIBRS program centers its data collection around actual offense counts that are reported by city, county, state and federal agencies. The NCVS program uses estimates from a portion of survey interviews. The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) “describes trend data in the NCVS reports as genuine only if there is at least 90 percent certainty that the measured changes are not the result of sampling variation” (Barnett-Ryan et al.,

Violence is unacceptable We are living in a turbulent world. On average, there are about 150,000 deaths every day because of diseases, old age, traffic accidents, and especially violence. The data from FBI indicates that in 2013, an estimated 1,163,146 violent crimes occurred in America, and somebody commits a hate crime every hour ("Violent Crime”). The fact that more and more gruesome murders happen shows that we are living in fear of violence, and this violence is unacceptable. FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program states that, “violent crime is composed of four offenses: murder and non-negligent manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault,” ("Violent Crime”).

NIBRStraining

In the article “The Crime Bust” by Gordon Witkin, it is introduced that in 1994, after a 9 year soar in crime rates, they began falling (1). According to preliminary figures released by the FBI, all across the board, the amount of crime committals were declining at a drastic rate. (Witkin 1). To determine the source of this sudden decline, several factors were examined, such as the economy, dismissed as “Robbery and burglary fluctuate with economic conditions--but murders generally do not…” (Witkin, 1-2) Prevention and domestic abuse were also discredited since “Studies show that prevention programs don’t work, and others may or may not be effective…” and “...in 1996, there were only 447 fewer ‘domestics’ than in 1993, accounting for just 9 percent of the murder reduction.”

Contrast the UCR/NIBRS with the NCVS The Uniform Crime Report (UCR) has been administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) since 1930 and has grown tremendously over the years. The UCR now includes data from city, county, state, and federal law enforcement agencies from across the United States. In its infancy, the UCR constructed a Crime Index that “summed the occurrences of seven major offenses, including murder, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft—and expressed the results as a crime rate based on population” (Schmalleger, 2009) with arson being added to the list during 1979. However, due to skewed data the Crime Index was officially take out of use in the UCR/NIBRS program during 2004. The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) was initiated during 1988 and redesigned the UCR …show more content…

FBINIBRS

I think that the most significant weakness is that the NIBRS is one of the more detailed databases in the fact that it tracks for useful information like offenders with multiple offenses or multiple victims, however it is highly under reported. NIBRS was designed to improve the weakness that occur within the UCR, nevertheless if nobody is reporting to the database it cannot improve. According to Terry (2013), “Currently, police departments representing only 17 percent of the population submit data to NIBRS” (pg. 11). That is a huge weakness that only 17% report to NIBRS.

Does the Felony Murder Rule Deter? Evidence from FBI Crime Data. New York Times (Working Paper). Retrieved February 21, 2018, from http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/malani.pdf. Robinson, Paul H., & Williams, Tyler S. (2017).

“Data Collection: National Judicial Reporting Program (NJRP) 1986-2006.” United States Department of Justice. . Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2012. “Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems.”

NIBRSdata

Introduction The top two and most commonly used programs for reporting and tracking crime statistics in the United States are the Uniform Crime Reports, UCR, program and the National Incident-Based Reporting System, NIBRS, program. Each program contains data from crimes and incidents that is tracked, analyzed, and reported by different law enforcement agencies from the reported incidents. While the UCR is the most commonly used, many law enforcement agencies are working towards shifting to full participation of NIBRS. Both programs use similar methodology to create reports of their crime based statistics, but still contain varying differences.

the Bureau released its latest Hate Crime Statistics report—this one containing data for 2015—that includes information detailing the offenses, victims, offenders, and locations of hate crimes. Additional findings in Hate Crime Statistics, 2015 include the following: There were 5,818 single-bias incidents involving 7,121 victims. New to the 2015 Hate Crime Statistics report is the inclusion of seven additional religious anti-bias categories (anti-Buddhist, anti-Eastern Orthodox, anti-Hindu, anti-Jehovah’s Witness, anti-Mormon, anti-other Christian, and anti-Sikh), as well as an anti-Arab bias motivation. But in addition to its investigative work, the FBI gathers and publishes—through its Uniform Crime Reporting Program—hate crime statistics from law enforcement agencies across the country to help provide an accurate accounting of the problem, by state and nationally. Of the 4,482 hate crime offenses classified as crimes against persons, intimidation

NIBRSdata download

Through this graph we see a substantial difference in the amount of crime from 1990, which was 527,257 in contrast to 2014, which was 106,722. We can also

Correct the misinformation from the U.S. Congress to the relative extreme harmful effects with the use of crack cocaine as compared with powder cocaine; Inform the legislator to review the reports of the USSC regarding the previous actions in the case of crack cocaine criminal penalties. Sentencing penalties for possessing specific `drugs, must not be singled out as more dangerous, until the data has been reviewed. Correct and prevent the claims to the seriousness for the majority of crack cocaine offenses, without providing the data demonstrating the adequate proportionality. Their unfounded claims to the severity of the drug mostly impacted minorities.

UCR vs NIBRS vsNCVS

Contrary to the common belief, crime has been on the decline for the past three decades. Yet, news and media have been covering crime more than ever, resulting in the public belief that crime is at an all time high. The sharp drop in crime since the early 1990s has left experts curious to discover the reasons for the decrease in crime. As I compare the article Understanding Why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors that Explain the Decline and Six that Do Not by Steven D. Levitt and the article Evaluating Contemporary Crime Drop(s) in America, New York City, and Many Other Places by Eric P. Baumer and Kevin T. Wolff, I will briefly describe the articles, compare their agreements and disagreements, as well as discuss my personal preferences.

In 1972, the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) was first implemented and based on victim self-reports rather than on police reports to uncover crime that is not reported to police and …show more content…

The CSI effect describes the way CSI is exaggerated on crime television shows such as CSI: Crime Scene Investigation and Sherlock which influences public perception. As a result, Jurors have come to have unrealistic expectations about the quantity, quality, and availability of scientific evidence, thereby raising the effective standard of proof for prosecutors. As technology improves and becomes more prevalent throughout society, people may also develop higher expectations for the capabilities of forensic technology. The csi effect creates unrealistic expectations of the public and has raised the juror’s expectations of the crime investigating field.

For example, in the text in source two it stated "The vera Institute for justice found a 36 percent recidivism rate for individuals who had completed alternative drug programs in new York city, compared with 54